Aneeta Channar, Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi, Muhammad Ali Khan, Arifa Bibi, Akshat Saxena, Nikita Tripathi, Ahmad Iftikhar, Ammad Raina, Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Muhammad Husnain
{"title":"四联体疗法治疗新诊断的符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Aneeta Channar, Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi, Muhammad Ali Khan, Arifa Bibi, Akshat Saxena, Nikita Tripathi, Ahmad Iftikhar, Ammad Raina, Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Muhammad Husnain","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma continues to evolve. Recently, the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to the triplet regimen, comprising a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and a steroid, for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TENDMM) has shown promising results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of quadruplet therapy with an anti-CD38 mAb compared to a triplet regimen.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from inception to July 2024 identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy and safety outcomes were derived using random-effects meta-analysis. Summarized outcomes include hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), odds ratios (OR) for response rates, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, and grade 3 or higher adverse events (G ≥ 3 AEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five RCTs involving 2963 patients were included. A statistically significant PFS was observed for quadruplet therapy when compared to the triplet regimen (HR 0.44; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.35–0.56). PFS benefit was consistent for the standard risk (SR) group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.52) and high risk (HiR) group (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41–0.92). No statistically significant benefit was observed for OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). A statistically significant benefit was observed for the overall response rate (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02–3.06) and MRD negativity rate (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.79–3.99). No significant differences were observed for G ≥ 3 AE (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.92–1.58), lymphopenia (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.89), and anemia (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83–1.37). However, a significantly increased risk was observed for all-grade thrombocytopenia (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.37–1.97), neutropenia (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.67–3.02) and infections (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07–3.31).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Quadruplet therapy demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile, with consistent benefit across subgroups. The findings support its potential as the new standard of care for TENDMM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Quadruplet Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aneeta Channar, Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi, Muhammad Ali Khan, Arifa Bibi, Akshat Saxena, Nikita Tripathi, Ahmad Iftikhar, Ammad Raina, Kaneez Zahra Rubab Khakwani, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Muhammad Husnain\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.70171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma continues to evolve. Recently, the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to the triplet regimen, comprising a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and a steroid, for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TENDMM) has shown promising results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of quadruplet therapy with an anti-CD38 mAb compared to a triplet regimen.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from inception to July 2024 identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy and safety outcomes were derived using random-effects meta-analysis. Summarized outcomes include hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), odds ratios (OR) for response rates, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, and grade 3 or higher adverse events (G ≥ 3 AEs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five RCTs involving 2963 patients were included. A statistically significant PFS was observed for quadruplet therapy when compared to the triplet regimen (HR 0.44; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.35–0.56). PFS benefit was consistent for the standard risk (SR) group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.52) and high risk (HiR) group (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41–0.92). No statistically significant benefit was observed for OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). A statistically significant benefit was observed for the overall response rate (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02–3.06) and MRD negativity rate (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.79–3.99). No significant differences were observed for G ≥ 3 AE (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.92–1.58), lymphopenia (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.89), and anemia (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83–1.37). However, a significantly increased risk was observed for all-grade thrombocytopenia (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.37–1.97), neutropenia (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.67–3.02) and infections (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07–3.31).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quadruplet therapy demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile, with consistent benefit across subgroups. The findings support its potential as the new standard of care for TENDMM.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer reports\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnr2.70171\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 多发性骨髓瘤的治疗形势不断变化。最近,在治疗符合移植条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(TENDMM)的三联疗法(包括蛋白酶体抑制剂、免疫调节剂和类固醇)中加入抗CD38单克隆抗体(mAbs)显示出了良好的效果。 目的 评估抗CD38 mAb四联疗法与三联疗法相比的总体疗效和安全性。 方法 对 Medline、Scopus 和 EMBASE 数据库从开始到 2024 年 7 月的数据进行系统检索,确定了相关的随机对照试验 (RCT)。采用随机效应荟萃分析法得出疗效和安全性结果。总结的结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的危险比(HR)、反应率的几率比(OR)、可测量残留疾病(MRD)阴性率以及 3 级或以上不良事件(G ≥ 3 AEs)。 结果 共纳入五项研究,涉及 2963 名患者。与三联疗法相比,四联疗法的 PFS 有统计学意义(HR 0.44;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.35-0.56)。标准风险(SR)组(HR 0.38;95% CI 0.27-0.52)和高风险(HiR)组(HR 0.62;95% CI 0.41-0.92)的PFS获益一致。在 OS(HR 0.55;95% CI 0.28-1.08)方面未观察到有统计学意义的获益。在总体反应率(OR 1.77;95% CI 1.02-3.06)和 MRD 阴性率(OR 2.67;95% CI 1.79-3.99)方面观察到了具有统计学意义的获益。在 G≥3 AE(OR 1.21;95% CI 0.92-1.58)、淋巴细胞减少(OR 1.09;95% CI 0.62-1.89)和贫血(OR 1.06;95% CI 0.83-1.37)方面未观察到明显差异。然而,观察到全血细胞减少症(OR 1.64;95% CI 1.37-1.97)、中性粒细胞减少症(OR 2.24;95% CI 1.67-3.02)和感染(OR 1.88;95% CI 1.07-3.31)的风险明显增加。 结论 四联疗法具有良好的疗效和安全性,各亚组患者均可从中获益。研究结果支持四联疗法成为治疗TENDMM的新标准。
Efficacy and Safety of Quadruplet Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background
The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma continues to evolve. Recently, the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to the triplet regimen, comprising a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and a steroid, for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TENDMM) has shown promising results.
Aims
To evaluate the overall efficacy and safety of quadruplet therapy with an anti-CD38 mAb compared to a triplet regimen.
Methods
A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from inception to July 2024 identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy and safety outcomes were derived using random-effects meta-analysis. Summarized outcomes include hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), odds ratios (OR) for response rates, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, and grade 3 or higher adverse events (G ≥ 3 AEs).
Results
Five RCTs involving 2963 patients were included. A statistically significant PFS was observed for quadruplet therapy when compared to the triplet regimen (HR 0.44; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.35–0.56). PFS benefit was consistent for the standard risk (SR) group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.52) and high risk (HiR) group (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41–0.92). No statistically significant benefit was observed for OS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.08). A statistically significant benefit was observed for the overall response rate (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.02–3.06) and MRD negativity rate (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.79–3.99). No significant differences were observed for G ≥ 3 AE (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.92–1.58), lymphopenia (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.62–1.89), and anemia (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83–1.37). However, a significantly increased risk was observed for all-grade thrombocytopenia (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.37–1.97), neutropenia (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.67–3.02) and infections (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07–3.31).
Conclusion
Quadruplet therapy demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile, with consistent benefit across subgroups. The findings support its potential as the new standard of care for TENDMM.