企业系统顾问之间的观点差异:对医疗保健技术参考框架的探讨

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
William Olivera , Aaron Baird , Lars Mathiassen
{"title":"企业系统顾问之间的观点差异:对医疗保健技术参考框架的探讨","authors":"William Olivera ,&nbsp;Aaron Baird ,&nbsp;Lars Mathiassen","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although researchers have investigated how organizations work with consultants to navigate complexities and uncertainties in enterprise system (ES) implementation, we know little about how consultants view ES implementation projects. Moreover, ES consultants are typically assumed to be homogenous in their assumptions, expectations, and knowledge, with little emphasis on how their different roles impact perceptions. Against this backdrop, we adapt Technology Frame of Reference (TFR) theory to investigate how differences in perspectives between two types of consultants, vendor and independent consultants, manifest during ES implementation in the health care context. Our approach results in two contributions: 1) identification of similarities and differences in how distinct consultant types perceive ES implementations in health care, and 2) systematic application of TFR across roles within a profession rather than across stakeholders within a specific organizational context. We discuss these contributions and their implications in relation to ES consulting and TFR theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in perspectives between enterprise system consultants: An inquiry into technology frame of reference in health care\",\"authors\":\"William Olivera ,&nbsp;Aaron Baird ,&nbsp;Lars Mathiassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although researchers have investigated how organizations work with consultants to navigate complexities and uncertainties in enterprise system (ES) implementation, we know little about how consultants view ES implementation projects. Moreover, ES consultants are typically assumed to be homogenous in their assumptions, expectations, and knowledge, with little emphasis on how their different roles impact perceptions. Against this backdrop, we adapt Technology Frame of Reference (TFR) theory to investigate how differences in perspectives between two types of consultants, vendor and independent consultants, manifest during ES implementation in the health care context. Our approach results in two contributions: 1) identification of similarities and differences in how distinct consultant types perceive ES implementations in health care, and 2) systematic application of TFR across roles within a profession rather than across stakeholders within a specific organizational context. We discuss these contributions and their implications in relation to ES consulting and TFR theory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Organization\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772725000181\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772725000181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管研究人员已经调查了组织如何与顾问合作,以应对企业系统(ES)实施中的复杂性和不确定性,但我们对顾问如何看待ES实施项目知之甚少。此外,通常假定ES顾问在他们的假设、期望和知识方面是同质的,很少强调他们的不同角色如何影响感知。在此背景下,我们采用技术参考框架(TFR)理论来研究供应商和独立顾问这两种类型的顾问之间的观点差异在医疗保健环境中ES实施过程中的表现。我们的方法有两个贡献:1)确定不同类型的咨询师对医疗保健中ES实施的看法的异同;2)在一个专业中跨角色系统地应用TFR,而不是在一个特定的组织背景下跨利益相关者。我们将讨论这些贡献及其对ES咨询和TFR理论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in perspectives between enterprise system consultants: An inquiry into technology frame of reference in health care
Although researchers have investigated how organizations work with consultants to navigate complexities and uncertainties in enterprise system (ES) implementation, we know little about how consultants view ES implementation projects. Moreover, ES consultants are typically assumed to be homogenous in their assumptions, expectations, and knowledge, with little emphasis on how their different roles impact perceptions. Against this backdrop, we adapt Technology Frame of Reference (TFR) theory to investigate how differences in perspectives between two types of consultants, vendor and independent consultants, manifest during ES implementation in the health care context. Our approach results in two contributions: 1) identification of similarities and differences in how distinct consultant types perceive ES implementations in health care, and 2) systematic application of TFR across roles within a profession rather than across stakeholders within a specific organizational context. We discuss these contributions and their implications in relation to ES consulting and TFR theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信