恐惧因素:教师对助理医师教育中人工智能的看法。

Q2 Health Professions
Lisa M Alexander, Jonathan Bowser, Kara Caruthers, Linda Sekhon, Michel Statler, Howard Straker, Denise Rizzolo, Hannah De La Rosa, Donald T Simeon
{"title":"恐惧因素:教师对助理医师教育中人工智能的看法。","authors":"Lisa M Alexander, Jonathan Bowser, Kara Caruthers, Linda Sekhon, Michel Statler, Howard Straker, Denise Rizzolo, Hannah De La Rosa, Donald T Simeon","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This paper focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in physician assistant/associate (PA) education based upon results from a national survey of PA faculty conducted by the PA Education Association in early 2024. This is the first survey of its kind to assess PA faculty perspectives on the topic. It adds to the growing body of knowledge related to AI across all contemporary business, social, and educational activities. A survey containing Likert ranking questions and open-ended comments was sent to all faculty listed in the PA Education Association database (n = 4338). A response rate of 14.8% was established after removing incomplete survey responses from the data set. The knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among faculty were analyzed, along with open-ended comments that explored concerns and current utilization of digital technology among participating respondents. While knowledge of AI technology was measured as average to good by 60.9% of faculty, confidence in using it was low. Group differences in self-reported knowledge of AI was only significant by participants' primary role in in their institution (χ2(10) = 53.6, P ≤ 0.001). Participation in formal or informal continuing education programs focused on AI appears to increase confidence levels among participants, although only 35% of respondents indicated participating in these activities. Most respondents (64.9%) expressed a positive view of AI technology in PA education, but did express concerns, particularly on student's development of critical thinking skills and academic integrity. The paper concludes by recommending training and support for faculty to harness AI's potential and enhance PA education, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces the critical human elements in teaching and learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear Factor: Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Associate Education.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M Alexander, Jonathan Bowser, Kara Caruthers, Linda Sekhon, Michel Statler, Howard Straker, Denise Rizzolo, Hannah De La Rosa, Donald T Simeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This paper focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in physician assistant/associate (PA) education based upon results from a national survey of PA faculty conducted by the PA Education Association in early 2024. This is the first survey of its kind to assess PA faculty perspectives on the topic. It adds to the growing body of knowledge related to AI across all contemporary business, social, and educational activities. A survey containing Likert ranking questions and open-ended comments was sent to all faculty listed in the PA Education Association database (n = 4338). A response rate of 14.8% was established after removing incomplete survey responses from the data set. The knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among faculty were analyzed, along with open-ended comments that explored concerns and current utilization of digital technology among participating respondents. While knowledge of AI technology was measured as average to good by 60.9% of faculty, confidence in using it was low. Group differences in self-reported knowledge of AI was only significant by participants' primary role in in their institution (χ2(10) = 53.6, P ≤ 0.001). Participation in formal or informal continuing education programs focused on AI appears to increase confidence levels among participants, although only 35% of respondents indicated participating in these activities. Most respondents (64.9%) expressed a positive view of AI technology in PA education, but did express concerns, particularly on student's development of critical thinking skills and academic integrity. The paper concludes by recommending training and support for faculty to harness AI's potential and enhance PA education, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces the critical human elements in teaching and learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physician Assistant Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文基于美国医师助理教育协会(PA education Association)在2024年初对医师助理/助理(PA)教师进行的一项全国调查的结果,重点研究了人工智能(AI)对医师助理/助理(PA)教育的影响。这是同类调查中首次评估私人学院教师对该主题的看法。它为所有当代商业、社会和教育活动中与人工智能相关的不断增长的知识体系增添了新的内容。一份包含李克特排名问题和开放式评论的调查被发送到PA教育协会数据库中列出的所有教师(n = 4338)。从数据集中剔除不完整的调查回复后,回复率为14.8%。对教师的知识、态度和信心进行了分析,并提出了开放式评论,探讨了参与调查的受访者对数字技术的关注和当前使用情况。尽管60.9%的教师对人工智能技术的了解程度为一般到良好,但他们对使用人工智能技术的信心很低。自我报告的人工智能知识的组间差异仅因参与者在其机构中的主要角色而显著(χ2(10) = 53.6, P≤0.001)。参加以人工智能为重点的正式或非正式的继续教育项目似乎增加了参与者的信心水平,尽管只有35%的受访者表示参加了这些活动。大多数受访者(64.9%)对人工智能技术在PA教育中的应用持积极态度,但也表达了担忧,尤其是对学生批判性思维技能和学术诚信的培养。论文最后建议对教师进行培训和支持,以利用人工智能的潜力并加强个人助理教育,确保人工智能补充而不是取代教学和学习中的关键人类因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fear Factor: Faculty Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Physician Associate Education.

Abstract: This paper focuses on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in physician assistant/associate (PA) education based upon results from a national survey of PA faculty conducted by the PA Education Association in early 2024. This is the first survey of its kind to assess PA faculty perspectives on the topic. It adds to the growing body of knowledge related to AI across all contemporary business, social, and educational activities. A survey containing Likert ranking questions and open-ended comments was sent to all faculty listed in the PA Education Association database (n = 4338). A response rate of 14.8% was established after removing incomplete survey responses from the data set. The knowledge, attitudes, and confidence among faculty were analyzed, along with open-ended comments that explored concerns and current utilization of digital technology among participating respondents. While knowledge of AI technology was measured as average to good by 60.9% of faculty, confidence in using it was low. Group differences in self-reported knowledge of AI was only significant by participants' primary role in in their institution (χ2(10) = 53.6, P ≤ 0.001). Participation in formal or informal continuing education programs focused on AI appears to increase confidence levels among participants, although only 35% of respondents indicated participating in these activities. Most respondents (64.9%) expressed a positive view of AI technology in PA education, but did express concerns, particularly on student's development of critical thinking skills and academic integrity. The paper concludes by recommending training and support for faculty to harness AI's potential and enhance PA education, ensuring that AI complements rather than replaces the critical human elements in teaching and learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信