优化设计参数和3d打印方向,提高增材制造中拓扑优化部件的效率

Dame Alemayehu Efa, Dejene Alemayehu Ifa
{"title":"优化设计参数和3d打印方向,提高增材制造中拓扑优化部件的效率","authors":"Dame Alemayehu Efa,&nbsp;Dejene Alemayehu Ifa","doi":"10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computer-aided design (CAD) is revolutionizing 3D object production in Additive Manufacturing (AM), especially enhancing the creation of complex optimized structures. However, due to the difficulties of testing the thickness or size of structural components using physical testing in topology-optimized parts, optimizing parts for high efficiency remains a significant challenge. In addition to optimizing 3D printing orientation, this study uses Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and optimization algorithms to optimize design parameters such as safety factor and thickness for predicting stress and deformation in topology optimization. The results show that RSM, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and observed simulation results strongly correlate, confirming their reliability for determining the most optimal design parameters for topology optimization. Maximum displacement and Von-Mises stress at 0.101 mm and 29.1 MPa were found to be the optimal responses. In contrast, the optimum input parameters include a minimum safety factor of 1.2, a minimum thickness of 3.85 mm, and a maximum thickness of 8.42 mm, which are identified for optimal topology optimization using Genetic Algorithms (GA). These results were verified using optimization software, confirming the effectiveness of the study's methodology. Vertical orientation is the optimal printing orientation to develop parts with greater hardness, according to X-ray Diffraction (XRD), hardness, wear resistance, and morphological tests. Testing confirmed that the topology-optimized result, which utilized the most optimal process condition and orientation, effectively produced a stronger 3D-printed part. Therefore, this method saves material and the time waste usually caused by trial and error by predicting the optimal 3D printing orientation and design parameters in providing more effective and intended results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101087,"journal":{"name":"Results in Materials","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of design parameters and 3D-printing orientation to enhance the efficiency of topology-optimized components in additive manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Dame Alemayehu Efa,&nbsp;Dejene Alemayehu Ifa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rinma.2025.100702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Computer-aided design (CAD) is revolutionizing 3D object production in Additive Manufacturing (AM), especially enhancing the creation of complex optimized structures. However, due to the difficulties of testing the thickness or size of structural components using physical testing in topology-optimized parts, optimizing parts for high efficiency remains a significant challenge. In addition to optimizing 3D printing orientation, this study uses Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and optimization algorithms to optimize design parameters such as safety factor and thickness for predicting stress and deformation in topology optimization. The results show that RSM, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and observed simulation results strongly correlate, confirming their reliability for determining the most optimal design parameters for topology optimization. Maximum displacement and Von-Mises stress at 0.101 mm and 29.1 MPa were found to be the optimal responses. In contrast, the optimum input parameters include a minimum safety factor of 1.2, a minimum thickness of 3.85 mm, and a maximum thickness of 8.42 mm, which are identified for optimal topology optimization using Genetic Algorithms (GA). These results were verified using optimization software, confirming the effectiveness of the study's methodology. Vertical orientation is the optimal printing orientation to develop parts with greater hardness, according to X-ray Diffraction (XRD), hardness, wear resistance, and morphological tests. Testing confirmed that the topology-optimized result, which utilized the most optimal process condition and orientation, effectively produced a stronger 3D-printed part. Therefore, this method saves material and the time waste usually caused by trial and error by predicting the optimal 3D printing orientation and design parameters in providing more effective and intended results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Materials\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X25000470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X25000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机辅助设计(CAD)正在彻底改变增材制造(AM)中的3D对象生产,特别是增强了复杂优化结构的创建。然而,由于在拓扑优化零件中使用物理测试来测试结构部件的厚度或尺寸存在困难,因此优化零件以实现高效率仍然是一个重大挑战。除了优化3D打印方向外,本研究还利用响应面法(Response Surface Methodology, RSM)和优化算法对拓扑优化中预测应力和变形的安全系数、厚度等设计参数进行优化。结果表明,RSM、人工神经网络(ANN)和实测仿真结果具有较强的相关性,证实了它们在确定拓扑优化最优设计参数方面的可靠性。最大位移和Von-Mises应力分别为0.101 mm和29.1 MPa。采用遗传算法(GA)确定了最小安全系数为1.2,最小厚度为3.85 mm,最大厚度为8.42 mm的最优输入参数。使用优化软件验证了这些结果,证实了研究方法的有效性。根据x射线衍射(XRD)、硬度、耐磨性和形貌测试,垂直方向是开发具有更高硬度零件的最佳打印方向。测试证实,拓扑优化的结果,利用最优的工艺条件和方向,有效地生产出更强的3d打印部件。因此,该方法通过预测最佳3D打印方向和设计参数来提供更有效和预期的结果,从而节省了通常由试错引起的材料和时间浪费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of design parameters and 3D-printing orientation to enhance the efficiency of topology-optimized components in additive manufacturing
Computer-aided design (CAD) is revolutionizing 3D object production in Additive Manufacturing (AM), especially enhancing the creation of complex optimized structures. However, due to the difficulties of testing the thickness or size of structural components using physical testing in topology-optimized parts, optimizing parts for high efficiency remains a significant challenge. In addition to optimizing 3D printing orientation, this study uses Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and optimization algorithms to optimize design parameters such as safety factor and thickness for predicting stress and deformation in topology optimization. The results show that RSM, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and observed simulation results strongly correlate, confirming their reliability for determining the most optimal design parameters for topology optimization. Maximum displacement and Von-Mises stress at 0.101 mm and 29.1 MPa were found to be the optimal responses. In contrast, the optimum input parameters include a minimum safety factor of 1.2, a minimum thickness of 3.85 mm, and a maximum thickness of 8.42 mm, which are identified for optimal topology optimization using Genetic Algorithms (GA). These results were verified using optimization software, confirming the effectiveness of the study's methodology. Vertical orientation is the optimal printing orientation to develop parts with greater hardness, according to X-ray Diffraction (XRD), hardness, wear resistance, and morphological tests. Testing confirmed that the topology-optimized result, which utilized the most optimal process condition and orientation, effectively produced a stronger 3D-printed part. Therefore, this method saves material and the time waste usually caused by trial and error by predicting the optimal 3D printing orientation and design parameters in providing more effective and intended results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信