{"title":"定律、初始条件和物理形态:来自宇宙学的教训","authors":"Antonis Antoniou","doi":"10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Certain considerations from cosmology (Ellis, in: arXiv preprint, 2006. arXiv:astro-ph/0602280; Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 46:5–23, 2014) and other areas of physics (Sklar, in: PSA Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, pp. 551–564, 1990; Frisch, in: Philos Sci 71:696–706, 2004) pose challenges to the traditional distinction between laws and initial conditions, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of physical modality. A solution to these challenges is provided by presenting a conceptual framework according to which laws and fundamental lawlike assumptions within a theory’s nomic structure determine what is physically necessary and what is physically contingent from a physical theory’s point of view. Initial conditions are defined within this framework in terms of the possible configurations of a physical system allowed by the laws and other lawlike assumptions of a theory. The proposed deflationary framework of physical modality offers an alternative way of understanding the distinction between laws and initial conditions and allows the question of the modal status of the initial conditions of the Universe to be asked in a meaningful way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":569,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Physics","volume":"55 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laws, Initial Conditions and Physical Modality: Lessons from Cosmology\",\"authors\":\"Antonis Antoniou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Certain considerations from cosmology (Ellis, in: arXiv preprint, 2006. arXiv:astro-ph/0602280; Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 46:5–23, 2014) and other areas of physics (Sklar, in: PSA Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, pp. 551–564, 1990; Frisch, in: Philos Sci 71:696–706, 2004) pose challenges to the traditional distinction between laws and initial conditions, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of physical modality. A solution to these challenges is provided by presenting a conceptual framework according to which laws and fundamental lawlike assumptions within a theory’s nomic structure determine what is physically necessary and what is physically contingent from a physical theory’s point of view. Initial conditions are defined within this framework in terms of the possible configurations of a physical system allowed by the laws and other lawlike assumptions of a theory. The proposed deflationary framework of physical modality offers an alternative way of understanding the distinction between laws and initial conditions and allows the question of the modal status of the initial conditions of the Universe to be asked in a meaningful way.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations of Physics\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自宇宙学的某些考虑(Ellis, in: arXiv预印本,2006)。/ 0602280 arXiv:期刊上刊登;(Sklar, in: PSA Proceedings of the philosophical of science association, pp. 551-564, 1990;Frisch, in: Philos Sci 71:696-706, 2004)对传统的法则和初始条件之间的区别提出了挑战,表明需要对物理形态进行更细致入微的理解。解决这些挑战的方法是提出一个概念框架,根据该框架,理论经济学结构中的定律和基本定律假设决定了从物理理论的角度来看,什么是物理上必要的,什么是物理上偶然的。在这个框架内,初始条件是根据定律和理论的其他类似定律的假设所允许的物理系统的可能配置来定义的。提出的物理模态的通货紧缩框架提供了理解定律和初始条件之间区别的另一种方式,并允许以有意义的方式提出宇宙初始条件的模态状态问题。
Laws, Initial Conditions and Physical Modality: Lessons from Cosmology
Certain considerations from cosmology (Ellis, in: arXiv preprint, 2006. arXiv:astro-ph/0602280; Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 46:5–23, 2014) and other areas of physics (Sklar, in: PSA Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association, pp. 551–564, 1990; Frisch, in: Philos Sci 71:696–706, 2004) pose challenges to the traditional distinction between laws and initial conditions, indicating the need for a more nuanced understanding of physical modality. A solution to these challenges is provided by presenting a conceptual framework according to which laws and fundamental lawlike assumptions within a theory’s nomic structure determine what is physically necessary and what is physically contingent from a physical theory’s point of view. Initial conditions are defined within this framework in terms of the possible configurations of a physical system allowed by the laws and other lawlike assumptions of a theory. The proposed deflationary framework of physical modality offers an alternative way of understanding the distinction between laws and initial conditions and allows the question of the modal status of the initial conditions of the Universe to be asked in a meaningful way.
期刊介绍:
The conceptual foundations of physics have been under constant revision from the outset, and remain so today. Discussion of foundational issues has always been a major source of progress in science, on a par with empirical knowledge and mathematics. Examples include the debates on the nature of space and time involving Newton and later Einstein; on the nature of heat and of energy; on irreversibility and probability due to Boltzmann; on the nature of matter and observation measurement during the early days of quantum theory; on the meaning of renormalisation, and many others.
Today, insightful reflection on the conceptual structure utilised in our efforts to understand the physical world is of particular value, given the serious unsolved problems that are likely to demand, once again, modifications of the grammar of our scientific description of the physical world. The quantum properties of gravity, the nature of measurement in quantum mechanics, the primary source of irreversibility, the role of information in physics – all these are examples of questions about which science is still confused and whose solution may well demand more than skilled mathematics and new experiments.
Foundations of Physics is a privileged forum for discussing such foundational issues, open to physicists, cosmologists, philosophers and mathematicians. It is devoted to the conceptual bases of the fundamental theories of physics and cosmology, to their logical, methodological, and philosophical premises.
The journal welcomes papers on issues such as the foundations of special and general relativity, quantum theory, classical and quantum field theory, quantum gravity, unified theories, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, cosmology, and similar.