大鼠记忆策略的神经解剖学相关性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Synapse Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1002/syn.70015
Aysu Balcı, Buse Pınar Cankurtaran, Aybüke Akyel, Kutluk Bilge Arıkan, Bengi Ünal, Çağrı Temuçin Ünal
{"title":"大鼠记忆策略的神经解剖学相关性。","authors":"Aysu Balcı, Buse Pınar Cankurtaran, Aybüke Akyel, Kutluk Bilge Arıkan, Bengi Ünal, Çağrı Temuçin Ünal","doi":"10.1002/syn.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Navigation incorporates a continuum of strategies, where the allocentric strategy relies on relationships between environmental landmarks resulting in a cognitive map, and the egocentric strategy revolves around the body position and stimulus response chains with the body as a reference. Although multiple brain regions contribute to navigation, the hippocampus dominates allocentric navigation, whereas the striatum is key for egocentric navigation. Neuromodulators, such as dopamine and acetylcholine, regulate both the hippocampus and striatum to influence behavior, yet their influence on navigational strategy has not been determined. Interindividual differences in strategy preference are known to exist. Building on these pre-existing interindividual differences, this study explored the neuroanatomical underpinnings on navigational strategy variations in rats through a dual-solution T-maze and immunocytochemistry. Surprisingly, interindividual variations eluded explanation through the density of cholinergic neurons supplying acetylcholine to the hippocampus and striatum. Similarly, the soma morphologies of these neurons exhibited no discernible differences. Dopaminergic cell densities in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), projecting to the hippocampus, and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), projecting to the striatum, failed to account for individual variations as well. Nevertheless, allocentric rats displayed higher VTA/SNpc dopamine neuron fusiformity indexes, potentially contributing to computational distinctions underlying interindividual variations in navigation strategies. This study delves into potential explanations and charts promising avenues for future research. A graphical abstract summarizing the main findings of this study is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":22131,"journal":{"name":"Synapse","volume":"79 3","pages":"e70015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroanatomical Correlates of Memory Strategies in Rats.\",\"authors\":\"Aysu Balcı, Buse Pınar Cankurtaran, Aybüke Akyel, Kutluk Bilge Arıkan, Bengi Ünal, Çağrı Temuçin Ünal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/syn.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Navigation incorporates a continuum of strategies, where the allocentric strategy relies on relationships between environmental landmarks resulting in a cognitive map, and the egocentric strategy revolves around the body position and stimulus response chains with the body as a reference. Although multiple brain regions contribute to navigation, the hippocampus dominates allocentric navigation, whereas the striatum is key for egocentric navigation. Neuromodulators, such as dopamine and acetylcholine, regulate both the hippocampus and striatum to influence behavior, yet their influence on navigational strategy has not been determined. Interindividual differences in strategy preference are known to exist. Building on these pre-existing interindividual differences, this study explored the neuroanatomical underpinnings on navigational strategy variations in rats through a dual-solution T-maze and immunocytochemistry. Surprisingly, interindividual variations eluded explanation through the density of cholinergic neurons supplying acetylcholine to the hippocampus and striatum. Similarly, the soma morphologies of these neurons exhibited no discernible differences. Dopaminergic cell densities in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), projecting to the hippocampus, and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), projecting to the striatum, failed to account for individual variations as well. Nevertheless, allocentric rats displayed higher VTA/SNpc dopamine neuron fusiformity indexes, potentially contributing to computational distinctions underlying interindividual variations in navigation strategies. This study delves into potential explanations and charts promising avenues for future research. A graphical abstract summarizing the main findings of this study is provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synapse\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"e70015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synapse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synapse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导航包含一系列策略,其中非中心策略依赖于环境地标之间的关系,从而形成认知地图,而自我中心策略则以身体为参考,围绕身体位置和刺激反应链展开。虽然多个脑区都参与导航,但海马体主导着非中心导航,而纹状体则是自我中心导航的关键。神经调节剂,如多巴胺和乙酰胆碱,调节海马体和纹状体来影响行为,但它们对导航策略的影响尚未确定。策略偏好的个体间差异是已知的。基于这些已有的个体间差异,本研究通过双溶液t迷宫和免疫细胞化学探索了大鼠导航策略变化的神经解剖学基础。令人惊讶的是,个体间的差异无法通过向海马体和纹状体提供乙酰胆碱的胆碱能神经元的密度来解释。同样,这些神经元的胞体形态也没有明显的差异。多巴胺能细胞密度在腹侧被盖区(VTA),突出到海马体,和黑质致密部(SNpc),突出到纹状体,也不能解释个体差异。然而,异心大鼠显示出更高的VTA/SNpc多巴胺神经元融合指数,这可能有助于在导航策略的个体间差异下的计算差异。这项研究深入探讨了潜在的解释,并为未来的研究指明了有希望的途径。提供了一个图形摘要,总结了本研究的主要发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroanatomical Correlates of Memory Strategies in Rats.

Navigation incorporates a continuum of strategies, where the allocentric strategy relies on relationships between environmental landmarks resulting in a cognitive map, and the egocentric strategy revolves around the body position and stimulus response chains with the body as a reference. Although multiple brain regions contribute to navigation, the hippocampus dominates allocentric navigation, whereas the striatum is key for egocentric navigation. Neuromodulators, such as dopamine and acetylcholine, regulate both the hippocampus and striatum to influence behavior, yet their influence on navigational strategy has not been determined. Interindividual differences in strategy preference are known to exist. Building on these pre-existing interindividual differences, this study explored the neuroanatomical underpinnings on navigational strategy variations in rats through a dual-solution T-maze and immunocytochemistry. Surprisingly, interindividual variations eluded explanation through the density of cholinergic neurons supplying acetylcholine to the hippocampus and striatum. Similarly, the soma morphologies of these neurons exhibited no discernible differences. Dopaminergic cell densities in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), projecting to the hippocampus, and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), projecting to the striatum, failed to account for individual variations as well. Nevertheless, allocentric rats displayed higher VTA/SNpc dopamine neuron fusiformity indexes, potentially contributing to computational distinctions underlying interindividual variations in navigation strategies. This study delves into potential explanations and charts promising avenues for future research. A graphical abstract summarizing the main findings of this study is provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Synapse
Synapse 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SYNAPSE publishes articles concerned with all aspects of synaptic structure and function. This includes neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, neuromodulators, receptors, gap junctions, metabolism, plasticity, circuitry, mathematical modeling, ion channels, patch recording, single unit recording, development, behavior, pathology, toxicology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信