机器人的负反馈比人类的负反馈更容易被接受:反馈对人机信任和协作的影响

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Hongzhou Xuan, Guibing He
{"title":"机器人的负反馈比人类的负反馈更容易被接受:反馈对人机信任和协作的影响","authors":"Hongzhou Xuan,&nbsp;Guibing He","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intelligent robots continue to transcend their traditional roles as mere tools, evolving to actively engage in collaborative teamwork. Feedback from teammates is a critical component of effective team dynamics. This research investigates how feedback source (robot vs. human teammate) affects behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration through a functional task (Study 1) and a social task (Study 2). It further examines the mediating role of feedback acceptance and the moderating effect of feedback valence (positive vs. negative). The findings reveal that negative feedback from a robot teammate, compare to that from a human teammate, leads to a higher feedback acceptance, which further fosters greater behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration toward the robot. However, the source of positive feedback, whether from a robot or a human teammate, causes no significant differences in recipients’ responses. This research delineates the potential advantages of future robot colleagues in delivering negative feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 115333"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative feedback from robots is received better than that from humans: The effect of feedback on human–robot trust and collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Hongzhou Xuan,&nbsp;Guibing He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intelligent robots continue to transcend their traditional roles as mere tools, evolving to actively engage in collaborative teamwork. Feedback from teammates is a critical component of effective team dynamics. This research investigates how feedback source (robot vs. human teammate) affects behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration through a functional task (Study 1) and a social task (Study 2). It further examines the mediating role of feedback acceptance and the moderating effect of feedback valence (positive vs. negative). The findings reveal that negative feedback from a robot teammate, compare to that from a human teammate, leads to a higher feedback acceptance, which further fosters greater behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration toward the robot. However, the source of positive feedback, whether from a robot or a human teammate, causes no significant differences in recipients’ responses. This research delineates the potential advantages of future robot colleagues in delivering negative feedback.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001560\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能机器人继续超越其仅仅作为工具的传统角色,进化为积极参与协作团队工作。来自队友的反馈是有效团队动力的关键组成部分。本研究通过功能性任务(研究1)和社会性任务(研究2)考察了反馈源(机器人vs人类队友)对行为信任和未来合作意向的影响,并进一步考察了反馈接受度的中介作用和反馈效价(积极vs消极)的调节作用。研究结果表明,与人类队友的负面反馈相比,机器人队友的负面反馈会导致更高的反馈接受度,这进一步培养了对机器人更大的行为信任和未来合作的意愿。然而,积极反馈的来源,无论是来自机器人还是人类队友,在接受者的反应上没有显著差异。这项研究描绘了未来机器人同事在提供负面反馈方面的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negative feedback from robots is received better than that from humans: The effect of feedback on human–robot trust and collaboration
Intelligent robots continue to transcend their traditional roles as mere tools, evolving to actively engage in collaborative teamwork. Feedback from teammates is a critical component of effective team dynamics. This research investigates how feedback source (robot vs. human teammate) affects behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration through a functional task (Study 1) and a social task (Study 2). It further examines the mediating role of feedback acceptance and the moderating effect of feedback valence (positive vs. negative). The findings reveal that negative feedback from a robot teammate, compare to that from a human teammate, leads to a higher feedback acceptance, which further fosters greater behavioral trust and intention for future collaboration toward the robot. However, the source of positive feedback, whether from a robot or a human teammate, causes no significant differences in recipients’ responses. This research delineates the potential advantages of future robot colleagues in delivering negative feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信