澳大利亚和新西兰的植物性饮食和健康结果。

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
James P Goode, Laura E Marchese, Kylie J Smith
{"title":"澳大利亚和新西兰的植物性饮食和健康结果。","authors":"James P Goode, Laura E Marchese, Kylie J Smith","doi":"10.1017/S0029665125001685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is mounting interest in the dual health and environmental benefits of plant-based diets. Such diets prioritise whole foods of plant origin and moderate (though occasionally exclude) animal-sourced foods. However, the evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes in Australasia is limited and diverse, making it unsuitable for systematic review. This review aimed to assess the current state of play, identify research gaps, and suggest good practice recommendations. The consulted evidence base included key studies on plant-based diets and cardiometabolic health or mortality outcomes in Australian and New Zealand adults. Most studies were observational, conducted in Australia, published within the last decade, and relied on a single dietary assessment about 10-30 years ago. Plant-based diets were often examined using categories of vegetarianism, intake of plant or animal protein, or dietary indices. Health outcomes included mortality, type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. While Australia has an emerging and generally favourable evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes, New Zealand's evidence base is still nascent. The lack of similar studies hinders the ability to judge the overall certainty of evidence, which could otherwise inform public health policies and strategies without relying on international studies with unconfirmed applicability. The proportional role of plant- and animal-sourced foods in healthy, sustainable diets in Australasia is an underexplored research area with potentially far-reaching implications, especially concerning nutrient adequacy and the combined health and environmental impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant-based diets and health outcomes in Australia and New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"James P Goode, Laura E Marchese, Kylie J Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0029665125001685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is mounting interest in the dual health and environmental benefits of plant-based diets. Such diets prioritise whole foods of plant origin and moderate (though occasionally exclude) animal-sourced foods. However, the evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes in Australasia is limited and diverse, making it unsuitable for systematic review. This review aimed to assess the current state of play, identify research gaps, and suggest good practice recommendations. The consulted evidence base included key studies on plant-based diets and cardiometabolic health or mortality outcomes in Australian and New Zealand adults. Most studies were observational, conducted in Australia, published within the last decade, and relied on a single dietary assessment about 10-30 years ago. Plant-based diets were often examined using categories of vegetarianism, intake of plant or animal protein, or dietary indices. Health outcomes included mortality, type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. While Australia has an emerging and generally favourable evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes, New Zealand's evidence base is still nascent. The lack of similar studies hinders the ability to judge the overall certainty of evidence, which could otherwise inform public health policies and strategies without relying on international studies with unconfirmed applicability. The proportional role of plant- and animal-sourced foods in healthy, sustainable diets in Australasia is an underexplored research area with potentially far-reaching implications, especially concerning nutrient adequacy and the combined health and environmental impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665125001685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665125001685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对植物性饮食对健康和环境的双重好处越来越感兴趣。这种饮食优先考虑全植物性食物和适度(尽管偶尔排除)动物性食物。然而,在澳大拉西亚,基于植物性饮食和健康结果的证据是有限和多样化的,因此不适合进行系统评价。本综述旨在评估目前的研究状况,确定研究差距,并提出良好的实践建议。咨询的证据基础包括对澳大利亚和新西兰成年人的植物性饮食和心脏代谢健康或死亡率结果的关键研究。大多数研究都是观察性的,在澳大利亚进行,在过去十年内发表,并依赖于大约10-30年前的单一饮食评估。植物性饮食通常使用素食主义、植物或动物蛋白质摄入量或饮食指数等类别进行检查。健康结果包括死亡率、2型糖尿病和胰岛素抵抗、肥胖、心血管疾病和代谢综合征。虽然澳大利亚在植物性饮食和健康结果方面有一个新兴的、普遍有利的证据基础,但新西兰的证据基础仍处于起步阶段。缺乏类似的研究妨碍了判断证据总体确定性的能力,否则,这些证据可以为公共卫生政策和战略提供信息,而无需依赖适用性未经证实的国际研究。在澳大拉西亚,植物和动物来源的食物在健康、可持续饮食中的比例作用是一个尚未充分探索的研究领域,具有潜在的深远影响,特别是在营养充足性和健康与环境综合影响方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plant-based diets and health outcomes in Australia and New Zealand.

There is mounting interest in the dual health and environmental benefits of plant-based diets. Such diets prioritise whole foods of plant origin and moderate (though occasionally exclude) animal-sourced foods. However, the evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes in Australasia is limited and diverse, making it unsuitable for systematic review. This review aimed to assess the current state of play, identify research gaps, and suggest good practice recommendations. The consulted evidence base included key studies on plant-based diets and cardiometabolic health or mortality outcomes in Australian and New Zealand adults. Most studies were observational, conducted in Australia, published within the last decade, and relied on a single dietary assessment about 10-30 years ago. Plant-based diets were often examined using categories of vegetarianism, intake of plant or animal protein, or dietary indices. Health outcomes included mortality, type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. While Australia has an emerging and generally favourable evidence base on plant-based diets and health outcomes, New Zealand's evidence base is still nascent. The lack of similar studies hinders the ability to judge the overall certainty of evidence, which could otherwise inform public health policies and strategies without relying on international studies with unconfirmed applicability. The proportional role of plant- and animal-sourced foods in healthy, sustainable diets in Australasia is an underexplored research area with potentially far-reaching implications, especially concerning nutrient adequacy and the combined health and environmental impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信