癌症幸存者和医疗保健提供者对体育活动应用的偏好:一项群体概念映射研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Emma Tack, Maya Braun, An De Groef, Lore Dams, Femke De Backere, Marthe Van Overbeke, Geert Crombez, Annick L De Paepe
{"title":"癌症幸存者和医疗保健提供者对体育活动应用的偏好:一项群体概念映射研究。","authors":"Emma Tack, Maya Braun, An De Groef, Lore Dams, Femke De Backere, Marthe Van Overbeke, Geert Crombez, Annick L De Paepe","doi":"10.1002/pon.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help increase physical activity (PA) in diverse groups, including cancer survivors (CSs). Developing an intervention requires a needs assessment of stakeholders, focusing on the preferred features of the application from the perspectives of both CSs and healthcare providers (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group concept mapping was used for this assessment. A first group of stakeholders (CSs: n = 14; HCPs: n = 12) brainstormed and generated statements about preferred app features. A second group (CSs: n = 16; HCPs: n = 23) sorted these statements into thematic clusters and rated their importance. The sorting data was combined, and (dis)similarity matrices were generated through multidimensional scaling. Rating data was aggregated for the overall group and the subgroups (CSs and HCPs) at both the cluster and the statement level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first phase resulted in 133 statements, which were reduced to 77 distinct preferred features. Analysis of the sorting data in phase two resulted in six clusters, which were labeled: (1) \"Information & Social Support,\" (2) \"Encouragement,\" (3) \"Practical Use,\" (4) \"Self-Monitoring & Feedback,\" (5) \"Planning & Goals,\" and (6) \"Personalization.\" Both groups rated \"Planning & Goals\" and \"Personalization\" as most important. CSs considered the \"Encouragement\" cluster as least important, whereas HCPs rated \"Information & Social Support\" the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These insights can guide the development of interventions to promote a physically active lifestyle among CSs. Applications should prioritize goal setting, planning, and personalization to enhance user engagement. Diverse functionalities with user-friendly navigation are essential. Both stakeholder groups showed similar preferences, reflecting a shared vision for intervention development.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 4","pages":"e70144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences of Cancer Survivors and Healthcare Providers for a Physical Activity Application: A Group Concept Mapping Study.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Tack, Maya Braun, An De Groef, Lore Dams, Femke De Backere, Marthe Van Overbeke, Geert Crombez, Annick L De Paepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help increase physical activity (PA) in diverse groups, including cancer survivors (CSs). Developing an intervention requires a needs assessment of stakeholders, focusing on the preferred features of the application from the perspectives of both CSs and healthcare providers (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Group concept mapping was used for this assessment. A first group of stakeholders (CSs: n = 14; HCPs: n = 12) brainstormed and generated statements about preferred app features. A second group (CSs: n = 16; HCPs: n = 23) sorted these statements into thematic clusters and rated their importance. The sorting data was combined, and (dis)similarity matrices were generated through multidimensional scaling. Rating data was aggregated for the overall group and the subgroups (CSs and HCPs) at both the cluster and the statement level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first phase resulted in 133 statements, which were reduced to 77 distinct preferred features. Analysis of the sorting data in phase two resulted in six clusters, which were labeled: (1) \\\"Information & Social Support,\\\" (2) \\\"Encouragement,\\\" (3) \\\"Practical Use,\\\" (4) \\\"Self-Monitoring & Feedback,\\\" (5) \\\"Planning & Goals,\\\" and (6) \\\"Personalization.\\\" Both groups rated \\\"Planning & Goals\\\" and \\\"Personalization\\\" as most important. CSs considered the \\\"Encouragement\\\" cluster as least important, whereas HCPs rated \\\"Information & Social Support\\\" the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These insights can guide the development of interventions to promote a physically active lifestyle among CSs. Applications should prioritize goal setting, planning, and personalization to enhance user engagement. Diverse functionalities with user-friendly navigation are essential. Both stakeholder groups showed similar preferences, reflecting a shared vision for intervention development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"e70144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70144\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:移动健康(mHealth)干预措施可能有助于增加不同群体的身体活动(PA),包括癌症幸存者(CSs)。开发干预措施需要对利益相关者进行需求评估,从CSs和医疗保健提供者(hcp)的角度关注应用程序的首选功能。方法:采用群体概念图法进行评价。第一组利益相关者(CSs: n = 14;hcp: n = 12)进行头脑风暴,并对首选的应用功能做出陈述。第二组(CSs: n = 16;HCPs (n = 23)将这些陈述分类成专题组,并对其重要性进行评级。对排序数据进行组合,通过多维尺度变换生成(非)相似矩阵。在集群和语句级别上汇总整个组和子组(CSs和hcp)的评分数据。结果:第一阶段产生133个语句,减少到77个不同的首选特征。对第二阶段的分类数据进行分析,得到6个聚类,标记为:(1)“信息与社会支持”(2)“鼓励”,(3)“实用”(4)“自我监控与反馈”(5)“计划与目标”和(6)“个性化”。两组人都认为“计划与目标”和“个性化”是最重要的。CSs认为“鼓励”类是最不重要的,而HCPs认为“信息和社会支持”是最不重要的。结论:这些见解可以指导干预措施的发展,以促进CSs中积极的生活方式。应用程序应该优先考虑目标设定、计划和个性化,以增强用户粘性。多样化的功能和用户友好的导航是必不可少的。两个利益相关者群体表现出相似的偏好,反映了对干预措施发展的共同愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences of Cancer Survivors and Healthcare Providers for a Physical Activity Application: A Group Concept Mapping Study.

Background and aims: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help increase physical activity (PA) in diverse groups, including cancer survivors (CSs). Developing an intervention requires a needs assessment of stakeholders, focusing on the preferred features of the application from the perspectives of both CSs and healthcare providers (HCPs).

Methods: Group concept mapping was used for this assessment. A first group of stakeholders (CSs: n = 14; HCPs: n = 12) brainstormed and generated statements about preferred app features. A second group (CSs: n = 16; HCPs: n = 23) sorted these statements into thematic clusters and rated their importance. The sorting data was combined, and (dis)similarity matrices were generated through multidimensional scaling. Rating data was aggregated for the overall group and the subgroups (CSs and HCPs) at both the cluster and the statement level.

Results: The first phase resulted in 133 statements, which were reduced to 77 distinct preferred features. Analysis of the sorting data in phase two resulted in six clusters, which were labeled: (1) "Information & Social Support," (2) "Encouragement," (3) "Practical Use," (4) "Self-Monitoring & Feedback," (5) "Planning & Goals," and (6) "Personalization." Both groups rated "Planning & Goals" and "Personalization" as most important. CSs considered the "Encouragement" cluster as least important, whereas HCPs rated "Information & Social Support" the lowest.

Conclusions: These insights can guide the development of interventions to promote a physically active lifestyle among CSs. Applications should prioritize goal setting, planning, and personalization to enhance user engagement. Diverse functionalities with user-friendly navigation are essential. Both stakeholder groups showed similar preferences, reflecting a shared vision for intervention development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信