非即刻加载牙种植体初级稳定性的意义:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8
Nahal Razaghi, Thomas Gill, Anuya Patankar, Aviva Petrie, Shakeel Shahdad
{"title":"非即刻加载牙种植体初级稳定性的意义:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nahal Razaghi, Thomas Gill, Anuya Patankar, Aviva Petrie, Shakeel Shahdad","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the significance of primary stability, as measured by insertion torque (IT) and/or implant stability quotient (ISQ), in achieving osseointegration of nonimmediately loaded implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they measured IT and/ or ISQ at time of placement and reported survival for up to 1 year. For studies where at least one implant failed, a random effects meta-analysis was carried out for the odds of survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3,431 publications were screened, and 79 were accepted for analysis. These included 28 RCTs, 12 CCTs, 10 cohort studies, and 29 case series. Overall, 21 studies provided individual implant data for a total of 1,413 implants, and 7 studies were included for meta-analysis. A total of 264 implants were placed with ISQ < 60 and 249 with IT < 35. Survival of implants placed with ISQ < 60 and IT < 35 were 97.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis found no evidence that an ISQ ≥ 60 was less likely to fail compared to ISQ < 60 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.75, P = .31), or that an IT ≥ 35 resulted in higher odds of failure compared to IT < 35 (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.40, P = .84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no evidence to support that an IT ≥ 35 or ISQ ≥ 60 for nonimmediately loaded implants results in higher survival than those below these values.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"457-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of Primary Stability in Nonimmediately Loaded Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nahal Razaghi, Thomas Gill, Anuya Patankar, Aviva Petrie, Shakeel Shahdad\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the significance of primary stability, as measured by insertion torque (IT) and/or implant stability quotient (ISQ), in achieving osseointegration of nonimmediately loaded implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they measured IT and/ or ISQ at time of placement and reported survival for up to 1 year. For studies where at least one implant failed, a random effects meta-analysis was carried out for the odds of survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3,431 publications were screened, and 79 were accepted for analysis. These included 28 RCTs, 12 CCTs, 10 cohort studies, and 29 case series. Overall, 21 studies provided individual implant data for a total of 1,413 implants, and 7 studies were included for meta-analysis. A total of 264 implants were placed with ISQ < 60 and 249 with IT < 35. Survival of implants placed with ISQ < 60 and IT < 35 were 97.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis found no evidence that an ISQ ≥ 60 was less likely to fail compared to ISQ < 60 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.75, P = .31), or that an IT ≥ 35 resulted in higher odds of failure compared to IT < 35 (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.40, P = .84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found no evidence to support that an IT ≥ 35 or ISQ ≥ 60 for nonimmediately loaded implants results in higher survival than those below these values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"457-482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:初级稳定性被认为是立即加载种植体骨整合的关键。然而,没有证据表明这对早期或延迟加载的协议是否同样重要。本系统综述旨在确定初级稳定性的重要性,通过插入扭矩(IT)和/或种植体稳定商(ISQ)测量,实现非即刻加载种植体的骨整合。材料与方法:检索三个电子数据库。如果研究在安置时测量了IT和/或ISQ,并报告了长达1年的生存期,则纳入研究。对于至少一次植入失败的研究,对生存几率进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:共筛选出版物3431篇;79例接受分析。这些研究包括28项随机对照试验、12项有条件对照试验、10项队列研究和29个病例系列。21项研究提供了总共1413个种植体的单个种植体数据。纳入7项研究进行荟萃分析。结论:本研究没有发现证据支持IT≥35或ISQ≥60的非立即加载种植体比低于这些值的种植体存活率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significance of Primary Stability in Nonimmediately Loaded Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Purpose: To determine the significance of primary stability, as measured by insertion torque (IT) and/or implant stability quotient (ISQ), in achieving osseointegration of nonimmediately loaded implants.

Materials and methods: Three electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they measured IT and/ or ISQ at time of placement and reported survival for up to 1 year. For studies where at least one implant failed, a random effects meta-analysis was carried out for the odds of survival.

Results: In total, 3,431 publications were screened, and 79 were accepted for analysis. These included 28 RCTs, 12 CCTs, 10 cohort studies, and 29 case series. Overall, 21 studies provided individual implant data for a total of 1,413 implants, and 7 studies were included for meta-analysis. A total of 264 implants were placed with ISQ < 60 and 249 with IT < 35. Survival of implants placed with ISQ < 60 and IT < 35 were 97.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis found no evidence that an ISQ ≥ 60 was less likely to fail compared to ISQ < 60 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.75, P = .31), or that an IT ≥ 35 resulted in higher odds of failure compared to IT < 35 (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.40, P = .84).

Conclusions: This study found no evidence to support that an IT ≥ 35 or ISQ ≥ 60 for nonimmediately loaded implants results in higher survival than those below these values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信