锂离子电池荷电状态估算技术的分析与比较

IF 2.4 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ionics Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s11581-025-06140-4
Mohamed R. Zaki, Mohamed A. El-Beltagy, Ahmed E. Hammad
{"title":"锂离子电池荷电状态估算技术的分析与比较","authors":"Mohamed R. Zaki,&nbsp;Mohamed A. El-Beltagy,&nbsp;Ahmed E. Hammad","doi":"10.1007/s11581-025-06140-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in the automotive INDUSTRY for their high energy density. Accurate state of charge estimation is essential for optimizing battery performance and longevity. This study utilizes a third-order resistance–capacitance equivalent circuit model with parameters estimated via MATLAB/Simulink Simscape. Four state of charge estimation methods: Coulomb counting, Extended Kalman filter, Unscented Kalman filter, and Extended Kalman-Bucy filter are evaluated. Extended Kalman-Bucy filter demonstrated the highest accuracy (Mean Absolute Error = 0.008%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.01%) but required the longest computation time (32.938 s), whereas Coulomb counting was the fastest (6.237 s) but least accurate (Mean Absolute Error = 0.0445%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.0548%). To enhance state of charge estimation, a deep neural network is designed to predict equivalent circuit model parameters based on state of charge and temperature. The deep neural network predictions were integrated into the Extended Kalman-Bucy filter using two strategies: Direct Integration and Fusion Integration. The Fusion method demonstrated the best performance (Mean Absolute Error = 0.12%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.15%) but had a higher execution time (605 s) compared to Direct Integration (602 s) and lookup tables (19 s). These findings highlight the potential of deep neural network enhanced filtering techniques to significantly improve state of charge estimation accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":599,"journal":{"name":"Ionics","volume":"31 4","pages":"3341 - 3361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and comparison of SOC estimation techniques for Li-ion batteries\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed R. Zaki,&nbsp;Mohamed A. El-Beltagy,&nbsp;Ahmed E. Hammad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11581-025-06140-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in the automotive INDUSTRY for their high energy density. Accurate state of charge estimation is essential for optimizing battery performance and longevity. This study utilizes a third-order resistance–capacitance equivalent circuit model with parameters estimated via MATLAB/Simulink Simscape. Four state of charge estimation methods: Coulomb counting, Extended Kalman filter, Unscented Kalman filter, and Extended Kalman-Bucy filter are evaluated. Extended Kalman-Bucy filter demonstrated the highest accuracy (Mean Absolute Error = 0.008%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.01%) but required the longest computation time (32.938 s), whereas Coulomb counting was the fastest (6.237 s) but least accurate (Mean Absolute Error = 0.0445%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.0548%). To enhance state of charge estimation, a deep neural network is designed to predict equivalent circuit model parameters based on state of charge and temperature. The deep neural network predictions were integrated into the Extended Kalman-Bucy filter using two strategies: Direct Integration and Fusion Integration. The Fusion method demonstrated the best performance (Mean Absolute Error = 0.12%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.15%) but had a higher execution time (605 s) compared to Direct Integration (602 s) and lookup tables (19 s). These findings highlight the potential of deep neural network enhanced filtering techniques to significantly improve state of charge estimation accuracy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ionics\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"3341 - 3361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-025-06140-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ionics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-025-06140-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

锂离子电池因其高能量密度在汽车工业中至关重要。准确的充电状态估计对于优化电池性能和寿命至关重要。本研究采用三阶电阻-电容等效电路模型,并通过MATLAB/Simulink Simscape进行参数估计。评价了四种电荷状态估计方法:库仑计数法、扩展卡尔曼滤波法、Unscented卡尔曼滤波法和扩展卡尔曼-布西滤波法。扩展Kalman-Bucy滤波精度最高(Mean Absolute Error = 0.008%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.01%),但需要最长的计算时间(32.938 s),而库仑计数速度最快(6.237 s),但精度最低(Mean Absolute Error = 0.0445%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.0548%)。为了增强电荷状态估计,设计了一种基于电荷状态和温度的深度神经网络来预测等效电路模型参数。采用直接积分和融合积分两种策略将深度神经网络预测结果集成到扩展卡尔曼-布西滤波器中。融合方法表现出最好的性能(平均绝对误差= 0.12%,均方根误差= 0.15%),但与直接集成(602秒)和查找表(19秒)相比,具有更高的执行时间(605秒)。这些发现突出了深度神经网络增强滤波技术在显著提高电荷状态估计精度方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis and comparison of SOC estimation techniques for Li-ion batteries

Analysis and comparison of SOC estimation techniques for Li-ion batteries

Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in the automotive INDUSTRY for their high energy density. Accurate state of charge estimation is essential for optimizing battery performance and longevity. This study utilizes a third-order resistance–capacitance equivalent circuit model with parameters estimated via MATLAB/Simulink Simscape. Four state of charge estimation methods: Coulomb counting, Extended Kalman filter, Unscented Kalman filter, and Extended Kalman-Bucy filter are evaluated. Extended Kalman-Bucy filter demonstrated the highest accuracy (Mean Absolute Error = 0.008%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.01%) but required the longest computation time (32.938 s), whereas Coulomb counting was the fastest (6.237 s) but least accurate (Mean Absolute Error = 0.0445%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.0548%). To enhance state of charge estimation, a deep neural network is designed to predict equivalent circuit model parameters based on state of charge and temperature. The deep neural network predictions were integrated into the Extended Kalman-Bucy filter using two strategies: Direct Integration and Fusion Integration. The Fusion method demonstrated the best performance (Mean Absolute Error = 0.12%, Root Mean Square Error = 0.15%) but had a higher execution time (605 s) compared to Direct Integration (602 s) and lookup tables (19 s). These findings highlight the potential of deep neural network enhanced filtering techniques to significantly improve state of charge estimation accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ionics
Ionics 化学-电化学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Ionics is publishing original results in the fields of science and technology of ionic motion. This includes theoretical, experimental and practical work on electrolytes, electrode, ionic/electronic interfaces, ionic transport aspects of corrosion, galvanic cells, e.g. for thermodynamic and kinetic studies, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and electrochromics. Fast solid ionic conductors are presently providing new opportunities in view of several advantages, in addition to conventional liquid electrolytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信