互动网络模式与学生认知和情绪过程的关系:来自个体和群体层面的证据

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zhongjian Liu , Hainuo Liu , Yuan Tian , Xinxiao Nie , Mengjie Liu
{"title":"互动网络模式与学生认知和情绪过程的关系:来自个体和群体层面的证据","authors":"Zhongjian Liu ,&nbsp;Hainuo Liu ,&nbsp;Yuan Tian ,&nbsp;Xinxiao Nie ,&nbsp;Mengjie Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analysing the processes of effective computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is a prominent area of research in education. Within the community of enquiry framework, group social interaction patterns are essential for enhancing learners' cognitive and emotional processes. This study examined the online collaborative learning processes of 66 university students over an eight-week blended course. Process and perception data were collected from multiple sources, including surveys, log records, and sentence content analysis. Employing social network and content analyses, we examined the network patterns formed by different group interactions and identified individual and group differences. The multilevel analysis results indicated that group density and centralisation were generally not correlated with the learners’ expressions of cognitive viewpoints, perceived task value, or satisfaction. However, the individual degree centrality was significantly and positively correlated with the expression of viewpoints, perceived task value, and satisfaction, whereas the betweenness centrality was negatively correlated with satisfaction. Furthermore, the perceived task value mediates the relationship between the degree of centrality and satisfaction. This study expands the literature on the CSCL process research by incorporating social network parameters at different levels, shedding light on the relationships between individuals and groups in collaboration, and offering insights into the design and instructional practices of online collaborative learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 105309"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between interactive network patterns and students’ cognitive and emotional processes: Evidence from the individual and group levels\",\"authors\":\"Zhongjian Liu ,&nbsp;Hainuo Liu ,&nbsp;Yuan Tian ,&nbsp;Xinxiao Nie ,&nbsp;Mengjie Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Analysing the processes of effective computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is a prominent area of research in education. Within the community of enquiry framework, group social interaction patterns are essential for enhancing learners' cognitive and emotional processes. This study examined the online collaborative learning processes of 66 university students over an eight-week blended course. Process and perception data were collected from multiple sources, including surveys, log records, and sentence content analysis. Employing social network and content analyses, we examined the network patterns formed by different group interactions and identified individual and group differences. The multilevel analysis results indicated that group density and centralisation were generally not correlated with the learners’ expressions of cognitive viewpoints, perceived task value, or satisfaction. However, the individual degree centrality was significantly and positively correlated with the expression of viewpoints, perceived task value, and satisfaction, whereas the betweenness centrality was negatively correlated with satisfaction. Furthermore, the perceived task value mediates the relationship between the degree of centrality and satisfaction. This study expands the literature on the CSCL process research by incorporating social network parameters at different levels, shedding light on the relationships between individuals and groups in collaboration, and offering insights into the design and instructional practices of online collaborative learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000776\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000776","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析有效的计算机支持协同学习的过程是教育领域的一个重要研究领域。在探究社区框架内,群体社会互动模式对增强学习者的认知和情感过程至关重要。本研究考察了66名大学生在为期8周的混合课程中的在线协作学习过程。过程和感知数据从多个来源收集,包括调查、日志记录和句子内容分析。通过社会网络和内容分析,我们研究了不同群体互动形成的网络模式,并确定了个体和群体的差异。多层次分析结果表明,群体密度和集中度与学习者的认知观点表达、任务价值感知和满意度没有显著相关性。个体度中心性与观点表达、任务价值感知、满意度呈显著正相关,而中间度中心性与满意度呈显著负相关。感知任务价值在中心性与满意度之间起中介作用。本研究通过纳入不同层次的社会网络参数,拓展了CSCL过程研究的文献,揭示了协作中个人和群体之间的关系,并为在线协作学习的设计和教学实践提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships between interactive network patterns and students’ cognitive and emotional processes: Evidence from the individual and group levels
Analysing the processes of effective computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is a prominent area of research in education. Within the community of enquiry framework, group social interaction patterns are essential for enhancing learners' cognitive and emotional processes. This study examined the online collaborative learning processes of 66 university students over an eight-week blended course. Process and perception data were collected from multiple sources, including surveys, log records, and sentence content analysis. Employing social network and content analyses, we examined the network patterns formed by different group interactions and identified individual and group differences. The multilevel analysis results indicated that group density and centralisation were generally not correlated with the learners’ expressions of cognitive viewpoints, perceived task value, or satisfaction. However, the individual degree centrality was significantly and positively correlated with the expression of viewpoints, perceived task value, and satisfaction, whereas the betweenness centrality was negatively correlated with satisfaction. Furthermore, the perceived task value mediates the relationship between the degree of centrality and satisfaction. This study expands the literature on the CSCL process research by incorporating social network parameters at different levels, shedding light on the relationships between individuals and groups in collaboration, and offering insights into the design and instructional practices of online collaborative learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信