Meenaz Karim, Irfan Qamruddin, Liszen Tang, Adam Husein, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Danish Ali, Sarvaich Kumar
{"title":"一项单中心随机临床试验(RCT):评价早期使用正畸金属丝固定牙齿对正畸患者拔牙后疼痛的影响","authors":"Meenaz Karim, Irfan Qamruddin, Liszen Tang, Adam Husein, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Danish Ali, Sarvaich Kumar","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/5572808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prior engagement of tooth with orthodontic appliance on postextraction pain among orthodontic patients.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients, who needed bilateral extractions of first premolars in upper arches, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of extractions. Group A needed extractions before alignment, while Group B needed extractions for retraction of anterior teeth. Group A was sent for extractions first, while Group B went for orthodontic bonding and banding procedures for orthodontic treatment. After series of aligning wires (0.014, 0.016, 17 × 25, 19 × 25 heat-activated NiTi and 19 × 25 SS), patients from Group B were sent for extractions. For pain assessment, an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) was given to record pain intensity at 2, 4, 8, 12, and then 24 h after extraction for the next 7 days. A nonparametric Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare the level of pain perception between males and females and between groups.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Females in Group A reported greater pain (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, 2nd and 3rd day after extraction, while there was no gender dimorphism in Group B. Group A reported more pain at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after extractions when compared with Group B (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Early engagement of teeth with orthodontic appliances may potentially reduce postextraction pain in patients.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06582836.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/5572808","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Assessment of Postextraction Pain in Orthodontic Patients to Evaluate the Effects of Early Engagement of Tooth With Orthodontic Wires: A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)\",\"authors\":\"Meenaz Karim, Irfan Qamruddin, Liszen Tang, Adam Husein, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Danish Ali, Sarvaich Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/5572808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prior engagement of tooth with orthodontic appliance on postextraction pain among orthodontic patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients, who needed bilateral extractions of first premolars in upper arches, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of extractions. Group A needed extractions before alignment, while Group B needed extractions for retraction of anterior teeth. Group A was sent for extractions first, while Group B went for orthodontic bonding and banding procedures for orthodontic treatment. After series of aligning wires (0.014, 0.016, 17 × 25, 19 × 25 heat-activated NiTi and 19 × 25 SS), patients from Group B were sent for extractions. For pain assessment, an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) was given to record pain intensity at 2, 4, 8, 12, and then 24 h after extraction for the next 7 days. A nonparametric Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare the level of pain perception between males and females and between groups.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Females in Group A reported greater pain (<i>p</i> < 0.05) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, 2nd and 3rd day after extraction, while there was no gender dimorphism in Group B. Group A reported more pain at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after extractions when compared with Group B (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Early engagement of teeth with orthodontic appliances may potentially reduce postextraction pain in patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06582836.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/5572808\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/5572808\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/5572808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Assessment of Postextraction Pain in Orthodontic Patients to Evaluate the Effects of Early Engagement of Tooth With Orthodontic Wires: A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)
Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prior engagement of tooth with orthodontic appliance on postextraction pain among orthodontic patients.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients, who needed bilateral extractions of first premolars in upper arches, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of extractions. Group A needed extractions before alignment, while Group B needed extractions for retraction of anterior teeth. Group A was sent for extractions first, while Group B went for orthodontic bonding and banding procedures for orthodontic treatment. After series of aligning wires (0.014, 0.016, 17 × 25, 19 × 25 heat-activated NiTi and 19 × 25 SS), patients from Group B were sent for extractions. For pain assessment, an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) was given to record pain intensity at 2, 4, 8, 12, and then 24 h after extraction for the next 7 days. A nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the level of pain perception between males and females and between groups.
Results: Females in Group A reported greater pain (p < 0.05) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, 2nd and 3rd day after extraction, while there was no gender dimorphism in Group B. Group A reported more pain at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after extractions when compared with Group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Early engagement of teeth with orthodontic appliances may potentially reduce postextraction pain in patients.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.