SIRS和qSOFA对脓脓狗脓毒症的诊断价值

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q3 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Hatice Esra Çolakoğlu , Ecenur Karaca
{"title":"SIRS和qSOFA对脓脓狗脓毒症的诊断价值","authors":"Hatice Esra Çolakoğlu ,&nbsp;Ecenur Karaca","doi":"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate the usability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and <em>quick sequential organ failure assessment</em> (qSOFA) scores developed for the rapid, reliable and accurate detection of sepsis and organ damage in dogs with pyometra. In the study, dogs with clinical findings (depression, anorexia, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, fever), diagnosed with pyometra as a result of gynecological, clinical and laboratory examinations and treated surgically (n = 20) were included in the pyometra group. Healthy dogs that underwent routine ovariohysterectomy (n = 20) were added to the control group. In both groups, complete blood and serum biochemistry (aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, creatine kinase) analyses were performed at the time of diagnosis in the preoperative period. SIRS and qSOFA scores were measured in both groups before surgery and on the third postoperative day. According to the data obtained as a result of the study, the sensitivity and selectivity of qSOFA score in the diagnosis of pyometra were determined to be 65 % and 100 %, respectively. SIRS score was found to have a sensitivity of 95 % and a selectivity of 100 %. The AUC values of SIRS and qSOFA scores were determined as 0.985 and 0.896, respectively. These results indicate that the qSOFA score has good performance in the diagnosis of pyometra, but lower accuracy than the SIRS score, and the SIRS score has high accuracy in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra. SIRS is a more accurate and reliable screening tool in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra at risk of sepsis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23131,"journal":{"name":"Theriogenology","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 117420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of SIRS and qSOFA in the diagnosis of sepsis in dogs with pyometra\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Esra Çolakoğlu ,&nbsp;Ecenur Karaca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate the usability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and <em>quick sequential organ failure assessment</em> (qSOFA) scores developed for the rapid, reliable and accurate detection of sepsis and organ damage in dogs with pyometra. In the study, dogs with clinical findings (depression, anorexia, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, fever), diagnosed with pyometra as a result of gynecological, clinical and laboratory examinations and treated surgically (n = 20) were included in the pyometra group. Healthy dogs that underwent routine ovariohysterectomy (n = 20) were added to the control group. In both groups, complete blood and serum biochemistry (aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, creatine kinase) analyses were performed at the time of diagnosis in the preoperative period. SIRS and qSOFA scores were measured in both groups before surgery and on the third postoperative day. According to the data obtained as a result of the study, the sensitivity and selectivity of qSOFA score in the diagnosis of pyometra were determined to be 65 % and 100 %, respectively. SIRS score was found to have a sensitivity of 95 % and a selectivity of 100 %. The AUC values of SIRS and qSOFA scores were determined as 0.985 and 0.896, respectively. These results indicate that the qSOFA score has good performance in the diagnosis of pyometra, but lower accuracy than the SIRS score, and the SIRS score has high accuracy in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra. SIRS is a more accurate and reliable screening tool in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra at risk of sepsis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theriogenology\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theriogenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X25001463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X25001463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分的可用性,这些评分用于快速、可靠和准确地检测脓脓症和脓脓狗的器官损伤。本研究将有临床表现(抑郁、厌食、虚弱、多尿、渴渴、发热),经妇科、临床及实验室检查诊断为脓膜瘤并接受手术治疗的犬(n = 20)纳入脓膜瘤组。对照组为接受常规卵巢子宫切除术的健康犬(n = 20)。两组患者术前诊断时进行全血及血清生化(天冬氨酸转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、丙氨酸转氨酶、肌酐、血尿素氮、白蛋白、肌酸激酶)分析。两组患者术前和术后第3天分别测量SIRS和qSOFA评分。根据本研究获得的数据,确定qSOFA评分诊断脓膜炎的敏感性为65%,选择性为100%。发现SIRS评分的敏感性为95%,选择性为100%。SIRS和qSOFA评分的AUC值分别为0.985和0.896。这些结果表明,qSOFA评分对脓脓的诊断效果较好,但准确性低于SIRS评分,而SIRS评分对犬脓脓的诊断准确性较高。SIRS是一种更准确和可靠的筛查工具,用于脓脓症风险的狗的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of SIRS and qSOFA in the diagnosis of sepsis in dogs with pyometra
This study aims to evaluate the usability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores developed for the rapid, reliable and accurate detection of sepsis and organ damage in dogs with pyometra. In the study, dogs with clinical findings (depression, anorexia, weakness, polyuria, polydipsia, fever), diagnosed with pyometra as a result of gynecological, clinical and laboratory examinations and treated surgically (n = 20) were included in the pyometra group. Healthy dogs that underwent routine ovariohysterectomy (n = 20) were added to the control group. In both groups, complete blood and serum biochemistry (aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, creatine kinase) analyses were performed at the time of diagnosis in the preoperative period. SIRS and qSOFA scores were measured in both groups before surgery and on the third postoperative day. According to the data obtained as a result of the study, the sensitivity and selectivity of qSOFA score in the diagnosis of pyometra were determined to be 65 % and 100 %, respectively. SIRS score was found to have a sensitivity of 95 % and a selectivity of 100 %. The AUC values of SIRS and qSOFA scores were determined as 0.985 and 0.896, respectively. These results indicate that the qSOFA score has good performance in the diagnosis of pyometra, but lower accuracy than the SIRS score, and the SIRS score has high accuracy in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra. SIRS is a more accurate and reliable screening tool in the diagnosis of dogs with pyometra at risk of sepsis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theriogenology
Theriogenology 农林科学-生殖生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
387
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Theriogenology provides an international forum for researchers, clinicians, and industry professionals in animal reproductive biology. This acclaimed journal publishes articles on a wide range of topics in reproductive and developmental biology, of domestic mammal, avian, and aquatic species as well as wild species which are the object of veterinary care in research or conservation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信