Tianxiao Feng, Manyu Zhang, Jieying Wang, Yang Li, Yang Cui
{"title":"贝利单抗和telitacicept治疗系统性红斑狼疮患者的疗效和安全性评价:一项回顾性观察性研究的结果。","authors":"Tianxiao Feng, Manyu Zhang, Jieying Wang, Yang Li, Yang Cui","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01640-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore potential predictors within a treat-to-target paradigm. 101 individuals were retrospectively enrolled at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023, receiving either belimumab (n = 50) or telitacicept (n = 51) in conjunction with standard therapy for more than 24 weeks. Key clinical endpoints were evaluated, with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as the primary outcome. Multivariate analysis was employed to investigate factors associated with failure to attain LLDAS. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. At 24 weeks, the rates of attainment of LLDAS were 54.86% in the telitacicept group and 33.13% in patients receiving belimumab (p = 0.048). A larger proportion of patients receiving telitacicept attained prednisone dosages of ≤ 7.5 mg/day (p = 0.012). Improvements in complement C4 levels and the occurrence of severe hypogammaglobulinemia were more pronounced among patients receiving telitacicept, with no differences in SLE Responder Index 4, DORIS remission, and renal response. Treatment with telitacicept (OR = 0.80, p = 0.032) and elevated levels of complement C3 (OR = 0.63, p = 0.003) were associated with a decreased risk of failing to achieve LLDAS. No severe adverse events were documented in both groups. Both belimumab and telitacicept displayed satisfactory effectiveness and safety profiles. Our findings imply telitacicept may offer potential benefits associated with the early attainment of LLDAS and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Restricted by the observational design, the findings require further validation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a retrospective, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Tianxiao Feng, Manyu Zhang, Jieying Wang, Yang Li, Yang Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-025-01640-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore potential predictors within a treat-to-target paradigm. 101 individuals were retrospectively enrolled at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023, receiving either belimumab (n = 50) or telitacicept (n = 51) in conjunction with standard therapy for more than 24 weeks. Key clinical endpoints were evaluated, with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as the primary outcome. Multivariate analysis was employed to investigate factors associated with failure to attain LLDAS. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. At 24 weeks, the rates of attainment of LLDAS were 54.86% in the telitacicept group and 33.13% in patients receiving belimumab (p = 0.048). A larger proportion of patients receiving telitacicept attained prednisone dosages of ≤ 7.5 mg/day (p = 0.012). Improvements in complement C4 levels and the occurrence of severe hypogammaglobulinemia were more pronounced among patients receiving telitacicept, with no differences in SLE Responder Index 4, DORIS remission, and renal response. Treatment with telitacicept (OR = 0.80, p = 0.032) and elevated levels of complement C3 (OR = 0.63, p = 0.003) were associated with a decreased risk of failing to achieve LLDAS. No severe adverse events were documented in both groups. Both belimumab and telitacicept displayed satisfactory effectiveness and safety profiles. Our findings imply telitacicept may offer potential benefits associated with the early attainment of LLDAS and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Restricted by the observational design, the findings require further validation in prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965181/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01640-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01640-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a retrospective, observational study.
This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore potential predictors within a treat-to-target paradigm. 101 individuals were retrospectively enrolled at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023, receiving either belimumab (n = 50) or telitacicept (n = 51) in conjunction with standard therapy for more than 24 weeks. Key clinical endpoints were evaluated, with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as the primary outcome. Multivariate analysis was employed to investigate factors associated with failure to attain LLDAS. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. At 24 weeks, the rates of attainment of LLDAS were 54.86% in the telitacicept group and 33.13% in patients receiving belimumab (p = 0.048). A larger proportion of patients receiving telitacicept attained prednisone dosages of ≤ 7.5 mg/day (p = 0.012). Improvements in complement C4 levels and the occurrence of severe hypogammaglobulinemia were more pronounced among patients receiving telitacicept, with no differences in SLE Responder Index 4, DORIS remission, and renal response. Treatment with telitacicept (OR = 0.80, p = 0.032) and elevated levels of complement C3 (OR = 0.63, p = 0.003) were associated with a decreased risk of failing to achieve LLDAS. No severe adverse events were documented in both groups. Both belimumab and telitacicept displayed satisfactory effectiveness and safety profiles. Our findings imply telitacicept may offer potential benefits associated with the early attainment of LLDAS and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Restricted by the observational design, the findings require further validation in prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.