Hatice Ataş, Tuğba Atak, Selda Pelin Kartal, Gamze Tas Aygar
{"title":"C反应蛋白与白蛋白比率与扁平苔藓的关系","authors":"Hatice Ataş, Tuğba Atak, Selda Pelin Kartal, Gamze Tas Aygar","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20241166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In some diseases associated with inflammation, the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio can be used as a biomarker of inflammation. Since lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and disease activity and whether it plays a role in determining disease prognosis, and compare them with those in subjects without lichen planus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study. Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory measures, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, platelet counts, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, albumin, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio were statistically compared between patients with lichen planus (n=61) and controls (n=64).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Albumin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<0.001), C-reactive protein (p=0.017), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.016), and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02) were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.003, OR 1.2), neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02, OR 1.4), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.003, OR 1.1) were effective in differentiating patients from the healthy group. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate>4.5 mm/h, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio>0.6, and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio>1 were useful in showing disease activity, of which C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has the best value with 92% sensitivity. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has a sensitivity of 100% and is more effective and sensitive than other markers in distinguishing between mild and severe groups and between single and multiple involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio levels may be considered a potential marker for lichen planus. It may be highly sensitive to follow-up of systemic inflammation and disease activity in patients with lichen planus. However, further prospective studies may confirm the association between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lichen planus.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":"71 2","pages":"e20241166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio wıth lichen planus.\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Ataş, Tuğba Atak, Selda Pelin Kartal, Gamze Tas Aygar\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20241166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In some diseases associated with inflammation, the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio can be used as a biomarker of inflammation. Since lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and disease activity and whether it plays a role in determining disease prognosis, and compare them with those in subjects without lichen planus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study. Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory measures, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, platelet counts, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, albumin, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio were statistically compared between patients with lichen planus (n=61) and controls (n=64).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Albumin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<0.001), C-reactive protein (p=0.017), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.016), and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02) were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.003, OR 1.2), neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02, OR 1.4), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.003, OR 1.1) were effective in differentiating patients from the healthy group. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate>4.5 mm/h, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio>0.6, and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio>1 were useful in showing disease activity, of which C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has the best value with 92% sensitivity. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has a sensitivity of 100% and is more effective and sensitive than other markers in distinguishing between mild and severe groups and between single and multiple involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio levels may be considered a potential marker for lichen planus. It may be highly sensitive to follow-up of systemic inflammation and disease activity in patients with lichen planus. However, further prospective studies may confirm the association between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lichen planus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"e20241166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20241166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20241166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The association of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio wıth lichen planus.
Objective: In some diseases associated with inflammation, the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio can be used as a biomarker of inflammation. Since lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and disease activity and whether it plays a role in determining disease prognosis, and compare them with those in subjects without lichen planus.
Methods: This is a case-control study. Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory measures, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, platelet counts, neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, albumin, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio were statistically compared between patients with lichen planus (n=61) and controls (n=64).
Results: Albumin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<0.001), C-reactive protein (p=0.017), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.016), and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02) were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (p=0.003, OR 1.2), neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.02, OR 1.4), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.003, OR 1.1) were effective in differentiating patients from the healthy group. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate>4.5 mm/h, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio>0.6, and neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio>1 were useful in showing disease activity, of which C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has the best value with 92% sensitivity. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio has a sensitivity of 100% and is more effective and sensitive than other markers in distinguishing between mild and severe groups and between single and multiple involvement.
Conclusion: Elevated C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio levels may be considered a potential marker for lichen planus. It may be highly sensitive to follow-up of systemic inflammation and disease activity in patients with lichen planus. However, further prospective studies may confirm the association between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lichen planus.