基于成本效益的多目标生态系统服务优化——以陕北地区为例

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ting Li , Jing Huang , Liyang Ma , Shuhua Zhang , Yanjiao Ren , Yadong Yang
{"title":"基于成本效益的多目标生态系统服务优化——以陕北地区为例","authors":"Ting Li ,&nbsp;Jing Huang ,&nbsp;Liyang Ma ,&nbsp;Shuhua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanjiao Ren ,&nbsp;Yadong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of vegetation restoration on ecosystem services (ESs) is a critical focus in the study of water-soil process for dryland areas. However, limited funding poses practical challenges in configuring restoration measures for achieving multi-objective optimization of water-soil resources. This study selected Northern Shaanxi, a pilot area of the Grain to Green Program (GTGP) in China, as a case study area and conducted field surveys on vegetation restoration and protection activities. On this basis, four scenarios with different weights or budgets were developed to optimize three water-soil ESs: baseflow regulation, phosphorus retention, and soil conservation. Using the Resource Investment Optimization System model (RIOS) model, which integrates watershed water-soil process and investment information, we simulated spatial portfolios of restoration activity and assessed their performance on the three ESs in future. The results indicated that forest tending and disaster prevention were critical for optimizing the three ESs, with the budgets of these two activities exceeding 70 % in all four scenarios. When the budget was increased, Ecological scenario 2 offered a more cost-effective approach to enhance ESs that simultaneously mitigate trade-offs among the three ESs. Under this scenario, the trade-offs between baseflow regulation and phosphorus retention, baseflow regulation and soil conservation, and phosphorus retention and soil conservation would decrease by 12.12 %, 31.43 %, and 15.38 %, respectively. However, current restoration measures alone are inadequate to meet future ecological or policy requirements for ES enhancements. By 2035, the area of phosphorus retention is expected to decline by a range of 14.84 % to 32.54 % under the four scenarios, with these areas of decline all located in the ‘blank zone’ of restoration activities. And none of the four scenarios could ensure the stability of soil conservation in aeolian-loess transitional areas. This study highlights the urgent need for implementing conservation agriculture practices and diversified restoration measures to ensure the long-term effectiveness of improving water-soil ESs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adopting cost-effective restoration portfolios for multi-objective ecosystem service optimization: A case study from Northern Shaanxi, China\",\"authors\":\"Ting Li ,&nbsp;Jing Huang ,&nbsp;Liyang Ma ,&nbsp;Shuhua Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanjiao Ren ,&nbsp;Yadong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impact of vegetation restoration on ecosystem services (ESs) is a critical focus in the study of water-soil process for dryland areas. However, limited funding poses practical challenges in configuring restoration measures for achieving multi-objective optimization of water-soil resources. This study selected Northern Shaanxi, a pilot area of the Grain to Green Program (GTGP) in China, as a case study area and conducted field surveys on vegetation restoration and protection activities. On this basis, four scenarios with different weights or budgets were developed to optimize three water-soil ESs: baseflow regulation, phosphorus retention, and soil conservation. Using the Resource Investment Optimization System model (RIOS) model, which integrates watershed water-soil process and investment information, we simulated spatial portfolios of restoration activity and assessed their performance on the three ESs in future. The results indicated that forest tending and disaster prevention were critical for optimizing the three ESs, with the budgets of these two activities exceeding 70 % in all four scenarios. When the budget was increased, Ecological scenario 2 offered a more cost-effective approach to enhance ESs that simultaneously mitigate trade-offs among the three ESs. Under this scenario, the trade-offs between baseflow regulation and phosphorus retention, baseflow regulation and soil conservation, and phosphorus retention and soil conservation would decrease by 12.12 %, 31.43 %, and 15.38 %, respectively. However, current restoration measures alone are inadequate to meet future ecological or policy requirements for ES enhancements. By 2035, the area of phosphorus retention is expected to decline by a range of 14.84 % to 32.54 % under the four scenarios, with these areas of decline all located in the ‘blank zone’ of restoration activities. And none of the four scenarios could ensure the stability of soil conservation in aeolian-loess transitional areas. This study highlights the urgent need for implementing conservation agriculture practices and diversified restoration measures to ensure the long-term effectiveness of improving water-soil ESs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001107\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植被恢复对生态系统服务功能的影响是旱地水土过程研究的一个重要内容。然而,由于资金有限,在配置修复措施以实现水土资源多目标优化方面面临着现实挑战。本研究选择中国退耕还林工程试点地区陕北为案例研究区,开展了植被恢复与保护活动的实地调查。在此基础上,构建了4种不同权重或预算的情景,以优化基流调节、磷保持和土壤保持3种水土ESs。利用整合流域水土过程和投资信息的资源投资优化系统模型(RIOS),模拟了流域水土恢复活动的空间组合,并对其未来在三个ESs上的表现进行了评价。结果表明,森林抚育和防灾是优化3种情景的关键,在所有4种情景中,这两项活动的预算均超过70%。当预算增加时,生态情景2提供了一种更具成本效益的方法来提高生态环境,同时减轻了三个生态环境之间的权衡。在此情景下,基流调节与磷保持、基流调节与土壤保持、磷保持与土壤保持之间的权衡将分别降低12.12%、31.43%和15.38%。然而,目前的恢复措施本身不足以满足未来生态或政策对改善生态环境的要求。预计到2035年,4种情景下的磷滞留面积下降幅度在14.84% ~ 32.54%之间,且下降区域均位于恢复活动的“空白区”。4种方案均不能保证风沙-黄土过渡区土壤保持的稳定性。本研究强调,迫切需要实施保护性农业措施和多样化的恢复措施,以确保改善水土资源的长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adopting cost-effective restoration portfolios for multi-objective ecosystem service optimization: A case study from Northern Shaanxi, China
The impact of vegetation restoration on ecosystem services (ESs) is a critical focus in the study of water-soil process for dryland areas. However, limited funding poses practical challenges in configuring restoration measures for achieving multi-objective optimization of water-soil resources. This study selected Northern Shaanxi, a pilot area of the Grain to Green Program (GTGP) in China, as a case study area and conducted field surveys on vegetation restoration and protection activities. On this basis, four scenarios with different weights or budgets were developed to optimize three water-soil ESs: baseflow regulation, phosphorus retention, and soil conservation. Using the Resource Investment Optimization System model (RIOS) model, which integrates watershed water-soil process and investment information, we simulated spatial portfolios of restoration activity and assessed their performance on the three ESs in future. The results indicated that forest tending and disaster prevention were critical for optimizing the three ESs, with the budgets of these two activities exceeding 70 % in all four scenarios. When the budget was increased, Ecological scenario 2 offered a more cost-effective approach to enhance ESs that simultaneously mitigate trade-offs among the three ESs. Under this scenario, the trade-offs between baseflow regulation and phosphorus retention, baseflow regulation and soil conservation, and phosphorus retention and soil conservation would decrease by 12.12 %, 31.43 %, and 15.38 %, respectively. However, current restoration measures alone are inadequate to meet future ecological or policy requirements for ES enhancements. By 2035, the area of phosphorus retention is expected to decline by a range of 14.84 % to 32.54 % under the four scenarios, with these areas of decline all located in the ‘blank zone’ of restoration activities. And none of the four scenarios could ensure the stability of soil conservation in aeolian-loess transitional areas. This study highlights the urgent need for implementing conservation agriculture practices and diversified restoration measures to ensure the long-term effectiveness of improving water-soil ESs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信