IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Adeolu Funso Oladunjoye, Syed Murtaza, Isabel Draper, Robin Livingston
{"title":"Sociodemographic Patterns of Electroconvulsive Therapy Referral and Utilization in a Tertiary Health Care Facility.","authors":"Adeolu Funso Oladunjoye, Syed Murtaza, Isabel Draper, Robin Livingston","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite electroconvulsive therapy's (ECT) proven effectiveness in various psychiatric conditions, ECT referral and utilization remains suboptimal. This study sought to examine the pattern of ECT referral and utilization at a tertiary care center and to assess factors contributing to the underutilization of ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients referred to ECT at this facility from 2022-2023 (N = 76, ≥18 y/o) with demographic data obtained from the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients were referred for ECT, with 35 receiving treatments. The treated group had a slightly younger mean age (45.5 vs 46.2 years). Gender distribution varied, with more males receiving ECT (54.3%) and more females declining (70.7%). Whites were the majority in both groups, but Blacks were less likely to receive ECT (14 not treated vs 4 treated), while Hispanics were more likely to be treated (2 not treated vs 7 treated). Declining ECT was more frequent among Whites (61.9%) and Blacks (33.3%), while transportation and logistical issues affected various racial groups with the highest impact on Blacks (42.9%). Major depressive disorder was the primary diagnosis, evenly distributed between treated and nontreated patients. In comparison to state data, Blacks and Asians showed a higher representation among the treatment group with those treated with ECT, 11.4% versus 6.7% and 5.7% versus 3.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECT remains underutilized among minority racial/ethnic groups. Factors contributing to this pattern include referral, patient preference, and/or other specific situations that need to be addressed to reduce disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管电休克疗法(ECT)已被证实对各种精神疾病有效,但其转诊和使用情况仍不尽如人意。本研究旨在考察一家三级医疗中心的电休克疗法转诊和使用模式,并评估导致电休克疗法使用不足的因素:这项回顾性研究调查了2022-2023年间该机构转诊的ECT患者(N = 76,≥18岁/o),人口统计学数据来自电子病历:76名患者被转诊接受电痉挛疗法治疗,其中35人接受了治疗。接受治疗组的平均年龄略低(45.5 岁对 46.2 岁)。性别分布不同,接受电痉挛疗法的男性较多(54.3%),而拒绝接受治疗的女性较多(70.7%)。两组中白人占大多数,但黑人接受电痉挛疗法的可能性较小(14 人未接受治疗,4 人接受治疗),而西班牙裔接受治疗的可能性较大(2 人未接受治疗,7 人接受治疗)。白种人(61.9%)和黑种人(33.3%)更经常拒绝接受电疗,而交通和后勤问题对不同种族群体都有影响,其中对黑种人的影响最大(42.9%)。重度抑郁障碍是主要诊断,在接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者中分布均匀。与各州的数据相比,黑人和亚裔患者在接受电痉挛疗法治疗的群体中所占比例较高,分别为11.4%对6.7%和5.7%对3.5%:结论:在少数种族/族裔群体中,电痉挛疗法仍未得到充分利用。造成这种模式的因素包括转诊、患者偏好和/或其他特殊情况,需要加以解决以减少差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociodemographic Patterns of Electroconvulsive Therapy Referral and Utilization in a Tertiary Health Care Facility.

Objective: Despite electroconvulsive therapy's (ECT) proven effectiveness in various psychiatric conditions, ECT referral and utilization remains suboptimal. This study sought to examine the pattern of ECT referral and utilization at a tertiary care center and to assess factors contributing to the underutilization of ECT.

Methods: This retrospective study examined patients referred to ECT at this facility from 2022-2023 (N = 76, ≥18 y/o) with demographic data obtained from the electronic medical record.

Results: Seventy-six patients were referred for ECT, with 35 receiving treatments. The treated group had a slightly younger mean age (45.5 vs 46.2 years). Gender distribution varied, with more males receiving ECT (54.3%) and more females declining (70.7%). Whites were the majority in both groups, but Blacks were less likely to receive ECT (14 not treated vs 4 treated), while Hispanics were more likely to be treated (2 not treated vs 7 treated). Declining ECT was more frequent among Whites (61.9%) and Blacks (33.3%), while transportation and logistical issues affected various racial groups with the highest impact on Blacks (42.9%). Major depressive disorder was the primary diagnosis, evenly distributed between treated and nontreated patients. In comparison to state data, Blacks and Asians showed a higher representation among the treatment group with those treated with ECT, 11.4% versus 6.7% and 5.7% versus 3.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: ECT remains underutilized among minority racial/ethnic groups. Factors contributing to this pattern include referral, patient preference, and/or other specific situations that need to be addressed to reduce disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信