美国新生儿体外生命支持的发生率、危险因素和结果的种族和性别差异。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lauren R Walker, Laura E Hollinger, Lizmarie Maldonado, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Brian K Stansfield, Natalie Rintoul, Connor Kreese, Heidi J Steflik
{"title":"美国新生儿体外生命支持的发生率、危险因素和结果的种族和性别差异。","authors":"Lauren R Walker, Laura E Hollinger, Lizmarie Maldonado, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Brian K Stansfield, Natalie Rintoul, Connor Kreese, Heidi J Steflik","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of race on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) availability, morbidity, and mortality remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, and location on ECLS outcomes, and identify potential disparities that remain intact using a modern, inclusive cohort of neonates receiving ECLS in the United States. Data were extracted from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database on neonates who received ECLS from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2020. Both adjusted and unadjusted regression models were fitted to study the association between neonatal ECLS outcomes and covariates. During the study period, 6,695 neonates from 47 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic White neonates (45%), males (57%), and hospitals in the Southern region (32%) compromised the largest proportions of ECLS cases and cardiac disease (44%) was the most common indication for ECLS. Hospital region was associated with ECLS duration with hospitals in the Midwest (median 6 days) and West (6 days) having significantly shorter courses than those in the Northeast (7 days) and South (7 days) (p < 0.01). Associations between race/ethnicity, sex, hospital region, and mortality were detected. Non-Hispanic Black neonates (35% mortality), males (37%), and neonates in the Midwest region (34%) experienced lower ECLS mortality rates (all p < 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Sex Disparities in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neonatal Extracorporeal Life Support in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren R Walker, Laura E Hollinger, Lizmarie Maldonado, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Brian K Stansfield, Natalie Rintoul, Connor Kreese, Heidi J Steflik\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The impact of race on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) availability, morbidity, and mortality remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, and location on ECLS outcomes, and identify potential disparities that remain intact using a modern, inclusive cohort of neonates receiving ECLS in the United States. Data were extracted from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database on neonates who received ECLS from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2020. Both adjusted and unadjusted regression models were fitted to study the association between neonatal ECLS outcomes and covariates. During the study period, 6,695 neonates from 47 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic White neonates (45%), males (57%), and hospitals in the Southern region (32%) compromised the largest proportions of ECLS cases and cardiac disease (44%) was the most common indication for ECLS. Hospital region was associated with ECLS duration with hospitals in the Midwest (median 6 days) and West (6 days) having significantly shorter courses than those in the Northeast (7 days) and South (7 days) (p < 0.01). Associations between race/ethnicity, sex, hospital region, and mortality were detected. Non-Hispanic Black neonates (35% mortality), males (37%), and neonates in the Midwest region (34%) experienced lower ECLS mortality rates (all p < 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002423\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种族对体外生命支持(ECLS)可用性、发病率和死亡率的影响仍不明确。我们试图确定种族/民族、性别和地点对ECLS结果的影响,并通过美国接受ECLS的新生儿现代包容性队列确定潜在的差异。数据来自儿童医院协会儿童健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库,涉及2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日接受ECLS的新生儿。拟合调整和未调整的回归模型来研究新生儿ECLS结果与协变量之间的关系。在研究期间,来自47家医院的6,695名新生儿符合纳入标准。非西班牙裔白人新生儿(45%)、男性(57%)和南部地区医院(32%)的ECLS病例比例最大,心脏病(44%)是最常见的ECLS适应症。医院地区与ECLS病程相关,中西部(中位6天)和西部(中位6天)医院病程明显短于东北部(中位7天)和南部(中位7天)(p < 0.01)。发现了种族/民族、性别、医院区域和死亡率之间的关联。非西班牙裔黑人新生儿(35%死亡率)、男性(37%)和中西部地区新生儿(34%)的ECLS死亡率较低(均p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial and Sex Disparities in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neonatal Extracorporeal Life Support in the United States.

The impact of race on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) availability, morbidity, and mortality remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, and location on ECLS outcomes, and identify potential disparities that remain intact using a modern, inclusive cohort of neonates receiving ECLS in the United States. Data were extracted from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database on neonates who received ECLS from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2020. Both adjusted and unadjusted regression models were fitted to study the association between neonatal ECLS outcomes and covariates. During the study period, 6,695 neonates from 47 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic White neonates (45%), males (57%), and hospitals in the Southern region (32%) compromised the largest proportions of ECLS cases and cardiac disease (44%) was the most common indication for ECLS. Hospital region was associated with ECLS duration with hospitals in the Midwest (median 6 days) and West (6 days) having significantly shorter courses than those in the Northeast (7 days) and South (7 days) (p < 0.01). Associations between race/ethnicity, sex, hospital region, and mortality were detected. Non-Hispanic Black neonates (35% mortality), males (37%), and neonates in the Midwest region (34%) experienced lower ECLS mortality rates (all p < 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信