反映音乐训练差异的大脑激活模式:通过耳朵听与阅读乐谱来识别作品中的背景和结构。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Reiya Horisawa, Keita Umejima, Seizo Azuma, Takeaki Miyamae, Ryugo Hayano, Kuniyoshi L Sakai
{"title":"反映音乐训练差异的大脑激活模式:通过耳朵听与阅读乐谱来识别作品中的背景和结构。","authors":"Reiya Horisawa, Keita Umejima, Seizo Azuma, Takeaki Miyamae, Ryugo Hayano, Kuniyoshi L Sakai","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When practicing a new piece of music, what are the neural substrates influenced by short-term training such as listening to recorded sources or reading sheet music? Do those neural mechanisms reflect the effects of long-term training in music? In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study with intermediate piano players in the middle of acquiring advanced knowledge and skills in music, we compared short-term training of listening to recorded pieces (\"Listen\") and reading sheet music (\"Read\"). Participants were \"Multi-\" and \"Mono-instrumentalist\" groups according to whether they played multiple instruments or only the piano. We used an error-detection task with music stimuli including structural errors made by swapping 2 phrases within a composition, thereby focusing on contextual comprehension of musical phrases. Overall performances were significantly better under Listen than under Read, and significantly better in Multi than in Mono. Moreover, we observed left-lateralized frontal activations under Listen for Multi, whereas bilateral temporo-frontal regions were activated under Read for both groups. Focusing on individual differences under Read, we found a positive correlation between the frontal activations and the accuracy rates for Mono. Overall, our results elucidate how the neural substrates of judgments on structures and context in music are influenced by both long-term and short-term training.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain activation patterns reflecting differences in music training: listening by ear vs. reading sheet music for the recognition of contexts and structures in a composition.\",\"authors\":\"Reiya Horisawa, Keita Umejima, Seizo Azuma, Takeaki Miyamae, Ryugo Hayano, Kuniyoshi L Sakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cercor/bhaf072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When practicing a new piece of music, what are the neural substrates influenced by short-term training such as listening to recorded sources or reading sheet music? Do those neural mechanisms reflect the effects of long-term training in music? In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study with intermediate piano players in the middle of acquiring advanced knowledge and skills in music, we compared short-term training of listening to recorded pieces (\\\"Listen\\\") and reading sheet music (\\\"Read\\\"). Participants were \\\"Multi-\\\" and \\\"Mono-instrumentalist\\\" groups according to whether they played multiple instruments or only the piano. We used an error-detection task with music stimuli including structural errors made by swapping 2 phrases within a composition, thereby focusing on contextual comprehension of musical phrases. Overall performances were significantly better under Listen than under Read, and significantly better in Multi than in Mono. Moreover, we observed left-lateralized frontal activations under Listen for Multi, whereas bilateral temporo-frontal regions were activated under Read for both groups. Focusing on individual differences under Read, we found a positive correlation between the frontal activations and the accuracy rates for Mono. Overall, our results elucidate how the neural substrates of judgments on structures and context in music are influenced by both long-term and short-term training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral cortex\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当练习一段新音乐时,短期训练(如听录音或读乐谱)对神经基质有什么影响?这些神经机制是否反映了长期音乐训练的效果?在本研究中,我们对中级钢琴演奏者进行了功能性磁共振成像研究,在学习高级音乐知识和技能的过程中,我们比较了听录音(“听”)和读乐谱(“读”)的短期训练。根据参与者是演奏多种乐器还是只弹钢琴,他们被分为“多乐器”和“单乐器”两组。我们对音乐刺激进行了错误检测任务,包括在一首乐曲中交换两个乐句所造成的结构错误,从而专注于对乐句的上下文理解。总体性能在“听”下明显好于“读”下,在“多”下明显好于“单声道”。此外,我们还观察到,两组的左侧额叶被激活,而双侧颞额叶被激活。专注于阅读项下的个体差异,我们发现额叶激活与“单声道”的准确率之间存在正相关。总的来说,我们的研究结果阐明了长期和短期训练如何影响音乐结构和背景判断的神经基质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain activation patterns reflecting differences in music training: listening by ear vs. reading sheet music for the recognition of contexts and structures in a composition.

When practicing a new piece of music, what are the neural substrates influenced by short-term training such as listening to recorded sources or reading sheet music? Do those neural mechanisms reflect the effects of long-term training in music? In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study with intermediate piano players in the middle of acquiring advanced knowledge and skills in music, we compared short-term training of listening to recorded pieces ("Listen") and reading sheet music ("Read"). Participants were "Multi-" and "Mono-instrumentalist" groups according to whether they played multiple instruments or only the piano. We used an error-detection task with music stimuli including structural errors made by swapping 2 phrases within a composition, thereby focusing on contextual comprehension of musical phrases. Overall performances were significantly better under Listen than under Read, and significantly better in Multi than in Mono. Moreover, we observed left-lateralized frontal activations under Listen for Multi, whereas bilateral temporo-frontal regions were activated under Read for both groups. Focusing on individual differences under Read, we found a positive correlation between the frontal activations and the accuracy rates for Mono. Overall, our results elucidate how the neural substrates of judgments on structures and context in music are influenced by both long-term and short-term training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信