In vitro efficacy of aqueous PVP-iodine solution below 5% as alternative to preoperative antisepsis in ophthalmology as the basis for an in vivo study.

Purpose: Pre-operative antisepsis of the conjunctiva is indicated prior to intraocular surgery to prevent post-interventional endophthalmitis. In Germany, antisepsis with 5% povidone-iodine (PI) aqueous solution is explicitly required prior to intravitreal injections (IVI), and also generally recommended for intraocular surgery. However, this concentration often leads to a foreign body sensation and an unpleasant burning in combination with dry eye symptoms. Postoperative eye pain, persistent corneal epithelial defects, and a risk of keratitis are further side effects. Due to the repetitive nature of IVI, these symptoms are particularly present in IVI patients. A reduced concentration may be favorable to decrease patient discomfort. A 1.25% PI solution does not increase the iodine concentration in the aqueous humor and is also used for prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum and for preoperative antisepsis; in both cases the renal iodine excretion stays in a physiological range thus thyroid diseases are no contraindication for its use. Thus, the efficacy of reduced concentrations of PI should be evaluated in vitro.

Methods: PI with dilutions below 5% (0.625 - 2.5% serial 1:2 dilution) was tested in vitro in a quantitative suspension assay and in a quantitative carrier test without and with addition of matrices to identify their antimicrobial effect against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Cutibacterium acnes and Candida albicans.

Results: No differences in the antimicrobial effect was seen due to reduced concentrations of PI in comparison to a 5% solution. However, a trend was seen regarding the required contact time of the antiseptic solution.

Conclusion: The in-vitro tests have shown adequate antisepsis of 1.25% PI prior to intraocular surgery. However, it is important to pay attention to a sufficient contact time of the antiseptic of about 1 min before ophthalmologic intervention. In order to give final recommendations, in vivo testing is needed to build a robust data foundation.