Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Afia Salman, Tooba Saqib, Laiba Zafar, Hoorain Jamil, Alishba Adnan Janjua, Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar, Hamna Ahmed Khan, Hajra Zainab Chaudry, Ayesha Ali, Laiba Sanober, Muqaddas Parvez, Hala Najeeb, Abdul Hannan Siddiqui, Salim Surani
{"title":"普格列汀治疗2型糖尿病的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Afia Salman, Tooba Saqib, Laiba Zafar, Hoorain Jamil, Alishba Adnan Janjua, Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar, Hamna Ahmed Khan, Hajra Zainab Chaudry, Ayesha Ali, Laiba Sanober, Muqaddas Parvez, Hala Najeeb, Abdul Hannan Siddiqui, Salim Surani","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03948-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the currently present literature analyzing the effectiveness and safety profile of prusogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, as compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systemic review and meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy based on various MeSH terms was run on: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central, which were then systematically searched from inception till March 2024 to select all relevant Randomized Control Trials (RCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the findings from three RCTs with 957 patients revealed that prusogliptin reduced Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)% levels in T2DM patients significantly [Mean Difference (MD): -0.62, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.74 to -0.50, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p < 0.001] and led to more patients with a HbA1c% ≤ 7% [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.65, 95%CI: 1.94 to 3.61, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p < 0.00001]. However, prusogliptin led to a non-significant increase in weight when compared with placebo (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%, p = 0.551). The safety profile of prusogliptin revealed a non-significant decrease in treatment-emergent adverse events (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 43%, p = 0.64) and a non-significant increase in treatment-emergent serious adverse events (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.96) and drug-related adverse events (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.68 to 1.69, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prusogliptin has a favorable efficacy in attaining glycemic control in patients with T2DM. However, its safety profile yields uncertain outcomes. More literature is required for a definitive result.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of prusogliptin in type-2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim, Afia Salman, Tooba Saqib, Laiba Zafar, Hoorain Jamil, Alishba Adnan Janjua, Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar, Hamna Ahmed Khan, Hajra Zainab Chaudry, Ayesha Ali, Laiba Sanober, Muqaddas Parvez, Hala Najeeb, Abdul Hannan Siddiqui, Salim Surani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-03948-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the currently present literature analyzing the effectiveness and safety profile of prusogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, as compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systemic review and meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy based on various MeSH terms was run on: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central, which were then systematically searched from inception till March 2024 to select all relevant Randomized Control Trials (RCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the findings from three RCTs with 957 patients revealed that prusogliptin reduced Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)% levels in T2DM patients significantly [Mean Difference (MD): -0.62, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.74 to -0.50, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p < 0.001] and led to more patients with a HbA1c% ≤ 7% [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.65, 95%CI: 1.94 to 3.61, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p < 0.00001]. However, prusogliptin led to a non-significant increase in weight when compared with placebo (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%, p = 0.551). The safety profile of prusogliptin revealed a non-significant decrease in treatment-emergent adverse events (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 43%, p = 0.64) and a non-significant increase in treatment-emergent serious adverse events (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.44, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.96) and drug-related adverse events (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.68 to 1.69, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prusogliptin has a favorable efficacy in attaining glycemic control in patients with T2DM. However, its safety profile yields uncertain outcomes. More literature is required for a definitive result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03948-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03948-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在对现有文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,分析新型二肽基肽酶- iv (DPP-4)抑制剂普格列汀与安慰剂在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析符合系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。基于各种MeSH术语的搜索策略在PubMed/Medline、SCOPUS和Cochrane Central上运行,然后从开始到2024年3月进行系统搜索,选择所有相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果:对957例患者的3项随机对照试验结果的分析显示,普格列汀显著降低T2DM患者的血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)%水平[平均差异(MD): -0.62, 95%可信区间(CI): -0.74 ~ -0.50, I2 = 0%, p 2 = 0%, p 2 = 60%, p = 0.551]。普格列汀的安全性显示,治疗后出现的不良事件(OR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.59 ~ 1.38, I2 = 43%, p = 0.64)无显著减少,治疗后出现的严重不良事件(OR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.43 ~ 2.44, I2 = 0%, p = 0.96)和药物相关不良事件(OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.68 ~ 1.69, I2 = 0%, p = 0.76)无显著增加。结论:普格列汀对T2DM患者血糖控制有较好的疗效。然而,它的安全性带来了不确定的结果。需要更多的文献才能得出明确的结果。
Safety and efficacy of prusogliptin in type-2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the currently present literature analyzing the effectiveness and safety profile of prusogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, as compared to placebo in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
Methods: This systemic review and meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy based on various MeSH terms was run on: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central, which were then systematically searched from inception till March 2024 to select all relevant Randomized Control Trials (RCT).
Results: The analysis of the findings from three RCTs with 957 patients revealed that prusogliptin reduced Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)% levels in T2DM patients significantly [Mean Difference (MD): -0.62, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.74 to -0.50, I2 = 0%, p < 0.001] and led to more patients with a HbA1c% ≤ 7% [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.65, 95%CI: 1.94 to 3.61, I2 = 0%, p < 0.00001]. However, prusogliptin led to a non-significant increase in weight when compared with placebo (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.93, I2 = 60%, p = 0.551). The safety profile of prusogliptin revealed a non-significant decrease in treatment-emergent adverse events (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.38, I2 = 43%, p = 0.64) and a non-significant increase in treatment-emergent serious adverse events (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.44, I2 = 0%, p = 0.96) and drug-related adverse events (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.68 to 1.69, I2 = 0%, p = 0.76).
Conclusion: Prusogliptin has a favorable efficacy in attaining glycemic control in patients with T2DM. However, its safety profile yields uncertain outcomes. More literature is required for a definitive result.
期刊介绍:
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.