{"title":"评价利多卡因在重症监护病房室性心律失常和心力衰竭患者中的初始剂量","authors":"Kazuhiko Kido","doi":"10.1002/clc.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Lidocaine is an antiarrhythmic with narrow therapeutic window indicated for refractory ventricular arrhythmia. Limited guidance is available regarding the initial infusion rate ranging from 1 to 4 mg/min in patients with heart failure (HF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The primary objective was to assess the optimal initial dosing of lidocaine therapy in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The retrospective cohort study was performed to include patients aged 18 years or older with past medical history of HF or new onset HF who developed ventricular arrythmia requiring lidocaine therapy in cardiovascular intensive care units. The primary outcome was lidocaine levels within the therapeutic ranges (defined as 1.5 to 5.0 μg/L). The study also described the predictive performance of lidocaine one compartment PK model using correlation efficient between the population PK model-predicted levels and observed levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 56 patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia was included. The mean lidocaine maintenance dose was 1.1 ± 0.5 mg/min. The median (IQR) lidocaine level was 3.1 (2.3, 4.1) μg/L. The probabilities within therapeutic, supratherapeutic, and subtherapeutic ranges were 66.1%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively in the whole cohort. Predicted lidocaine levels with one compartment PK model were not correlated with observed lidocaine levels (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.34). The simulation investigation showed that 1 mg/min rate achieved the highest probability within therapeutic range compared to 0.5, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/min rates (78.6 vs. 53.6, 53.6, and 28.6%, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Lidocaine initial infusion rate should be up to 1 mg/min in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Lidocaine's Initial Dosing in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and Heart Failure Admitted in Intensive Care Units\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiko Kido\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lidocaine is an antiarrhythmic with narrow therapeutic window indicated for refractory ventricular arrhythmia. Limited guidance is available regarding the initial infusion rate ranging from 1 to 4 mg/min in patients with heart failure (HF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The primary objective was to assess the optimal initial dosing of lidocaine therapy in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The retrospective cohort study was performed to include patients aged 18 years or older with past medical history of HF or new onset HF who developed ventricular arrythmia requiring lidocaine therapy in cardiovascular intensive care units. The primary outcome was lidocaine levels within the therapeutic ranges (defined as 1.5 to 5.0 μg/L). The study also described the predictive performance of lidocaine one compartment PK model using correlation efficient between the population PK model-predicted levels and observed levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 56 patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia was included. The mean lidocaine maintenance dose was 1.1 ± 0.5 mg/min. The median (IQR) lidocaine level was 3.1 (2.3, 4.1) μg/L. The probabilities within therapeutic, supratherapeutic, and subtherapeutic ranges were 66.1%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively in the whole cohort. Predicted lidocaine levels with one compartment PK model were not correlated with observed lidocaine levels (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.34). The simulation investigation showed that 1 mg/min rate achieved the highest probability within therapeutic range compared to 0.5, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/min rates (78.6 vs. 53.6, 53.6, and 28.6%, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lidocaine initial infusion rate should be up to 1 mg/min in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70126\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Lidocaine's Initial Dosing in Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and Heart Failure Admitted in Intensive Care Units
Introduction
Lidocaine is an antiarrhythmic with narrow therapeutic window indicated for refractory ventricular arrhythmia. Limited guidance is available regarding the initial infusion rate ranging from 1 to 4 mg/min in patients with heart failure (HF).
Objectives
The primary objective was to assess the optimal initial dosing of lidocaine therapy in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.
Methods
The retrospective cohort study was performed to include patients aged 18 years or older with past medical history of HF or new onset HF who developed ventricular arrythmia requiring lidocaine therapy in cardiovascular intensive care units. The primary outcome was lidocaine levels within the therapeutic ranges (defined as 1.5 to 5.0 μg/L). The study also described the predictive performance of lidocaine one compartment PK model using correlation efficient between the population PK model-predicted levels and observed levels.
Results
A total of 56 patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia was included. The mean lidocaine maintenance dose was 1.1 ± 0.5 mg/min. The median (IQR) lidocaine level was 3.1 (2.3, 4.1) μg/L. The probabilities within therapeutic, supratherapeutic, and subtherapeutic ranges were 66.1%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively in the whole cohort. Predicted lidocaine levels with one compartment PK model were not correlated with observed lidocaine levels (R2 = 0.34). The simulation investigation showed that 1 mg/min rate achieved the highest probability within therapeutic range compared to 0.5, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/min rates (78.6 vs. 53.6, 53.6, and 28.6%, respectively).
Conclusion
Lidocaine initial infusion rate should be up to 1 mg/min in patients with HF and ventricular arrhythmia.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.