拉萨地块在中二叠世是否处于低纬度?从新的古地磁和地质年代学数据的见解

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Longyun Xing, Xin Cheng, Mathew Domeier, Bitian Wei, Zhongshan Shen, Nan Jiang, Jiahui Zhang, Qinglong Chen, Shuqi Lan, Dongmeng Zhang, Yanan Zhou, Chenglong Deng, Hanning Wu
{"title":"拉萨地块在中二叠世是否处于低纬度?从新的古地磁和地质年代学数据的见解","authors":"Longyun Xing,&nbsp;Xin Cheng,&nbsp;Mathew Domeier,&nbsp;Bitian Wei,&nbsp;Zhongshan Shen,&nbsp;Nan Jiang,&nbsp;Jiahui Zhang,&nbsp;Qinglong Chen,&nbsp;Shuqi Lan,&nbsp;Dongmeng Zhang,&nbsp;Yanan Zhou,&nbsp;Chenglong Deng,&nbsp;Hanning Wu","doi":"10.1029/2024GL114347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The absence of reliable paleomagnetic constraints from the Lhasa Block has led to alternative interpretations of its late Paleozoic position and timing of rifting from Gondwana, reflecting uncertainties in early Neo-Tethyan paleogeography. This study presents paleomagnetic and geochronological data from the middle Permian Luobadui Formation, providing a new paleogeographic constraint on the Lhasa Block. Despite possible remagnetization, the dual-polarity magnetization, hosted in different minerals and lithologies, likely represents a middle Permian remanence. This constraint implies the Lhasa Block was located at 16.7 ± 5.3°S at 267.8 ± 5 Ma, following its rifting from Gondwana. New U-Pb detrital zircon ages from sandstones further suggest the Lhasa Block was located along the northwestern margin of Australia prior to rifting. Integrating other geological evidence, we propose that the Bangong Co-Nujiang and Yarlung-Zangbo oceans, now preserved as sutures flanking the Lhasa Block, both opened before the middle Permian, potentially representing branches of the same nascent oceanic corridor (Neo-Tethys).</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL114347","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was the Lhasa Block at Low Latitudes in the Middle Permian? Insights From New Paleomagnetic and Geochronological Data\",\"authors\":\"Longyun Xing,&nbsp;Xin Cheng,&nbsp;Mathew Domeier,&nbsp;Bitian Wei,&nbsp;Zhongshan Shen,&nbsp;Nan Jiang,&nbsp;Jiahui Zhang,&nbsp;Qinglong Chen,&nbsp;Shuqi Lan,&nbsp;Dongmeng Zhang,&nbsp;Yanan Zhou,&nbsp;Chenglong Deng,&nbsp;Hanning Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GL114347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The absence of reliable paleomagnetic constraints from the Lhasa Block has led to alternative interpretations of its late Paleozoic position and timing of rifting from Gondwana, reflecting uncertainties in early Neo-Tethyan paleogeography. This study presents paleomagnetic and geochronological data from the middle Permian Luobadui Formation, providing a new paleogeographic constraint on the Lhasa Block. Despite possible remagnetization, the dual-polarity magnetization, hosted in different minerals and lithologies, likely represents a middle Permian remanence. This constraint implies the Lhasa Block was located at 16.7 ± 5.3°S at 267.8 ± 5 Ma, following its rifting from Gondwana. New U-Pb detrital zircon ages from sandstones further suggest the Lhasa Block was located along the northwestern margin of Australia prior to rifting. Integrating other geological evidence, we propose that the Bangong Co-Nujiang and Yarlung-Zangbo oceans, now preserved as sutures flanking the Lhasa Block, both opened before the middle Permian, potentially representing branches of the same nascent oceanic corridor (Neo-Tethys).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL114347\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL114347\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL114347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于拉萨地块缺乏可靠的古地磁约束,导致对其晚古生代位置和冈瓦纳裂谷时间的不同解释,反映了新特提斯早期古地理的不确定性。本文利用中二叠统罗坝堆组的古地磁和年代学资料,为拉萨地块提供了新的古地理约束。尽管可能存在再磁化,但存在于不同矿物和岩性中的双极性磁化可能代表了中二叠纪剩余物。这一约束条件表明拉萨地块位于16.7±5.3°S,位置为267.8±5 Ma,由冈瓦纳裂化而来。新的砂岩U-Pb碎屑锆石年龄进一步表明,拉萨地块在裂陷前位于澳大利亚西北缘。综合其他地质证据,我们认为班公-怒江海洋和雅鲁藏布江海洋都是在拉萨地块两侧的缝合线,它们都是在中二叠世之前开放的,可能代表了同一新生海洋走廊(新特提斯)的分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Was the Lhasa Block at Low Latitudes in the Middle Permian? Insights From New Paleomagnetic and Geochronological Data

Was the Lhasa Block at Low Latitudes in the Middle Permian? Insights From New Paleomagnetic and Geochronological Data

The absence of reliable paleomagnetic constraints from the Lhasa Block has led to alternative interpretations of its late Paleozoic position and timing of rifting from Gondwana, reflecting uncertainties in early Neo-Tethyan paleogeography. This study presents paleomagnetic and geochronological data from the middle Permian Luobadui Formation, providing a new paleogeographic constraint on the Lhasa Block. Despite possible remagnetization, the dual-polarity magnetization, hosted in different minerals and lithologies, likely represents a middle Permian remanence. This constraint implies the Lhasa Block was located at 16.7 ± 5.3°S at 267.8 ± 5 Ma, following its rifting from Gondwana. New U-Pb detrital zircon ages from sandstones further suggest the Lhasa Block was located along the northwestern margin of Australia prior to rifting. Integrating other geological evidence, we propose that the Bangong Co-Nujiang and Yarlung-Zangbo oceans, now preserved as sutures flanking the Lhasa Block, both opened before the middle Permian, potentially representing branches of the same nascent oceanic corridor (Neo-Tethys).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Research Letters
Geophysical Research Letters 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
1588
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信