评估护士对辅助护士机器人在产科和新生儿护理中的设计和使用的看法:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Özen İnam, Samet Okay
{"title":"评估护士对辅助护士机器人在产科和新生儿护理中的设计和使用的看法:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Özen İnam, Samet Okay","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03025-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate nurses' perspectives on the design of nurse assistant robots that can be utilized in obstetrics and neonatal units. The research examines the potential of these robots in enhancing the quality of patient care, reducing workload, and standardizing care processes from the nurses' perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 52 nurses working in obstetrics and neonatal units of hospitals. Conjoint analysis was used to evaluate preferences for the features of nurse assistant robots while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured questions. The Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale was used to measure nurses' concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis results indicate that nurses prioritize features such as sterilization, data transfer, alarm systems, precision, and autonomous navigation in nurse assistant robots. Qualitative analysis findings reveal positive perceptions regarding the robots' potential to reduce error rates, enhance patient safety, and alleviate workload. However, concerns about technological dependency, sterilization issues, and potential job displacement were also expressed. Furthermore, technological/systematic issues and lack of communication/empathy were identified as disadvantages of nurse assistant robots. Considering the sensitive nature of obstetrics and neonatal units, it was suggested that these robots should primarily focus on vital sign monitoring and material preparation tasks. The findings from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale indicate that participants exhibit moderate-to-high levels of general anxiety (87.6). Specifically, the Socio-Technical Blindness and Job Transition subscales scored higher compared to other dimensions (r = -0.35, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize that features such as sterilization, data transfer, safety sensors, and user-friendly guidance systems should be prioritized in the design of nurse assistant robots. Moreover, experience and training were found to positively influence technological adaptation. The results provide valuable insights into the design and integration of nurse assistant robots into healthcare services. This study offers both theoretical and practical guidance for the development of nurse assistant robots.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of nurses' perspectives on the design and use of assistant nurse robots in obstetrics and neonatal care: a mixed-method study.\",\"authors\":\"Özen İnam, Samet Okay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-03025-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate nurses' perspectives on the design of nurse assistant robots that can be utilized in obstetrics and neonatal units. The research examines the potential of these robots in enhancing the quality of patient care, reducing workload, and standardizing care processes from the nurses' perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 52 nurses working in obstetrics and neonatal units of hospitals. Conjoint analysis was used to evaluate preferences for the features of nurse assistant robots while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured questions. The Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale was used to measure nurses' concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis results indicate that nurses prioritize features such as sterilization, data transfer, alarm systems, precision, and autonomous navigation in nurse assistant robots. Qualitative analysis findings reveal positive perceptions regarding the robots' potential to reduce error rates, enhance patient safety, and alleviate workload. However, concerns about technological dependency, sterilization issues, and potential job displacement were also expressed. Furthermore, technological/systematic issues and lack of communication/empathy were identified as disadvantages of nurse assistant robots. Considering the sensitive nature of obstetrics and neonatal units, it was suggested that these robots should primarily focus on vital sign monitoring and material preparation tasks. The findings from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale indicate that participants exhibit moderate-to-high levels of general anxiety (87.6). Specifically, the Socio-Technical Blindness and Job Transition subscales scored higher compared to other dimensions (r = -0.35, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize that features such as sterilization, data transfer, safety sensors, and user-friendly guidance systems should be prioritized in the design of nurse assistant robots. Moreover, experience and training were found to positively influence technological adaptation. The results provide valuable insights into the design and integration of nurse assistant robots into healthcare services. This study offers both theoretical and practical guidance for the development of nurse assistant robots.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03025-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03025-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估护士对设计可用于产科和新生儿病房的护士助理机器人的看法。该研究从护士的角度考察了这些机器人在提高患者护理质量、减少工作量和标准化护理过程方面的潜力。方法:对52名妇产科护士进行问卷调查。采用联合分析的方法评估护理助理机器人的特征偏好,并通过半结构化问题获得定性数据。采用人工智能焦虑量表测量护士的担忧。结果:定量分析结果表明,护士优先考虑护理助理机器人的消毒、数据传输、报警系统、精度和自主导航等功能。定性分析结果显示,人们对机器人在降低错误率、提高患者安全性和减轻工作量方面的潜力持积极看法。但是,对技术依赖、灭菌问题和潜在的工作流离失所问题也表示关切。此外,技术/系统问题和缺乏沟通/同理心被认为是护士助理机器人的缺点。考虑到产科和新生儿病房的敏感性,建议这些机器人主要集中在生命体征监测和材料准备任务上。人工智能焦虑量表的研究结果表明,参与者表现出中度至高度的一般焦虑(87.6)。具体而言,社会技术盲目性和工作转换子量表得分高于其他维度(r = -0.35, p)。结论:研究结果强调,在设计护士助理机器人时,应优先考虑消毒、数据传输、安全传感器和用户友好的引导系统等功能。此外,研究发现经验和培训对技术适应有积极影响。研究结果为护士助理机器人在医疗服务中的设计和集成提供了有价值的见解。本研究为护理助理机器人的发展提供了理论和实践指导。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of nurses' perspectives on the design and use of assistant nurse robots in obstetrics and neonatal care: a mixed-method study.

Background: This study aims to evaluate nurses' perspectives on the design of nurse assistant robots that can be utilized in obstetrics and neonatal units. The research examines the potential of these robots in enhancing the quality of patient care, reducing workload, and standardizing care processes from the nurses' perspective.

Methods: The study was conducted with 52 nurses working in obstetrics and neonatal units of hospitals. Conjoint analysis was used to evaluate preferences for the features of nurse assistant robots while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured questions. The Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale was used to measure nurses' concerns.

Results: Quantitative analysis results indicate that nurses prioritize features such as sterilization, data transfer, alarm systems, precision, and autonomous navigation in nurse assistant robots. Qualitative analysis findings reveal positive perceptions regarding the robots' potential to reduce error rates, enhance patient safety, and alleviate workload. However, concerns about technological dependency, sterilization issues, and potential job displacement were also expressed. Furthermore, technological/systematic issues and lack of communication/empathy were identified as disadvantages of nurse assistant robots. Considering the sensitive nature of obstetrics and neonatal units, it was suggested that these robots should primarily focus on vital sign monitoring and material preparation tasks. The findings from the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale indicate that participants exhibit moderate-to-high levels of general anxiety (87.6). Specifically, the Socio-Technical Blindness and Job Transition subscales scored higher compared to other dimensions (r = -0.35, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The findings emphasize that features such as sterilization, data transfer, safety sensors, and user-friendly guidance systems should be prioritized in the design of nurse assistant robots. Moreover, experience and training were found to positively influence technological adaptation. The results provide valuable insights into the design and integration of nurse assistant robots into healthcare services. This study offers both theoretical and practical guidance for the development of nurse assistant robots.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信