ACRM健康公平研究优秀奖:残疾人在获得医疗保健时遇到的障碍5794

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jessica Jarvis, Amy Houtrow
{"title":"ACRM健康公平研究优秀奖:残疾人在获得医疗保健时遇到的障碍5794","authors":"Jessica Jarvis,&nbsp;Amy Houtrow","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To characterize access to health care experiences reported by people with disabilities living in the United States since 2014.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of research published since 2014 and also interviewed people with disabilities living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-one individuals living in or near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that are disabled and/or care for someone who is disabled.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Systematic literature review and interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The screening protocol identified a total of 5007 articles. Eighty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were included. Articles were of varying quality of reporting, but none were excluded based on their score. Twenty-six percent (26%) (n=22) of the articles captured data from individuals with developmental disabilities, 17% (n=14) with a physical disability, 16% (n=13) from those with mental illness, 16% (n=13) did not restrict any disability type, 13% (n=11) with a sensory disability, 10% (n=8) collected data from multiple types, and only 2% (n=2) were from those with cognitive disabilities. Most studies (n=45, 54%) did not focus on a specific aspect of health care but looked broadly at the system. Dental (n=8) and primary care (n=6) were the next most common services examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There are multiple themes identified from across the access to health care factors: approachability, availability/accommodations, affordability, acceptability, and appropriateness of health care services. Additionally, we identified the following themes on how access to care impacts people with disabilities: unmet needs, delayed care, negative impact on well-being, and fractured trust in the health care system.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings confirm that access to health care is limited and unjust for people with disabilities and that limited access does widespread harm. Notably, beyond the very real and direct harms caused to an individual's health by inadequate health care, when accessing care is difficult, it increases experiences of stress and depression, drains individual and societal resources, and negatively impacts relationships, careers, and other necessary components of life.</div><div>This resulted from work supported by the FISA Foundation.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 4","pages":"Page e10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACRM Excellence in Health Equity Research Award: Barriers People with Disabilities Experience When Accessing Health Care 5794\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Jarvis,&nbsp;Amy Houtrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To characterize access to health care experiences reported by people with disabilities living in the United States since 2014.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of research published since 2014 and also interviewed people with disabilities living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Twenty-one individuals living in or near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that are disabled and/or care for someone who is disabled.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Systematic literature review and interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The screening protocol identified a total of 5007 articles. Eighty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were included. Articles were of varying quality of reporting, but none were excluded based on their score. Twenty-six percent (26%) (n=22) of the articles captured data from individuals with developmental disabilities, 17% (n=14) with a physical disability, 16% (n=13) from those with mental illness, 16% (n=13) did not restrict any disability type, 13% (n=11) with a sensory disability, 10% (n=8) collected data from multiple types, and only 2% (n=2) were from those with cognitive disabilities. Most studies (n=45, 54%) did not focus on a specific aspect of health care but looked broadly at the system. Dental (n=8) and primary care (n=6) were the next most common services examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There are multiple themes identified from across the access to health care factors: approachability, availability/accommodations, affordability, acceptability, and appropriateness of health care services. Additionally, we identified the following themes on how access to care impacts people with disabilities: unmet needs, delayed care, negative impact on well-being, and fractured trust in the health care system.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings confirm that access to health care is limited and unjust for people with disabilities and that limited access does widespread harm. Notably, beyond the very real and direct harms caused to an individual's health by inadequate health care, when accessing care is difficult, it increases experiences of stress and depression, drains individual and societal resources, and negatively impacts relationships, careers, and other necessary components of life.</div><div>This resulted from work supported by the FISA Foundation.</div></div><div><h3>Disclosures</h3><div>none.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"106 4\",\"pages\":\"Page e10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325000516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析2014年以来居住在美国的残疾人报告的获得医疗保健经历的特征。DesignWe对2014年以来发表的研究进行了系统回顾,并采访了居住在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的残疾人。SettingNot适用。参与者:21位居住在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡或附近的残疾人和/或照顾残疾人的人。干预:系统的文献回顾和访谈。主要结局指标筛选方案共确定了5007篇文章。83篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入。文章的报道质量参差不齐,但没有一篇文章因得分而被排除在外。26% (n=22)的文章收集了发育障碍患者的数据,17% (n=14)的文章收集了身体残疾患者的数据,16% (n=13)的文章收集了精神疾病患者的数据,16% (n=13)的文章没有限制任何残疾类型,13% (n=11)的文章收集了感觉残疾的数据,10% (n=8)的文章收集了多种类型的数据,只有2% (n=2)的文章收集了认知残疾患者的数据。大多数研究(n=45, 54%)没有关注医疗保健的特定方面,而是广泛地关注系统。牙科(n=8)和初级保健(n=6)是第二常见的检查服务。结果从获得卫生保健的因素中确定了多个主题:可接近性、可获得性/住宿、可负担性、可接受性和卫生保健服务的适当性。此外,我们确定了以下关于获得护理如何影响残疾人的主题:未满足的需求、延迟的护理、对福祉的负面影响以及对医疗保健系统的信任破裂。结论:调查结果证实,残疾人获得医疗保健的机会有限且不公平,而且这种有限的机会造成了广泛的伤害。值得注意的是,除了医疗服务不足对个人健康造成非常真实和直接的伤害之外,当难以获得医疗服务时,它还会增加压力和抑郁的体验,耗尽个人和社会资源,并对人际关系、事业和生活的其他必要组成部分产生负面影响。这是FISA基金会支持的工作成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ACRM Excellence in Health Equity Research Award: Barriers People with Disabilities Experience When Accessing Health Care 5794

Objectives

To characterize access to health care experiences reported by people with disabilities living in the United States since 2014.

Design

We conducted a systematic review of research published since 2014 and also interviewed people with disabilities living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Setting

Not applicable.

Participants

Twenty-one individuals living in or near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that are disabled and/or care for someone who is disabled.

Interventions

Systematic literature review and interviews.

Main Outcome Measures

The screening protocol identified a total of 5007 articles. Eighty-three articles met inclusion criteria and were included. Articles were of varying quality of reporting, but none were excluded based on their score. Twenty-six percent (26%) (n=22) of the articles captured data from individuals with developmental disabilities, 17% (n=14) with a physical disability, 16% (n=13) from those with mental illness, 16% (n=13) did not restrict any disability type, 13% (n=11) with a sensory disability, 10% (n=8) collected data from multiple types, and only 2% (n=2) were from those with cognitive disabilities. Most studies (n=45, 54%) did not focus on a specific aspect of health care but looked broadly at the system. Dental (n=8) and primary care (n=6) were the next most common services examined.

Results

There are multiple themes identified from across the access to health care factors: approachability, availability/accommodations, affordability, acceptability, and appropriateness of health care services. Additionally, we identified the following themes on how access to care impacts people with disabilities: unmet needs, delayed care, negative impact on well-being, and fractured trust in the health care system.

Conclusions

Findings confirm that access to health care is limited and unjust for people with disabilities and that limited access does widespread harm. Notably, beyond the very real and direct harms caused to an individual's health by inadequate health care, when accessing care is difficult, it increases experiences of stress and depression, drains individual and societal resources, and negatively impacts relationships, careers, and other necessary components of life.
This resulted from work supported by the FISA Foundation.

Disclosures

none.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信