Gustavo Bono Yoshikawa, Gabriella Giandotti Gomar, Giovanna Ceccatto Gadens, Beatriz França Zanetti Saes, Maria Eduarda Andrade Galiciolli, Meire Ellen Pereira, Quelen Iane Garlet, Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira
{"title":"口腔粘膜移植尿道成形术后再狭窄:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gustavo Bono Yoshikawa, Gabriella Giandotti Gomar, Giovanna Ceccatto Gadens, Beatriz França Zanetti Saes, Maria Eduarda Andrade Galiciolli, Meire Ellen Pereira, Quelen Iane Garlet, Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/acb403525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine risk factors for re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMGU) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we collected data from PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria included studies with male patients over 18 years old with urethral stricture recurrence after BMGU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 646 papers from three electronic databases. Records that did not meet the eligibility criteria and duplicates were excluded, resulting in 14 papers (3,240 patients) that underwent qualitative analysis, from which nine papers were suitable for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis identified diabetes mellitus (relative risk - RR: 1.58 [95% confidence interval - 95%CI 1.02-2.46];p = 0.04), penile/peno-bulbar site (RR: 1.57 [95%CI 1.04-2.37]; p = 0.03), and stricture size higher than 7 cm (RR: 4.13 [95%CI 2.42-7.04]; p 0.00001) as a predictive factor of re-stricture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings may improve understanding the risk factors for this type of urethroplasty and help surgical decisions. For a more effective analysis, larger and better-distributed study groups and cohorts are needed in the future to clarify whether the combination of a previous disease and the urethroplasty etiology may impact a recurrence-free outcome after stricture correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"40 ","pages":"e403525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Bono Yoshikawa, Gabriella Giandotti Gomar, Giovanna Ceccatto Gadens, Beatriz França Zanetti Saes, Maria Eduarda Andrade Galiciolli, Meire Ellen Pereira, Quelen Iane Garlet, Cláudia Sirlene Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/acb403525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine risk factors for re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMGU) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we collected data from PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria included studies with male patients over 18 years old with urethral stricture recurrence after BMGU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 646 papers from three electronic databases. Records that did not meet the eligibility criteria and duplicates were excluded, resulting in 14 papers (3,240 patients) that underwent qualitative analysis, from which nine papers were suitable for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis identified diabetes mellitus (relative risk - RR: 1.58 [95% confidence interval - 95%CI 1.02-2.46];p = 0.04), penile/peno-bulbar site (RR: 1.57 [95%CI 1.04-2.37]; p = 0.03), and stricture size higher than 7 cm (RR: 4.13 [95%CI 2.42-7.04]; p 0.00001) as a predictive factor of re-stricture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings may improve understanding the risk factors for this type of urethroplasty and help surgical decisions. For a more effective analysis, larger and better-distributed study groups and cohorts are needed in the future to clarify whether the combination of a previous disease and the urethroplasty etiology may impact a recurrence-free outcome after stricture correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta cirurgica brasileira\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"e403525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta cirurgica brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb403525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb403525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定颊粘膜移植尿道成形术(BMGU)后再狭窄的危险因素。方法:按照PRISMA指南,我们从PubMed、SciELO和Web of Science数据库中收集数据。入选标准包括18岁以上男性BMGU术后尿道狭窄复发患者。结果:从3个电子数据库中检索到论文646篇。排除了不符合入选标准和重复的记录,有14篇论文(3240例患者)进行了定性分析,其中9篇论文适合进行meta分析。meta分析确定糖尿病(相对危险度- RR: 1.58[95%可信区间- 95% ci 1.02-2.46];p = 0.04)、阴茎/阴茎球部位(RR: 1.57 [95% ci 1.04-2.37];p = 0.03),狭窄尺寸大于7 cm (RR: 4.13 [95%CI 2.42-7.04];P 0.00001)作为再狭窄的预测因素。结论:这些发现有助于了解此类尿道成形术的危险因素,并有助于手术决策。为了进行更有效的分析,未来需要更大、分布更好的研究小组和队列来阐明既往疾病和尿道成形术病因的结合是否会影响狭窄矫正后无复发的结果。
Re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: To determine risk factors for re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMGU) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we collected data from PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria included studies with male patients over 18 years old with urethral stricture recurrence after BMGU.
Results: We retrieved 646 papers from three electronic databases. Records that did not meet the eligibility criteria and duplicates were excluded, resulting in 14 papers (3,240 patients) that underwent qualitative analysis, from which nine papers were suitable for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis identified diabetes mellitus (relative risk - RR: 1.58 [95% confidence interval - 95%CI 1.02-2.46];p = 0.04), penile/peno-bulbar site (RR: 1.57 [95%CI 1.04-2.37]; p = 0.03), and stricture size higher than 7 cm (RR: 4.13 [95%CI 2.42-7.04]; p 0.00001) as a predictive factor of re-stricture.
Conclusions: These findings may improve understanding the risk factors for this type of urethroplasty and help surgical decisions. For a more effective analysis, larger and better-distributed study groups and cohorts are needed in the future to clarify whether the combination of a previous disease and the urethroplasty etiology may impact a recurrence-free outcome after stricture correction.