利益相关者在非正式指导中的作用:对在急症护理机构工作的护士和助产士的定性描述性研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tracy Alexis Kakyo, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Diane Chamberlain
{"title":"利益相关者在非正式指导中的作用:对在急症护理机构工作的护士和助产士的定性描述性研究。","authors":"Tracy Alexis Kakyo, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Diane Chamberlain","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03020-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the role of stakeholders (mentee, mentor, and the organisation) in informal mentoring of nurses and midwives working in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study guided by reflexive thematic analysis. This manuscript was written in adherence to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 35 nurses and/or midwives working in three regional hospitals in Uganda were conducted between June and September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five overarching themes were identified reflecting nurses' and midwives' perceptions on building blocks of successful mentoring; approaches to mentor/mentee selection; varied strategies for mentoring in hospital environments; responsibilities of the stakeholders; and mentoring being a win-win for all stakeholders. Collectively, these themes highlight the input, processes, and short-term outcomes of engaging nurses and midwives in mentoring within acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that informal mentoring offers advantages comparable to those of formal mentoring programs. These findings also challenge the prevailing notion of unidirectional mentoring. Mentees, just like mentors, play a proactive role in the informal mentoring process. Furthermore, the organisation is not simply a contextual variable; it actively contributes to the dynamics of informal mentoring relationships. The study also highlights the potential for inter-unit and inter-facility mentoring.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"357"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The stakeholders' role in informal mentoring: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses and midwives working in acute care settings.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Alexis Kakyo, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Diane Chamberlain\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03020-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the role of stakeholders (mentee, mentor, and the organisation) in informal mentoring of nurses and midwives working in acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study guided by reflexive thematic analysis. This manuscript was written in adherence to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 35 nurses and/or midwives working in three regional hospitals in Uganda were conducted between June and September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five overarching themes were identified reflecting nurses' and midwives' perceptions on building blocks of successful mentoring; approaches to mentor/mentee selection; varied strategies for mentoring in hospital environments; responsibilities of the stakeholders; and mentoring being a win-win for all stakeholders. Collectively, these themes highlight the input, processes, and short-term outcomes of engaging nurses and midwives in mentoring within acute care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that informal mentoring offers advantages comparable to those of formal mentoring programs. These findings also challenge the prevailing notion of unidirectional mentoring. Mentees, just like mentors, play a proactive role in the informal mentoring process. Furthermore, the organisation is not simply a contextual variable; it actively contributes to the dynamics of informal mentoring relationships. The study also highlights the potential for inter-unit and inter-facility mentoring.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03020-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03020-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解利益相关者(学员,导师和组织)在非正式指导护士和助产士工作在急症护理环境中的作用。设计:以反身性主题分析为指导的定性描述性研究。本文是按照《定性研究报告标准》编写的。方法:在2022年6月至9月期间,对乌干达三家地区医院的35名护士和/或助产士进行了半结构化访谈。结果:确定了五个总体主题,反映了护士和助产士对成功指导的基石的看法;选择导师/学员的方法;在医院环境中指导的各种策略;利益相关者的责任;指导对所有利益相关者来说都是双赢的。总的来说,这些主题强调了在急性护理环境中让护士和助产士参与指导的投入、过程和短期结果。结论:我们的研究结果表明,非正式指导具有与正式指导计划相当的优势。这些发现也挑战了单向指导的流行观念。被徒弟,就像导师一样,在非正式的指导过程中扮演着积极主动的角色。此外,组织不仅仅是一个背景变量;它积极地促进了非正式指导关系的动态发展。该研究还强调了单位间和设施间指导的潜力。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The stakeholders' role in informal mentoring: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses and midwives working in acute care settings.

Aim: To understand the role of stakeholders (mentee, mentor, and the organisation) in informal mentoring of nurses and midwives working in acute care settings.

Design: A qualitative descriptive study guided by reflexive thematic analysis. This manuscript was written in adherence to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 35 nurses and/or midwives working in three regional hospitals in Uganda were conducted between June and September 2022.

Results: Five overarching themes were identified reflecting nurses' and midwives' perceptions on building blocks of successful mentoring; approaches to mentor/mentee selection; varied strategies for mentoring in hospital environments; responsibilities of the stakeholders; and mentoring being a win-win for all stakeholders. Collectively, these themes highlight the input, processes, and short-term outcomes of engaging nurses and midwives in mentoring within acute care settings.

Conclusion: Our findings reveal that informal mentoring offers advantages comparable to those of formal mentoring programs. These findings also challenge the prevailing notion of unidirectional mentoring. Mentees, just like mentors, play a proactive role in the informal mentoring process. Furthermore, the organisation is not simply a contextual variable; it actively contributes to the dynamics of informal mentoring relationships. The study also highlights the potential for inter-unit and inter-facility mentoring.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信