基于面部照片的甲状腺眼病检测深度学习架构的比较分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Amirhossein Aghajani, Mohammad Taher Rajabi, Seyed Mohsen Rafizadeh, Amin Zand, Majid Rezaei, Mohammad Shojaeinia, Elham Rahmanikhah
{"title":"基于面部照片的甲状腺眼病检测深度学习架构的比较分析。","authors":"Amirhossein Aghajani, Mohammad Taher Rajabi, Seyed Mohsen Rafizadeh, Amin Zand, Majid Rezaei, Mohammad Shojaeinia, Elham Rahmanikhah","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-03988-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two artificial intelligence (AI) models, residual neural networks ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, for screening thyroid eye disease (TED) using frontal face photographs, and to test these models under clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1601 face photographs were obtained. These photographs were preprocessed by cropping to a region centered around the eyes. For the deep learning process, photographs from 643 TED patients and 643 healthy individuals were used for training the ResNet models. Additionally, 81 photographs of TED patients and 74 of normal subjects were used as the validation dataset. Finally, 80 TED cases and 80 healthy subjects comprised the test dataset. For application tests under clinical conditions, data from 25 TED patients and 25 healthy individuals were utilized to evaluate the non-inferiority of the AI models, with general ophthalmologists and fellowships as the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set verification of the ResNet-50 AI model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.92, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.93, 0.84, 0.76, and 0.92, respectively. In the application tests under clinical conditions, to evaluate the non-inferiority of the ResNet-50 AI model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.91, 0.84, 0.92, and 0.76, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two models for any of the metrics (all p-values > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Face image-based TED screening using ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 AI models shows acceptable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing TED from healthy subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for thyroid eye disease detection using facial photographs.\",\"authors\":\"Amirhossein Aghajani, Mohammad Taher Rajabi, Seyed Mohsen Rafizadeh, Amin Zand, Majid Rezaei, Mohammad Shojaeinia, Elham Rahmanikhah\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-025-03988-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two artificial intelligence (AI) models, residual neural networks ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, for screening thyroid eye disease (TED) using frontal face photographs, and to test these models under clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1601 face photographs were obtained. These photographs were preprocessed by cropping to a region centered around the eyes. For the deep learning process, photographs from 643 TED patients and 643 healthy individuals were used for training the ResNet models. Additionally, 81 photographs of TED patients and 74 of normal subjects were used as the validation dataset. Finally, 80 TED cases and 80 healthy subjects comprised the test dataset. For application tests under clinical conditions, data from 25 TED patients and 25 healthy individuals were utilized to evaluate the non-inferiority of the AI models, with general ophthalmologists and fellowships as the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set verification of the ResNet-50 AI model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.92, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.93, 0.84, 0.76, and 0.92, respectively. In the application tests under clinical conditions, to evaluate the non-inferiority of the ResNet-50 AI model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.91, 0.84, 0.92, and 0.76, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two models for any of the metrics (all p-values > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Face image-based TED screening using ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 AI models shows acceptable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing TED from healthy subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03988-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-03988-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种人工智能(AI)模型,即残余神经网络ResNet-50和ResNet-101,用于使用正面面部照片筛查甲状腺眼病(TED),并在临床条件下对这些模型进行测试。方法:共获取1601张面部照片。这些照片是通过裁剪到眼睛周围的一个区域进行预处理的。在深度学习过程中,来自643名TED患者和643名健康个体的照片被用于训练ResNet模型。此外,81张TED患者的照片和74张正常受试者的照片被用作验证数据集。最后,80例TED病例和80例健康受试者组成测试数据集。在临床条件下的应用测试中,利用25名TED患者和25名健康个体的数据来评估人工智能模型的非劣效性,以普通眼科医生和研究员为对照组。结果:在ResNet-50人工智能模型的测试集验证中,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.94、0.88、0.64和0.92。对于ResNet-101人工智能模型,这些指标分别为0.93、0.84、0.76和0.92。在临床条件下的应用试验中,评价ResNet-50人工智能模型的非劣效性,AUC为0.82,准确性为0.82,敏感性为0.88,特异性为0.76。对于ResNet-101人工智能模型,这些指标分别为0.91、0.84、0.92和0.76,两个模型之间的任何指标都没有统计学上的显著差异(所有p值均为0.05)。结论:使用ResNet-50和ResNet-101人工智能模型进行基于人脸图像的TED筛查,在区分TED与健康受试者方面具有可接受的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for thyroid eye disease detection using facial photographs.

Purpose: To compare two artificial intelligence (AI) models, residual neural networks ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, for screening thyroid eye disease (TED) using frontal face photographs, and to test these models under clinical conditions.

Methods: A total of 1601 face photographs were obtained. These photographs were preprocessed by cropping to a region centered around the eyes. For the deep learning process, photographs from 643 TED patients and 643 healthy individuals were used for training the ResNet models. Additionally, 81 photographs of TED patients and 74 of normal subjects were used as the validation dataset. Finally, 80 TED cases and 80 healthy subjects comprised the test dataset. For application tests under clinical conditions, data from 25 TED patients and 25 healthy individuals were utilized to evaluate the non-inferiority of the AI models, with general ophthalmologists and fellowships as the control group.

Results: In the test set verification of the ResNet-50 AI model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.94, 0.88, 0.64, and 0.92, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.93, 0.84, 0.76, and 0.92, respectively. In the application tests under clinical conditions, to evaluate the non-inferiority of the ResNet-50 AI model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively. For the ResNet-101 AI model, these metrics were 0.91, 0.84, 0.92, and 0.76, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two models for any of the metrics (all p-values > 0.05).

Conclusions: Face image-based TED screening using ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 AI models shows acceptable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for distinguishing TED from healthy subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信