超声内镜引导下胆道病变组织采集的诊断率及临床影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daiki Agarie, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Shota Harai, Kazuko Yamamoto, Takuji Okusaka
{"title":"超声内镜引导下胆道病变组织采集的诊断率及临床影响。","authors":"Daiki Agarie, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Shota Harai, Kazuko Yamamoto, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for biliary lesions have not been fully established due to limited evidence. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of EUS-TA for biliary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic yields and adverse event rates of EUS-TA for biliary lesions were evaluated. The subject cases were only limited to cases in which the biliary lesions itself was punctured. Diagnostic yields of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided biopsy/cytology performed within the same period were also evaluated to assess the additional effect of EUS-TA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUS-TA was attempted in 71 cases (28 hilar bile duct, 19 distal bile duct, 4 ampulla of Vater, and 20 gallbladder), and the final diagnosis was malignant in 54 cases (76.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA were 96.3% (52/54), 100% (17/17), and 97.2% (69/71), respectively. Adverse events were observed in one case (1.4%, peritonitis). The accuracy of ERC biopsy/cytology was 82.5% (212/257 cases); additional EUS-TA diagnosed 30 cases as malignant additionally and improved the accuracy (94.2%; 242/257 cases; p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TA is an accurate and safe diagnostic test for biliary lesions. The addition of EUS-TA may be considered when there is a suspicion of a false-negative ERC result.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic yields and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for biliary lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Daiki Agarie, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Shota Harai, Kazuko Yamamoto, Takuji Okusaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for biliary lesions have not been fully established due to limited evidence. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of EUS-TA for biliary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic yields and adverse event rates of EUS-TA for biliary lesions were evaluated. The subject cases were only limited to cases in which the biliary lesions itself was punctured. Diagnostic yields of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided biopsy/cytology performed within the same period were also evaluated to assess the additional effect of EUS-TA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EUS-TA was attempted in 71 cases (28 hilar bile duct, 19 distal bile duct, 4 ampulla of Vater, and 20 gallbladder), and the final diagnosis was malignant in 54 cases (76.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA were 96.3% (52/54), 100% (17/17), and 97.2% (69/71), respectively. Adverse events were observed in one case (1.4%, peritonitis). The accuracy of ERC biopsy/cytology was 82.5% (212/257 cases); additional EUS-TA diagnosed 30 cases as malignant additionally and improved the accuracy (94.2%; 242/257 cases; p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TA is an accurate and safe diagnostic test for biliary lesions. The addition of EUS-TA may be considered when there is a suspicion of a false-negative ERC result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:由于证据有限,内镜超声引导下的组织采集(EUS-TA)对胆道病变的诊断率尚未完全确定。我们的目的是阐明EUS-TA对胆道病变的疗效。方法:评价EUS-TA对胆道病变的诊断率和不良事件发生率。对象病例仅局限于胆道病变本身被穿刺的病例。在同一时期进行的内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)引导下的活检/细胞学诊断也被评估,以评估EUS-TA的额外效果。结果:行EUS-TA 71例(门部胆管28例,远端胆管19例,壶腹4例,胆囊20例),最终诊断为恶性54例(76.1%)。EUS-TA的敏感性为96.3%(52/54),特异性为100%(17/17),准确性为97.2%(69/71)。不良事件1例(1.4%,腹膜炎)。ERC活检/细胞学检查准确率为82.5%(212/257例);EUS-TA额外诊断出30例恶性,提高了准确率(94.2%;242/257的病例;结论:EUS-TA是一种准确、安全的胆道病变诊断方法。当怀疑ERC结果为假阴性时,可以考虑添加EUS-TA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic yields and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for biliary lesions.

Background/purpose: Diagnostic yields of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for biliary lesions have not been fully established due to limited evidence. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of EUS-TA for biliary lesions.

Methods: Diagnostic yields and adverse event rates of EUS-TA for biliary lesions were evaluated. The subject cases were only limited to cases in which the biliary lesions itself was punctured. Diagnostic yields of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-guided biopsy/cytology performed within the same period were also evaluated to assess the additional effect of EUS-TA.

Results: EUS-TA was attempted in 71 cases (28 hilar bile duct, 19 distal bile duct, 4 ampulla of Vater, and 20 gallbladder), and the final diagnosis was malignant in 54 cases (76.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA were 96.3% (52/54), 100% (17/17), and 97.2% (69/71), respectively. Adverse events were observed in one case (1.4%, peritonitis). The accuracy of ERC biopsy/cytology was 82.5% (212/257 cases); additional EUS-TA diagnosed 30 cases as malignant additionally and improved the accuracy (94.2%; 242/257 cases; p < .01).

Conclusions: EUS-TA is an accurate and safe diagnostic test for biliary lesions. The addition of EUS-TA may be considered when there is a suspicion of a false-negative ERC result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信