巴西低收入大学生压力感知量表的效度。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974
Ana Clara Arrais Rosa, Lorrane Cristine Conceição da Silva, Jacyara Christina Carvalho Azevedo, Rhavenna Thais Silva Oliveira, Ruhena Kelber Abrão Ferreira, Maíra Tristão Parra, Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho, Augusto César Ferreira de Moraes, Marcus Vinícius Nascimento-Ferreira
{"title":"巴西低收入大学生压力感知量表的效度。","authors":"Ana Clara Arrais Rosa, Lorrane Cristine Conceição da Silva, Jacyara Christina Carvalho Azevedo, Rhavenna Thais Silva Oliveira, Ruhena Kelber Abrão Ferreira, Maíra Tristão Parra, Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho, Augusto César Ferreira de Moraes, Marcus Vinícius Nascimento-Ferreira","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We tested the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale, an online questionnaire, among college students from low-income Brazilian regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 195 college students from a region with a Gini index of 0.56 for the validity study and a subsample of 117 students for the reliability study, where we evaluated the Perceived Stress Scale with the 14 original items. We also applied the shortened version of the Brief Symptom Inventory with 18 items (BSI-18). The psychometric properties analyzed, including temporal stability, internal consistency, and structural and convergent validity, were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, unsupervised machine learning, and confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire showed acceptable reliability (temporal stability [rho ≥ 0.32] and internal consistency [alpha ≥ 0.79]). In construct validity, we identified two clusters, \"helplessness\" and \"self-efficacy\", as structure solutions for our sample via unsupervised machine learning. An acceptable fit for the two-factor structure of the scale was indicated by multiple indices (chi-square/degrees of freedom [χ2/df] = 119/76; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.916; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.930; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.054; standardized root mean-squared residual [SRMR] = 0.078)) on confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, convergent validity was supported by significant correlations of the BSI-18 Global Severity Index score with perception of helplessness (rho = 0.71) and self-efficacy (rho = -0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Perceived Stress Scale, which is an online tool, is a reliable and valid self-report tool for college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"59 ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Perceived Stress Scale in Brazilian low-income college students.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Clara Arrais Rosa, Lorrane Cristine Conceição da Silva, Jacyara Christina Carvalho Azevedo, Rhavenna Thais Silva Oliveira, Ruhena Kelber Abrão Ferreira, Maíra Tristão Parra, Heráclito Barbosa Carvalho, Augusto César Ferreira de Moraes, Marcus Vinícius Nascimento-Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We tested the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale, an online questionnaire, among college students from low-income Brazilian regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 195 college students from a region with a Gini index of 0.56 for the validity study and a subsample of 117 students for the reliability study, where we evaluated the Perceived Stress Scale with the 14 original items. We also applied the shortened version of the Brief Symptom Inventory with 18 items (BSI-18). The psychometric properties analyzed, including temporal stability, internal consistency, and structural and convergent validity, were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, unsupervised machine learning, and confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire showed acceptable reliability (temporal stability [rho ≥ 0.32] and internal consistency [alpha ≥ 0.79]). In construct validity, we identified two clusters, \\\"helplessness\\\" and \\\"self-efficacy\\\", as structure solutions for our sample via unsupervised machine learning. An acceptable fit for the two-factor structure of the scale was indicated by multiple indices (chi-square/degrees of freedom [χ2/df] = 119/76; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.916; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.930; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.054; standardized root mean-squared residual [SRMR] = 0.078)) on confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, convergent validity was supported by significant correlations of the BSI-18 Global Severity Index score with perception of helplessness (rho = 0.71) and self-efficacy (rho = -0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Perceived Stress Scale, which is an online tool, is a reliable and valid self-report tool for college students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059005974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对巴西低收入地区大学生的压力感知量表进行信度和效度测试。方法:我们对来自基尼系数为0.56的地区的195名大学生进行了效度研究,并对117名大学生进行了信度研究,其中我们用14个原始项目评估了感知压力量表。我们还采用了缩短版的18项简要症状量表(BSI-18)。使用Spearman相关系数、Cronbach α系数、无监督机器学习和验证性因子分析来评估心理测量特性,包括时间稳定性、内部一致性、结构效度和收敛效度。结果:问卷具有可接受的信度(时间稳定性[rho≥0.32],内部一致性[alpha≥0.79])。在结构效度方面,我们通过无监督机器学习确定了“无助”和“自我效能”两个集群作为我们样本的结构解决方案。多个指标表明量表的双因素结构符合可接受的拟合(χ2/自由度[χ2/df] = 119/76;Tucker-Lewis指数[TLI] = 0.916;比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.930;近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.054;验证性因子分析的标准化均方根残差[SRMR] = 0.078)。此外,BSI-18全球严重性指数得分与无助感(rho = 0.71)和自我效能感(rho = -0.42)显著相关支持了收敛效度。结论:压力感知量表是一种可靠、有效的大学生自我报告工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of Perceived Stress Scale in Brazilian low-income college students.

Objective: We tested the reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale, an online questionnaire, among college students from low-income Brazilian regions.

Methods: We assessed 195 college students from a region with a Gini index of 0.56 for the validity study and a subsample of 117 students for the reliability study, where we evaluated the Perceived Stress Scale with the 14 original items. We also applied the shortened version of the Brief Symptom Inventory with 18 items (BSI-18). The psychometric properties analyzed, including temporal stability, internal consistency, and structural and convergent validity, were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, unsupervised machine learning, and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: The questionnaire showed acceptable reliability (temporal stability [rho ≥ 0.32] and internal consistency [alpha ≥ 0.79]). In construct validity, we identified two clusters, "helplessness" and "self-efficacy", as structure solutions for our sample via unsupervised machine learning. An acceptable fit for the two-factor structure of the scale was indicated by multiple indices (chi-square/degrees of freedom [χ2/df] = 119/76; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.916; Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.930; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.054; standardized root mean-squared residual [SRMR] = 0.078)) on confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, convergent validity was supported by significant correlations of the BSI-18 Global Severity Index score with perception of helplessness (rho = 0.71) and self-efficacy (rho = -0.42).

Conclusion: The Perceived Stress Scale, which is an online tool, is a reliable and valid self-report tool for college students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信