Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v12.43074
Arshjot Singh Basra, Shweta Sedani, Lavannya Phaye, Rohan Khetan
{"title":"Addition of silver diamine fluoride to restorative materials: effect on microhardness and microleakage.","authors":"Arshjot Singh Basra, Shweta Sedani, Lavannya Phaye, Rohan Khetan","doi":"10.2340/biid.v12.43074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on microhardness and microleakage of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cavities were prepared in 28 extracted teeth and restored according to four regimens (GIC, composite, GIC and SDF conditioned, composite and SDF conditioned). The restored teeth were <i>thermocycled</i> and autoclaved and then exposed to cariogenic challenge (inoculated with <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> and <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>) for 30 days. The restored teeth were sectioned mesio-distally. One half was subjected to microleakage testing (dye penetration using 2% methylene blue) and the other to Vickers hardness test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 4 SDF + Composite had the highest mean microleakage at 1.59 ± 0.02 (mm), and Group 1 (GIC) and Group 3 (Composite) had the lowest mean microleakage (0.63 ± 0.009 mm and 0.63 ± 0.02 mm, respectively). The highest mean microhardness (HV) was observed in Group 3 (Composite) at 327 ± 2.16 and lowest in Group 2 (GIC + SDF) at 283 ± 1.95. Results were statistically significant with a <i>p</i> value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDF conditioning negatively impacted microhardness and increased microleakage, which could negatively impact the longevity of restorations. Therefore, in this study, SDF was not suitable as a treatment to decrease the occurrence of secondary caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"12 ","pages":"43074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v12.43074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估二胺氟化银(SDF)对复合树脂和玻璃离子体水泥修复体的微硬度和微渗漏的影响:在 28 颗拔牙中制备龋洞,并按照四种方案进行修复(GIC、复合材料、GIC 和 SDF 条件、复合材料和 SDF 条件)。修复后的牙齿经过热循环和高压灭菌处理,然后接受致龋挑战(接种嗜酸乳杆菌和变异链球菌)30 天。修复后的牙齿被从中间向两侧切开。一半进行微渗漏测试(使用 2% 亚甲蓝进行染料渗透),另一半进行维氏硬度测试:结果:第 4 组 SDF + 复合材料的平均微渗漏率最高,为 1.59 ± 0.02(毫米),第 1 组(GIC)和第 3 组(复合材料)的平均微渗漏率最低(分别为 0.63 ± 0.009 毫米和 0.63 ± 0.02 毫米)。第 3 组(复合材料)的平均显微硬度 (HV) 最高,为 327 ± 2.16,第 2 组(GIC + SDF)最低,为 283 ± 1.95。结果具有统计学意义,P 值小于 0.05:结论:SDF 调理会对微硬度产生负面影响,并增加微渗漏,这可能会对修复体的寿命产生负面影响。因此,在这项研究中,SDF 并不适合作为减少继发龋发生的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of silver diamine fluoride to restorative materials: effect on microhardness and microleakage.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on microhardness and microleakage of composite and glass ionomer cement restorations.

Materials and methods: Cavities were prepared in 28 extracted teeth and restored according to four regimens (GIC, composite, GIC and SDF conditioned, composite and SDF conditioned). The restored teeth were thermocycled and autoclaved and then exposed to cariogenic challenge (inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans) for 30 days. The restored teeth were sectioned mesio-distally. One half was subjected to microleakage testing (dye penetration using 2% methylene blue) and the other to Vickers hardness test.

Results: Group 4 SDF + Composite had the highest mean microleakage at 1.59 ± 0.02 (mm), and Group 1 (GIC) and Group 3 (Composite) had the lowest mean microleakage (0.63 ± 0.009 mm and 0.63 ± 0.02 mm, respectively). The highest mean microhardness (HV) was observed in Group 3 (Composite) at 327 ± 2.16 and lowest in Group 2 (GIC + SDF) at 283 ± 1.95. Results were statistically significant with a p value < 0.05.

Conclusion: SDF conditioning negatively impacted microhardness and increased microleakage, which could negatively impact the longevity of restorations. Therefore, in this study, SDF was not suitable as a treatment to decrease the occurrence of secondary caries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信