通过可再生能源发电制气实现沼气直接甲烷化:基于真实工业数据的技术经济评估

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Emanuele Giglio , Micaela Bianco , Giuseppe Zanardi , Enrico Catizzone , Girolamo Giordano , Massimo Migliori
{"title":"通过可再生能源发电制气实现沼气直接甲烷化:基于真实工业数据的技术经济评估","authors":"Emanuele Giglio ,&nbsp;Micaela Bianco ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Zanardi ,&nbsp;Enrico Catizzone ,&nbsp;Girolamo Giordano ,&nbsp;Massimo Migliori","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a design and techno-economic assessment of different Power-to-Gas configurations based on direct biogas methanation and renewable electricity. The proposed concept integrates the anaerobic digestion of organic waste with the methanation of carbon dioxide using green hydrogen. Yearly data of an anaerobic digestion process operating at the industrial scale were considered. The methanation unit was designed through two cooled fixed-bed reactors in series; the first had 14 parallel tubes that were 2.5 m long, and the second one had 18 tubes (each one 1.5 m long). A global carbon dioxide conversion above 98 % occurs in the unit, ensuring an outlet composition suitable for injection into the natural gas distribution grid. Different options for energy storage were thus considered; hydrogen storage in pressurized tanks (‘Buffer’), electrochemical storage in batteries (‘Battery’), and a hybrid combination of the two systems (‘Hybrid’). A ≈40 MW photovoltaic park provided the required energy input. The configuration with hydrogen storage tanks was established as the most promising option based on current trends, medium-term, and target projections scenarios of capital costs. These three cost scenarios led to a synthetic natural gas (SNG) production cost range of 2.3–4.2, 1.6–2.9, and 1.1–2.0 euros per cubic meter, respectively. This configuration requires a ≈35 MW electrolysis unit and about 100 tons of hydrogen storage capacity. Considering the current methane price, results indicate that current capital costs of photovoltaics, electrolysis, and H<sub>2</sub> storage still represent an obstacle to overcome, before achieving the profitability of the concept.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119775"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct biogas methanation via renewable-based Power-to-Gas: Techno-economic assessment based on real industrial data\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Giglio ,&nbsp;Micaela Bianco ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Zanardi ,&nbsp;Enrico Catizzone ,&nbsp;Girolamo Giordano ,&nbsp;Massimo Migliori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents a design and techno-economic assessment of different Power-to-Gas configurations based on direct biogas methanation and renewable electricity. The proposed concept integrates the anaerobic digestion of organic waste with the methanation of carbon dioxide using green hydrogen. Yearly data of an anaerobic digestion process operating at the industrial scale were considered. The methanation unit was designed through two cooled fixed-bed reactors in series; the first had 14 parallel tubes that were 2.5 m long, and the second one had 18 tubes (each one 1.5 m long). A global carbon dioxide conversion above 98 % occurs in the unit, ensuring an outlet composition suitable for injection into the natural gas distribution grid. Different options for energy storage were thus considered; hydrogen storage in pressurized tanks (‘Buffer’), electrochemical storage in batteries (‘Battery’), and a hybrid combination of the two systems (‘Hybrid’). A ≈40 MW photovoltaic park provided the required energy input. The configuration with hydrogen storage tanks was established as the most promising option based on current trends, medium-term, and target projections scenarios of capital costs. These three cost scenarios led to a synthetic natural gas (SNG) production cost range of 2.3–4.2, 1.6–2.9, and 1.1–2.0 euros per cubic meter, respectively. This configuration requires a ≈35 MW electrolysis unit and about 100 tons of hydrogen storage capacity. Considering the current methane price, results indicate that current capital costs of photovoltaics, electrolysis, and H<sub>2</sub> storage still represent an obstacle to overcome, before achieving the profitability of the concept.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"332 \",\"pages\":\"Article 119775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002985\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002985","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了基于沼气直接甲烷化和可再生电力的不同电制气配置的设计和技术经济评价。提出的概念将有机废物的厌氧消化与使用绿色氢的二氧化碳甲烷化相结合。考虑了工业规模厌氧消化过程的年度数据。甲烷化装置采用两个冷却固定床反应器串联设计;第一个有14根平行的管子,长2.5米,第二个有18根管子(每根长1.5米)。该装置的全球二氧化碳转化率超过98%,确保出口成分适合注入天然气配网。因此,考虑了不同的能源储存方案;加压储氢罐(“Buffer”)、电池电化学储氢(“Battery”)以及两种系统的混合组合(“hybrid”)。一个约40兆瓦的光伏园区提供了所需的能量输入。基于当前趋势、中期和资本成本的目标预测,氢储罐的配置被认为是最有前途的选择。这三种成本情景导致合成天然气(SNG)的生产成本分别为每立方米2.3-4.2欧元、1.6-2.9欧元和1.1-2.0欧元。这种配置需要约35mw的电解装置和约100吨的储氢能力。考虑到目前的甲烷价格,研究结果表明,在实现该概念的盈利能力之前,目前光伏、电解和H2储存的资本成本仍然是一个需要克服的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct biogas methanation via renewable-based Power-to-Gas: Techno-economic assessment based on real industrial data
This paper presents a design and techno-economic assessment of different Power-to-Gas configurations based on direct biogas methanation and renewable electricity. The proposed concept integrates the anaerobic digestion of organic waste with the methanation of carbon dioxide using green hydrogen. Yearly data of an anaerobic digestion process operating at the industrial scale were considered. The methanation unit was designed through two cooled fixed-bed reactors in series; the first had 14 parallel tubes that were 2.5 m long, and the second one had 18 tubes (each one 1.5 m long). A global carbon dioxide conversion above 98 % occurs in the unit, ensuring an outlet composition suitable for injection into the natural gas distribution grid. Different options for energy storage were thus considered; hydrogen storage in pressurized tanks (‘Buffer’), electrochemical storage in batteries (‘Battery’), and a hybrid combination of the two systems (‘Hybrid’). A ≈40 MW photovoltaic park provided the required energy input. The configuration with hydrogen storage tanks was established as the most promising option based on current trends, medium-term, and target projections scenarios of capital costs. These three cost scenarios led to a synthetic natural gas (SNG) production cost range of 2.3–4.2, 1.6–2.9, and 1.1–2.0 euros per cubic meter, respectively. This configuration requires a ≈35 MW electrolysis unit and about 100 tons of hydrogen storage capacity. Considering the current methane price, results indicate that current capital costs of photovoltaics, electrolysis, and H2 storage still represent an obstacle to overcome, before achieving the profitability of the concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信