加拿大大麻法规的支持度和消费者看法。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Anastasia Marquette, David Hammond
{"title":"加拿大大麻法规的支持度和消费者看法。","authors":"Anastasia Marquette, David Hammond","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2479152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Canada legalized cannabis for adult (recreational) use in 2018, alongside regulations on the sale, use, and possession of cannabis. To date, there is little evidence on consumer perceptions and support of cannabis regulations.<i>Objectives:</i> This study examined perceptions of nine cannabis regulatory policies, including differences by cannabis consumption and provincial policy.<i>Methods:</i> National survey data were analyzed from Wave 5 of the International Cannabis Policy Study conducted online in 2022 with 16,812 Canadians aged 16+ years, 62% of which were assigned female-at-birth. Weighted logistic regression models examined support for nine policy variables.<i>Results:</i> Support among Canadians was greatest for health warnings on cannabis products (62.6%), legalization for adult use (58.5%), and retail store window-coverings (49.2%), followed by a vaping/extract THC limit (40.1%), retail store density (35.5%), government-only store models (34.6%), the THC limit on edibles (32.3%), and advertising restrictions (31.8%). The 30 g purchasing limit had the least consumer support (10.1%). As consumption increased, opposition generally increased, although support remained high among consumers. Compared to non-consumers, daily consumers were more likely to oppose window-coverings (OR = 1.43, CI95 = 1.16-1.75, <i>p</i> = .001). Where policies differed provincially, few differences in support were observed. No differences in support for THC limits on vaping/extracts were observed between Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Quebec versus the rest of Canada, despite stronger vaping/extract regulations (OR = 1.05, CI95 = 0.87-1.28, <i>p</i> = .597).<i>Conclusion:</i> Canadians generally support existing cannabis regulations that were implemented to support public health. The high level of support among consumers suggests that the comprehensive regulations may not undermine transitions to legal retail sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels of support and consumer perceptions of cannabis regulations in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Marquette, David Hammond\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00952990.2025.2479152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Canada legalized cannabis for adult (recreational) use in 2018, alongside regulations on the sale, use, and possession of cannabis. To date, there is little evidence on consumer perceptions and support of cannabis regulations.<i>Objectives:</i> This study examined perceptions of nine cannabis regulatory policies, including differences by cannabis consumption and provincial policy.<i>Methods:</i> National survey data were analyzed from Wave 5 of the International Cannabis Policy Study conducted online in 2022 with 16,812 Canadians aged 16+ years, 62% of which were assigned female-at-birth. Weighted logistic regression models examined support for nine policy variables.<i>Results:</i> Support among Canadians was greatest for health warnings on cannabis products (62.6%), legalization for adult use (58.5%), and retail store window-coverings (49.2%), followed by a vaping/extract THC limit (40.1%), retail store density (35.5%), government-only store models (34.6%), the THC limit on edibles (32.3%), and advertising restrictions (31.8%). The 30 g purchasing limit had the least consumer support (10.1%). As consumption increased, opposition generally increased, although support remained high among consumers. Compared to non-consumers, daily consumers were more likely to oppose window-coverings (OR = 1.43, CI95 = 1.16-1.75, <i>p</i> = .001). Where policies differed provincially, few differences in support were observed. No differences in support for THC limits on vaping/extracts were observed between Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Quebec versus the rest of Canada, despite stronger vaping/extract regulations (OR = 1.05, CI95 = 0.87-1.28, <i>p</i> = .597).<i>Conclusion:</i> Canadians generally support existing cannabis regulations that were implemented to support public health. The high level of support among consumers suggests that the comprehensive regulations may not undermine transitions to legal retail sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2479152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2479152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levels of support and consumer perceptions of cannabis regulations in Canada.

Background: Canada legalized cannabis for adult (recreational) use in 2018, alongside regulations on the sale, use, and possession of cannabis. To date, there is little evidence on consumer perceptions and support of cannabis regulations.Objectives: This study examined perceptions of nine cannabis regulatory policies, including differences by cannabis consumption and provincial policy.Methods: National survey data were analyzed from Wave 5 of the International Cannabis Policy Study conducted online in 2022 with 16,812 Canadians aged 16+ years, 62% of which were assigned female-at-birth. Weighted logistic regression models examined support for nine policy variables.Results: Support among Canadians was greatest for health warnings on cannabis products (62.6%), legalization for adult use (58.5%), and retail store window-coverings (49.2%), followed by a vaping/extract THC limit (40.1%), retail store density (35.5%), government-only store models (34.6%), the THC limit on edibles (32.3%), and advertising restrictions (31.8%). The 30 g purchasing limit had the least consumer support (10.1%). As consumption increased, opposition generally increased, although support remained high among consumers. Compared to non-consumers, daily consumers were more likely to oppose window-coverings (OR = 1.43, CI95 = 1.16-1.75, p = .001). Where policies differed provincially, few differences in support were observed. No differences in support for THC limits on vaping/extracts were observed between Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Quebec versus the rest of Canada, despite stronger vaping/extract regulations (OR = 1.05, CI95 = 0.87-1.28, p = .597).Conclusion: Canadians generally support existing cannabis regulations that were implemented to support public health. The high level of support among consumers suggests that the comprehensive regulations may not undermine transitions to legal retail sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信