{"title":"了解儿童保育不稳定性与情绪困扰的关系","authors":"Mateus M. Mazzaferro, Sihong Liu, Philip Fisher","doi":"10.1111/cch.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>For families with young children, securing reliable childcare may present a significant challenge. Rising costs, limited resources and the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened the precarity of childcare arrangements. Childcare precarity, defined as a state of insecure or unreliable childcare arrangements while parents work or attend school, reflects unpredictability in family life and early care and education settings and has important implications for families' economic and psychosocial well-being. This study aims at broadening the conceptualization of childcare precarity to include childcare search status and examine its association with caregiver and child emotional distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 3115 caregivers in the United States (88% female, 67% white) who completed the RAPID Survey between November 2022 and December 2023 and reported working or attending school. We assess whether including a childcare search status as an indicator of precarity improves the cross-sectional prediction of caregiver and child emotional distress beyond commonly used indicators (unreliability and disruptions). Using a person-centred approach, we also conduct an exploratory latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct experiences of childcare precarity and associated emotional distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Childcare unreliability and disruptions were associated with caregiver distress. For children, unreliability was associated with fear/anxiety, while disruptions were associated with fussiness/defiance. Childcare search status was also linked to both caregiver and child emotional distress, improving model fit compared to baseline models. Our exploratory LCA identified a five-class solution as optimal, with emotional distress outcomes varying significantly across classes and correlating with levels of precarity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of a multidimensional approach to childcare precarity. Identifying distinct precarity profiles can inform targeted policy interventions to support diverse family needs. Future research should validate these findings and explore the broader impact of early life unpredictability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55262,"journal":{"name":"Child Care Health and Development","volume":"51 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Association Between Childcare Precarity and Emotional Distress\",\"authors\":\"Mateus M. Mazzaferro, Sihong Liu, Philip Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cch.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>For families with young children, securing reliable childcare may present a significant challenge. Rising costs, limited resources and the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened the precarity of childcare arrangements. Childcare precarity, defined as a state of insecure or unreliable childcare arrangements while parents work or attend school, reflects unpredictability in family life and early care and education settings and has important implications for families' economic and psychosocial well-being. This study aims at broadening the conceptualization of childcare precarity to include childcare search status and examine its association with caregiver and child emotional distress.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants were 3115 caregivers in the United States (88% female, 67% white) who completed the RAPID Survey between November 2022 and December 2023 and reported working or attending school. We assess whether including a childcare search status as an indicator of precarity improves the cross-sectional prediction of caregiver and child emotional distress beyond commonly used indicators (unreliability and disruptions). Using a person-centred approach, we also conduct an exploratory latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct experiences of childcare precarity and associated emotional distress.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Childcare unreliability and disruptions were associated with caregiver distress. For children, unreliability was associated with fear/anxiety, while disruptions were associated with fussiness/defiance. Childcare search status was also linked to both caregiver and child emotional distress, improving model fit compared to baseline models. Our exploratory LCA identified a five-class solution as optimal, with emotional distress outcomes varying significantly across classes and correlating with levels of precarity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of a multidimensional approach to childcare precarity. Identifying distinct precarity profiles can inform targeted policy interventions to support diverse family needs. Future research should validate these findings and explore the broader impact of early life unpredictability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Care Health and Development\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Care Health and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cch.70076\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cch.70076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the Association Between Childcare Precarity and Emotional Distress
Background
For families with young children, securing reliable childcare may present a significant challenge. Rising costs, limited resources and the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened the precarity of childcare arrangements. Childcare precarity, defined as a state of insecure or unreliable childcare arrangements while parents work or attend school, reflects unpredictability in family life and early care and education settings and has important implications for families' economic and psychosocial well-being. This study aims at broadening the conceptualization of childcare precarity to include childcare search status and examine its association with caregiver and child emotional distress.
Methods
Participants were 3115 caregivers in the United States (88% female, 67% white) who completed the RAPID Survey between November 2022 and December 2023 and reported working or attending school. We assess whether including a childcare search status as an indicator of precarity improves the cross-sectional prediction of caregiver and child emotional distress beyond commonly used indicators (unreliability and disruptions). Using a person-centred approach, we also conduct an exploratory latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct experiences of childcare precarity and associated emotional distress.
Results
Childcare unreliability and disruptions were associated with caregiver distress. For children, unreliability was associated with fear/anxiety, while disruptions were associated with fussiness/defiance. Childcare search status was also linked to both caregiver and child emotional distress, improving model fit compared to baseline models. Our exploratory LCA identified a five-class solution as optimal, with emotional distress outcomes varying significantly across classes and correlating with levels of precarity.
Discussion
Our findings highlight the importance of a multidimensional approach to childcare precarity. Identifying distinct precarity profiles can inform targeted policy interventions to support diverse family needs. Future research should validate these findings and explore the broader impact of early life unpredictability.
期刊介绍：
Child: care, health and development is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers dealing with all aspects of the health and development of children and young people. We aim to attract quantitative and qualitative research papers relevant to people from all disciplines working in child health. We welcome studies which examine the effects of social and environmental factors on health and development as well as those dealing with clinical issues, the organization of services and health policy. We particularly encourage the submission of studies related to those who are disadvantaged by physical, developmental, emotional and social problems. The journal also aims to collate important research findings and to provide a forum for discussion of global child health issues.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
