了解澳大利亚大墨尔本不同人口集群中城市自行车走廊对自行车模式共享的影响

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Afshin Jafari, Steve Pemberton, Dhirendra Singh, Tayebeh Saghapour, Alan Both, Lucy Gunn, Billie Giles-Corti
{"title":"了解澳大利亚大墨尔本不同人口集群中城市自行车走廊对自行车模式共享的影响","authors":"Afshin Jafari, Steve Pemberton, Dhirendra Singh, Tayebeh Saghapour, Alan Both, Lucy Gunn, Billie Giles-Corti","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10599-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In car-dominated cities like Melbourne, Australia, limited data on cyclists’ travel patterns and socio-demographic differences complicate understanding of the effectiveness of infrastructure investment interventions aimed at promoting cycling. Recent advancements in city-scale transport modelling enable virtual testing of such interventions. However, the application of agent- and activity-based models for large-scale cycling simulations has been constrained by data and complexity. In this study, we developed a city-scale agent-based simulation model for Greater Melbourne to evaluate changes in travel mode share from cycling infrastructure modifications. We clustered bicycle riders into five demographic groups: Maverick Males, Motivated Adults, Conscientious Commuters, Young Sprinters, and Relaxed Cruisers, estimating mode choice parameters for each group. Using aggregated smartphone application data, we developed a cycling trip routing methodology to incorporate road infrastructure impacts. Results indicated that travel time significantly influences mode choice across all clusters. Cycling infrastructure was crucial for four clusters, and travel cost influenced four clusters. The calibrated model assessed the potential impact of fully implementing Greater Melbourne’s strategic cycling corridors, a network of key cycling routes. Simulations suggested an initial 30% increase in cycling use, raising the mode share to approximately 2.6%, indicating a modest overall impact. Further analysis showed that even with full implementation, on average about half of the lengths of the routed bikeable trips would still occur on roads without any cycling infrastructure. This underscores the need to improve infrastructure on both major corridors and minor roads, and to complement these improvements with behavioural interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the impact of city-wide cycling corridors on cycling mode share among different demographic clusters in Greater Melbourne, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Afshin Jafari, Steve Pemberton, Dhirendra Singh, Tayebeh Saghapour, Alan Both, Lucy Gunn, Billie Giles-Corti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-025-10599-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In car-dominated cities like Melbourne, Australia, limited data on cyclists’ travel patterns and socio-demographic differences complicate understanding of the effectiveness of infrastructure investment interventions aimed at promoting cycling. Recent advancements in city-scale transport modelling enable virtual testing of such interventions. However, the application of agent- and activity-based models for large-scale cycling simulations has been constrained by data and complexity. In this study, we developed a city-scale agent-based simulation model for Greater Melbourne to evaluate changes in travel mode share from cycling infrastructure modifications. We clustered bicycle riders into five demographic groups: Maverick Males, Motivated Adults, Conscientious Commuters, Young Sprinters, and Relaxed Cruisers, estimating mode choice parameters for each group. Using aggregated smartphone application data, we developed a cycling trip routing methodology to incorporate road infrastructure impacts. Results indicated that travel time significantly influences mode choice across all clusters. Cycling infrastructure was crucial for four clusters, and travel cost influenced four clusters. The calibrated model assessed the potential impact of fully implementing Greater Melbourne’s strategic cycling corridors, a network of key cycling routes. Simulations suggested an initial 30% increase in cycling use, raising the mode share to approximately 2.6%, indicating a modest overall impact. Further analysis showed that even with full implementation, on average about half of the lengths of the routed bikeable trips would still occur on roads without any cycling infrastructure. This underscores the need to improve infrastructure on both major corridors and minor roads, and to complement these improvements with behavioural interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10599-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10599-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚墨尔本等以汽车为主的城市,关于骑自行车者出行模式和社会人口差异的有限数据,使人们难以理解旨在促进骑自行车的基础设施投资干预措施的有效性。城市规模交通建模的最新进展使此类干预措施能够进行虚拟测试。然而,基于主体和基于活动的模型在大规模循环模拟中的应用受到数据和复杂性的限制。在这项研究中,我们为大墨尔本开发了一个城市尺度的基于主体的模拟模型,以评估自行车基础设施改造对出行方式份额的影响。我们将骑自行车的人分成五组:特立独行的男性、积极的成年人、认真的通勤者、年轻的短跑运动员和放松的巡车者,估计每组的模式选择参数。利用汇总的智能手机应用程序数据,我们开发了一种自行车旅行路线方法,以纳入道路基础设施的影响。结果表明,出行时间显著影响所有集群的出行方式选择。自行车基础设施对四个集群至关重要,出行成本影响四个集群。经过校准的模型评估了全面实施大墨尔本战略自行车走廊(主要自行车路线网络)的潜在影响。模拟表明,最初的循环使用增加了30%,将模式份额提高到约2.6%,表明总体影响不大。进一步的分析表明,即使全面实施,平均约有一半的骑行路程仍将发生在没有任何自行车基础设施的道路上。这强调需要改善主要走廊和次要道路的基础设施,并通过行为干预来补充这些改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the impact of city-wide cycling corridors on cycling mode share among different demographic clusters in Greater Melbourne, Australia

In car-dominated cities like Melbourne, Australia, limited data on cyclists’ travel patterns and socio-demographic differences complicate understanding of the effectiveness of infrastructure investment interventions aimed at promoting cycling. Recent advancements in city-scale transport modelling enable virtual testing of such interventions. However, the application of agent- and activity-based models for large-scale cycling simulations has been constrained by data and complexity. In this study, we developed a city-scale agent-based simulation model for Greater Melbourne to evaluate changes in travel mode share from cycling infrastructure modifications. We clustered bicycle riders into five demographic groups: Maverick Males, Motivated Adults, Conscientious Commuters, Young Sprinters, and Relaxed Cruisers, estimating mode choice parameters for each group. Using aggregated smartphone application data, we developed a cycling trip routing methodology to incorporate road infrastructure impacts. Results indicated that travel time significantly influences mode choice across all clusters. Cycling infrastructure was crucial for four clusters, and travel cost influenced four clusters. The calibrated model assessed the potential impact of fully implementing Greater Melbourne’s strategic cycling corridors, a network of key cycling routes. Simulations suggested an initial 30% increase in cycling use, raising the mode share to approximately 2.6%, indicating a modest overall impact. Further analysis showed that even with full implementation, on average about half of the lengths of the routed bikeable trips would still occur on roads without any cycling infrastructure. This underscores the need to improve infrastructure on both major corridors and minor roads, and to complement these improvements with behavioural interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信