Marina Pinheiro, Carolina Valente, Margarida Cruz, David Nascimento Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte
{"title":"欧洲移民结核病筛查程序管理指南:系统回顾。","authors":"Marina Pinheiro, Carolina Valente, Margarida Cruz, David Nascimento Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review assesses the current available evidence across the WHO European region on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different approaches used for TB screening and also explores the facilitators and barriers that migrants face during screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an extensive, comprehensive, and systematic literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge, without any restrictions on publication date or language. In addition, we reviewed grey literature and reports. The data were meticulously analysed with a focus on screening of TB active disease and infection effectiveness indicators, and cost-effectiveness economic analyses as a primary objective and the comprehension of barriers and facilitators of screening as a secondary objective.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our review included 43 studies covering over 8 million migrants from 11 countries. The findings demonstrate that while screening uptake was high, coverage varied, and completion rates for preventive treatments were low. Economic analyses supported the high cost-effectiveness of the screening programmes, particularly when integrating both active TB and TBI screening strategies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This review underscores the cost-effectiveness and public health importance of TB screening in migrant populations within Europe. However, the disparities in screening practices highlight the urgent need for standardisation at the European level.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"31 1","pages":"2482855"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European guidelines for the management of tuberculosis screening procedures in migrants: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Pinheiro, Carolina Valente, Margarida Cruz, David Nascimento Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review assesses the current available evidence across the WHO European region on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different approaches used for TB screening and also explores the facilitators and barriers that migrants face during screening programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an extensive, comprehensive, and systematic literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge, without any restrictions on publication date or language. In addition, we reviewed grey literature and reports. The data were meticulously analysed with a focus on screening of TB active disease and infection effectiveness indicators, and cost-effectiveness economic analyses as a primary objective and the comprehension of barriers and facilitators of screening as a secondary objective.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our review included 43 studies covering over 8 million migrants from 11 countries. The findings demonstrate that while screening uptake was high, coverage varied, and completion rates for preventive treatments were low. Economic analyses supported the high cost-effectiveness of the screening programmes, particularly when integrating both active TB and TBI screening strategies.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This review underscores the cost-effectiveness and public health importance of TB screening in migrant populations within Europe. However, the disparities in screening practices highlight the urgent need for standardisation at the European level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"2482855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2025.2482855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本系统综述评估了世卫组织欧洲区域关于用于结核病筛查的不同方法的有效性和成本效益的现有证据,并探讨了移民在筛查规划期间面临的促进因素和障碍。方法:我们在MEDLINE、Cochrane、Scopus和ISI Web of Knowledge等多个数据库中进行了广泛、全面和系统的文献检索,不受出版日期和语言的限制。此外,我们回顾了灰色文献和报告。对数据进行了细致的分析,重点是结核病活动性疾病和感染有效性指标的筛查,并将成本效益经济分析作为主要目标,将了解筛查的障碍和促进因素作为次要目标。研究结果:我们的综述包括43项研究,涵盖了来自11个国家的800多万移民。研究结果表明,虽然筛查率很高,但覆盖率各不相同,预防治疗的完成率很低。经济分析支持筛查规划的高成本效益,特别是在整合活动性结核病和TBI筛查策略时。解释:本综述强调了在欧洲移民人群中进行结核病筛查的成本效益和公共卫生重要性。然而,筛查做法的差异突出了欧洲一级标准化的迫切需要。
European guidelines for the management of tuberculosis screening procedures in migrants: A systematic review.
Background: This systematic review assesses the current available evidence across the WHO European region on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different approaches used for TB screening and also explores the facilitators and barriers that migrants face during screening programmes.
Methods: We conducted an extensive, comprehensive, and systematic literature search across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge, without any restrictions on publication date or language. In addition, we reviewed grey literature and reports. The data were meticulously analysed with a focus on screening of TB active disease and infection effectiveness indicators, and cost-effectiveness economic analyses as a primary objective and the comprehension of barriers and facilitators of screening as a secondary objective.
Findings: Our review included 43 studies covering over 8 million migrants from 11 countries. The findings demonstrate that while screening uptake was high, coverage varied, and completion rates for preventive treatments were low. Economic analyses supported the high cost-effectiveness of the screening programmes, particularly when integrating both active TB and TBI screening strategies.
Interpretation: This review underscores the cost-effectiveness and public health importance of TB screening in migrant populations within Europe. However, the disparities in screening practices highlight the urgent need for standardisation at the European level.
PulmonologyMedicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍:
Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.