{"title":"超过CTS5评分:一种预测激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌患者长期预后的新nomogram","authors":"Mingqi Zhang , Jing Yu , Liang Qin , Jiayi Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2025.101201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HR+/HER2+ breast cancer are exposed to high late-recurrence risk. CTS5 is widely used in predicting late recurrence of HR+/HER2- patients. This study aims to explore the application of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ patients and develop a novel model with greater predictive efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We collect 26605 HR+/HER2+ breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 from SEER database. The main survival outcome was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after 5 years of diagnosis. CTS5 score was calculated. Survival analysis was performed. Cox regression identified significant clinicopathological parameters, which were used to construct a nomogram.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were stratified into CTS5 low- (<em>n</em> = 10,217, 38.4%), intermediate- (<em>n</em> = 9,257, 34.8%) and high-risk (<em>n</em> = 7,131, 26.8%) groups. Patients in CTS5 high-risk subgroup were more likely to be older at diagnosis, postmenopausal and have tumors with higher TN stage and grades (all <em>p</em> < 0.001). High-risk patients showed worse BCSS compared with intermediate- and low-risk patients (cumulative hazard: BCSS, 7.4%, 3.2% and 1.7%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Cox regression suggested age, TN stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were BCSS associated (all <em>p</em> < 0.001) while grade wasn't. A nomogram based on age, tumor size and lymph nodes was constructed. The AUC values of the ROC curves for 6, 8, and 10-year BCSS were 0.687, 0.698, and 0.700. The nomogram demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood ratio statistic compared to CTS5 (518.9 vs. 483.8, <em>p</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We confirmed the prognostic value of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer and developed a new nomogram with superior predictive performance for long-term prognosis compared to CTS5.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55193,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cancer","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond CTS5 score: A novel nomogram predicting long-term prognosis in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Mingqi Zhang , Jing Yu , Liang Qin , Jiayi Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2025.101201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>HR+/HER2+ breast cancer are exposed to high late-recurrence risk. CTS5 is widely used in predicting late recurrence of HR+/HER2- patients. This study aims to explore the application of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ patients and develop a novel model with greater predictive efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We collect 26605 HR+/HER2+ breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 from SEER database. The main survival outcome was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after 5 years of diagnosis. CTS5 score was calculated. Survival analysis was performed. Cox regression identified significant clinicopathological parameters, which were used to construct a nomogram.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients were stratified into CTS5 low- (<em>n</em> = 10,217, 38.4%), intermediate- (<em>n</em> = 9,257, 34.8%) and high-risk (<em>n</em> = 7,131, 26.8%) groups. Patients in CTS5 high-risk subgroup were more likely to be older at diagnosis, postmenopausal and have tumors with higher TN stage and grades (all <em>p</em> < 0.001). High-risk patients showed worse BCSS compared with intermediate- and low-risk patients (cumulative hazard: BCSS, 7.4%, 3.2% and 1.7%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Cox regression suggested age, TN stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were BCSS associated (all <em>p</em> < 0.001) while grade wasn't. A nomogram based on age, tumor size and lymph nodes was constructed. The AUC values of the ROC curves for 6, 8, and 10-year BCSS were 0.687, 0.698, and 0.700. The nomogram demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood ratio statistic compared to CTS5 (518.9 vs. 483.8, <em>p</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We confirmed the prognostic value of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer and developed a new nomogram with superior predictive performance for long-term prognosis compared to CTS5.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027225000285\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027225000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond CTS5 score: A novel nomogram predicting long-term prognosis in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer
Background
HR+/HER2+ breast cancer are exposed to high late-recurrence risk. CTS5 is widely used in predicting late recurrence of HR+/HER2- patients. This study aims to explore the application of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ patients and develop a novel model with greater predictive efficacy.
Methods
We collect 26605 HR+/HER2+ breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 from SEER database. The main survival outcome was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after 5 years of diagnosis. CTS5 score was calculated. Survival analysis was performed. Cox regression identified significant clinicopathological parameters, which were used to construct a nomogram.
Results
Patients were stratified into CTS5 low- (n = 10,217, 38.4%), intermediate- (n = 9,257, 34.8%) and high-risk (n = 7,131, 26.8%) groups. Patients in CTS5 high-risk subgroup were more likely to be older at diagnosis, postmenopausal and have tumors with higher TN stage and grades (all p < 0.001). High-risk patients showed worse BCSS compared with intermediate- and low-risk patients (cumulative hazard: BCSS, 7.4%, 3.2% and 1.7%, p < 0.001). Cox regression suggested age, TN stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were BCSS associated (all p < 0.001) while grade wasn't. A nomogram based on age, tumor size and lymph nodes was constructed. The AUC values of the ROC curves for 6, 8, and 10-year BCSS were 0.687, 0.698, and 0.700. The nomogram demonstrated a significantly higher likelihood ratio statistic compared to CTS5 (518.9 vs. 483.8, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
We confirmed the prognostic value of CTS5 in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer and developed a new nomogram with superior predictive performance for long-term prognosis compared to CTS5.
期刊介绍:
Current Problems in Cancer seeks to promote and disseminate innovative, transformative, and impactful data on patient-oriented cancer research and clinical care. Specifically, the journal''s scope is focused on reporting the results of well-designed cancer studies that influence/alter practice or identify new directions in clinical cancer research. These studies can include novel therapeutic approaches, new strategies for early diagnosis, cancer clinical trials, and supportive care, among others. Papers that focus solely on laboratory-based or basic science research are discouraged. The journal''s format also allows, on occasion, for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering articles that present dynamic material that influences the oncology field.