Efficacy of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations, notably epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase, shows reduced sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. A subgroup analysis of the IMpower150 data on patients resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) before enrollment demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) over bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. However, due to the exploratory nature and small sample size, the efficacy of ABCP post-EGFR-TKI failure is still debated. We evaluated ABCP therapy against other platinum-based regimens without immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of effectiveness and toxicity.

Methods

Data from patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or ABCP at five Japanese hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching compared efficacy outcomes, including overall response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS.

Results

Of 183 EGFR mutation carriers, 33 underwent ABCP therapy, while 150 received platinum-based chemotherapy. Following propensity score matching, 32 and 74 patients were analyzed. In the ABCP group, median PFS and OS were 6.8 and 16.7 months compared to 5.8 and 25.7 months with platinum-based chemotherapy, showing no significant differences in PFS (p = 0.46) and OS (p = 0.85). In liver metastases, ABCP yielded a median PFS of 9.9 versus 6.1 months and an ORR of 62.5 % versus 35.7 % relative to platinum-based chemotherapy, without statistical significance (PFS p = 0.16; ORR p = 0.70).

Conclusion

Compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, ABCP did not improve effectiveness in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure.