T S Vu, N N Tran, T T H Le, T K Ngo, T T H Nguyen, T A V Nguyen, T T D Nguyen, P L Nguyen, T N Nguyen, T L Kim, T M Dang
{"title":"越南双相情感障碍患者治疗依从性的相关因素","authors":"T S Vu, N N Tran, T T H Le, T K Ngo, T T H Nguyen, T A V Nguyen, T T D Nguyen, P L Nguyen, T N Nguyen, T L Kim, T M Dang","doi":"10.12809/eaap2507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors associated with treatment non-adherence among patients with bipolar disorder in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outpatients with bipolar disorder receiving treatment at the Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam between November 2023 and August 2024 were recruited using convenience sampling. Medication adherence was measured using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The adherence and non-adherence groups were compared. Generalised multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the effects of relevant factors on the MMAS-8 score. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 121 patients with bipolar disorder included in the analysis, 53 (43.8%) were classified as treatment adherence and 68 (56.2%) as non-adherence. In the multivariable analysis, non-adherence status was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 5.837, p = 0.006), lower education level (OR = 3.587, p = 0.023), and receipt of >2 medications (OR = 6.832, p = 0.002), and negatively associated with married status (OR = 0.149, p = 0.002) and family encouragement (OR = 0.214, p = 0.024). In the non-adherence group, MMAS-8 scores were negatively correlated with male sex (β = -0.565, p = 0.001), distance to the clinic (β = -0.002, p = 0.038), and number of medications (β = -1.927, p = 0.030), and positively correlated with family companion during examinations (β = 0.598, p = 0.016), family reminders to take medication (β = 0.585, p = 0.019), and family management of medication (β = 0.636, p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with bipolar disorder, treatment non-adherence is associated with male sex and number of prescribed medications. Family support is important for treatment adherence; efforts to foster family involvement may improve treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":"35 1","pages":"32-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with treatment non-adherence among patients with bipolar disorder in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"T S Vu, N N Tran, T T H Le, T K Ngo, T T H Nguyen, T A V Nguyen, T T D Nguyen, P L Nguyen, T N Nguyen, T L Kim, T M Dang\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/eaap2507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors associated with treatment non-adherence among patients with bipolar disorder in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outpatients with bipolar disorder receiving treatment at the Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam between November 2023 and August 2024 were recruited using convenience sampling. Medication adherence was measured using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The adherence and non-adherence groups were compared. Generalised multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the effects of relevant factors on the MMAS-8 score. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 121 patients with bipolar disorder included in the analysis, 53 (43.8%) were classified as treatment adherence and 68 (56.2%) as non-adherence. In the multivariable analysis, non-adherence status was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 5.837, p = 0.006), lower education level (OR = 3.587, p = 0.023), and receipt of >2 medications (OR = 6.832, p = 0.002), and negatively associated with married status (OR = 0.149, p = 0.002) and family encouragement (OR = 0.214, p = 0.024). In the non-adherence group, MMAS-8 scores were negatively correlated with male sex (β = -0.565, p = 0.001), distance to the clinic (β = -0.002, p = 0.038), and number of medications (β = -1.927, p = 0.030), and positively correlated with family companion during examinations (β = 0.598, p = 0.016), family reminders to take medication (β = 0.585, p = 0.019), and family management of medication (β = 0.636, p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with bipolar disorder, treatment non-adherence is associated with male sex and number of prescribed medications. Family support is important for treatment adherence; efforts to foster family involvement may improve treatment adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"32-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定越南双相情感障碍患者治疗不依从性的相关因素。方法:采用方便抽样方法,收集2023年11月至2024年8月在越南巴赫迈医院接受治疗的双相情感障碍门诊患者。药物依从性采用莫里斯基药物依从性量表(MMAS-8)进行测量。比较依从组和非依从组。采用广义多元线性回归评估相关因素对MMAS-8评分的影响。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与不依从相关的因素。结果:纳入分析的121例双相情感障碍患者中,53例(43.8%)被分类为治疗依从性,68例(56.2%)被分类为非依从性。在多变量分析中,不依从状态与男性(比值比[OR] = 5.837, p = 0.006)、教育程度较低(OR = 3.587, p = 0.023)、接受bbb2.0药物(OR = 6.832, p = 0.002)呈正相关,与婚姻状况(OR = 0.149, p = 0.002)和家庭鼓励(OR = 0.214, p = 0.024)呈负相关。非依从性组MMAS-8评分与男性性别(β = -0.565, p = 0.001)、就诊距离(β = -0.002, p = 0.038)、用药次数(β = -1.927, p = 0.030)呈负相关,与检查时家属陪伴(β = 0.598, p = 0.016)、家属提醒服药(β = 0.585, p = 0.019)、家庭用药管理(β = 0.636, p = 0.036)呈正相关。结论:在双相情感障碍患者中,治疗依从性与男性和处方药物数量有关。家庭支持对治疗依从性很重要;努力促进家庭参与可能会提高治疗依从性。
Factors associated with treatment non-adherence among patients with bipolar disorder in Vietnam.
Objectives: To identify factors associated with treatment non-adherence among patients with bipolar disorder in Vietnam.
Methods: Outpatients with bipolar disorder receiving treatment at the Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam between November 2023 and August 2024 were recruited using convenience sampling. Medication adherence was measured using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The adherence and non-adherence groups were compared. Generalised multiple linear regression was conducted to assess the effects of relevant factors on the MMAS-8 score. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with non-adherence.
Results: Of 121 patients with bipolar disorder included in the analysis, 53 (43.8%) were classified as treatment adherence and 68 (56.2%) as non-adherence. In the multivariable analysis, non-adherence status was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 5.837, p = 0.006), lower education level (OR = 3.587, p = 0.023), and receipt of >2 medications (OR = 6.832, p = 0.002), and negatively associated with married status (OR = 0.149, p = 0.002) and family encouragement (OR = 0.214, p = 0.024). In the non-adherence group, MMAS-8 scores were negatively correlated with male sex (β = -0.565, p = 0.001), distance to the clinic (β = -0.002, p = 0.038), and number of medications (β = -1.927, p = 0.030), and positively correlated with family companion during examinations (β = 0.598, p = 0.016), family reminders to take medication (β = 0.585, p = 0.019), and family management of medication (β = 0.636, p = 0.036).
Conclusion: Among patients with bipolar disorder, treatment non-adherence is associated with male sex and number of prescribed medications. Family support is important for treatment adherence; efforts to foster family involvement may improve treatment adherence.