{"title":"1900年至2019年美国大麻与大规模枪击事件的关系。","authors":"R R Girgis, H Hesson, P S Appelbaum, G Brucato","doi":"10.12809/eaap2464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mass murder is associated with a lifetime history of substance use. We aimed to examine cannabis involvement among those who committed mass shootings in the United States from 1900 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified mass shooting events in the United States from 1900 to 2019 using publicly available English-language media reports and court/police records. People who perpetrated mass murders using methods other than firearms (eg, knives, automobiles) were used as a comparison group. Events were dichotomised into either prior to 1996 or from 1996 onward (first legalisation for medical use by California). Post-1960 data were used for additional analyses of a more modern era.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of those who committed mass shootings who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis was significantly higher for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (11.2% vs 4.9%, p = 0.002). The proportion of those committed mass murders by other methods who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis did not significantly differ for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (4.8% vs 5.7%, p = 0.76). When 58 mass shooting events and 31 mass murder events by other methods perpetrated before 1960 were excluded, results were similar when 1996 was used as a cutoff for the respective events (p = 0.02 and p = 0.40). Among those who committed mass shootings, those with cannabis involvement (n = 74) were younger than those without (n = 754) [28.7 vs 33.5 years, p < 0.001] and were of younger age group than older age group (11.9% vs 5.8%, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cannabis use may be harmful in subgroups of individuals (eg, those who committed mass shootings) who are vulnerable to cannabis use. This should be considered by policymakers, individuals with commercial interests, the public, and mental health and medical professionals when they debate related public health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":"35 1","pages":"28-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis involvement and mass shooting events in the United States from 1900 to 2019.\",\"authors\":\"R R Girgis, H Hesson, P S Appelbaum, G Brucato\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/eaap2464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mass murder is associated with a lifetime history of substance use. We aimed to examine cannabis involvement among those who committed mass shootings in the United States from 1900 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified mass shooting events in the United States from 1900 to 2019 using publicly available English-language media reports and court/police records. People who perpetrated mass murders using methods other than firearms (eg, knives, automobiles) were used as a comparison group. Events were dichotomised into either prior to 1996 or from 1996 onward (first legalisation for medical use by California). Post-1960 data were used for additional analyses of a more modern era.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of those who committed mass shootings who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis was significantly higher for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (11.2% vs 4.9%, p = 0.002). The proportion of those committed mass murders by other methods who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis did not significantly differ for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (4.8% vs 5.7%, p = 0.76). When 58 mass shooting events and 31 mass murder events by other methods perpetrated before 1960 were excluded, results were similar when 1996 was used as a cutoff for the respective events (p = 0.02 and p = 0.40). Among those who committed mass shootings, those with cannabis involvement (n = 74) were younger than those without (n = 754) [28.7 vs 33.5 years, p < 0.001] and were of younger age group than older age group (11.9% vs 5.8%, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cannabis use may be harmful in subgroups of individuals (eg, those who committed mass shootings) who are vulnerable to cannabis use. This should be considered by policymakers, individuals with commercial interests, the public, and mental health and medical professionals when they debate related public health issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"28-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:大规模谋杀与终生药物使用史有关。我们的目的是研究1900年至2019年美国大规模枪击事件的肇事者与大麻的关系。方法:我们利用公开的英语媒体报道和法院/警察记录,确定了1900年至2019年美国发生的大规模枪击事件。使用非火器(如刀具、汽车)实施大规模谋杀的人被用作对照组。事件分为1996年以前和1996年以后(加州首次将医疗用途合法化)。1960年后的数据被用于对一个更现代的时代进行额外的分析。结果:与1996年之前相比,1996年以后发生的大规模枪击事件中使用、拥有和/或分发大麻的比例明显更高(11.2% vs 4.9%, p = 0.002)。与1996年之前相比,1996年以后使用、拥有和/或分发大麻的大规模谋杀的比例没有显著差异(4.8%对5.7%,p = 0.76)。当排除1960年之前发生的58起大规模枪击事件和31起其他方法的大规模谋杀事件时,将1996年作为各自事件的截止日期时,结果相似(p = 0.02和p = 0.40)。在实施大规模枪击事件的人中,与大麻有关的人(n = 74)比没有大麻的人(n = 754)年轻[28.7岁对33.5岁,p < 0.001],年龄较年轻的人比年龄较大的人(11.9%对5.8%,p = 0.002)。结论:大麻使用可能对易受大麻使用影响的个人亚群体有害(例如,那些实施大规模枪击事件的人)。决策者、有商业利益的个人、公众以及精神卫生和医疗专业人员在讨论相关的公共卫生问题时应考虑到这一点。
Cannabis involvement and mass shooting events in the United States from 1900 to 2019.
Objectives: Mass murder is associated with a lifetime history of substance use. We aimed to examine cannabis involvement among those who committed mass shootings in the United States from 1900 to 2019.
Methods: We identified mass shooting events in the United States from 1900 to 2019 using publicly available English-language media reports and court/police records. People who perpetrated mass murders using methods other than firearms (eg, knives, automobiles) were used as a comparison group. Events were dichotomised into either prior to 1996 or from 1996 onward (first legalisation for medical use by California). Post-1960 data were used for additional analyses of a more modern era.
Results: The proportion of those who committed mass shootings who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis was significantly higher for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (11.2% vs 4.9%, p = 0.002). The proportion of those committed mass murders by other methods who had used, possessed, and/or distributed cannabis did not significantly differ for events that occurred from 1996 onward, compared with prior to 1996 (4.8% vs 5.7%, p = 0.76). When 58 mass shooting events and 31 mass murder events by other methods perpetrated before 1960 were excluded, results were similar when 1996 was used as a cutoff for the respective events (p = 0.02 and p = 0.40). Among those who committed mass shootings, those with cannabis involvement (n = 74) were younger than those without (n = 754) [28.7 vs 33.5 years, p < 0.001] and were of younger age group than older age group (11.9% vs 5.8%, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Cannabis use may be harmful in subgroups of individuals (eg, those who committed mass shootings) who are vulnerable to cannabis use. This should be considered by policymakers, individuals with commercial interests, the public, and mental health and medical professionals when they debate related public health issues.