平民颅脑枪伤的手术与非手术疗法

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wesley Shoap , George Austin Crabill , Roboan Guillen , Kaleb Derouen , Jack Leoni , Zhide Fang , Berje Shammassian
{"title":"平民颅脑枪伤的手术与非手术疗法","authors":"Wesley Shoap ,&nbsp;George Austin Crabill ,&nbsp;Roboan Guillen ,&nbsp;Kaleb Derouen ,&nbsp;Jack Leoni ,&nbsp;Zhide Fang ,&nbsp;Berje Shammassian","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Craniocerebral gunshot wounds in the civilian population constitute a devastating subset of traumatic<!--> <!-->brain injuries (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine the association of mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) among craniocerebral gunshot patients based on timing and type of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The<!--> <!-->trauma database was queried for GSWH<!--> <!-->patients ages 15 and older who received neurosurgical intervention from January 1st<!--> <!-->2016 to June 1st<!--> <!-->2023. Operative notes were reviewed and patients were then divided into three groups; intracranial pressure monitor only with medical treatment (ICP), primary decompressive craniectomy (pDC), or secondary decompressive craniectomy (sDC). The Surviving Penetrating Injury to the Brain (SPIN) score was calculated. Outcomes included mortality, ICU LOS, and GOS-E.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 72 patients were identified who underwent either decompressive craniectomies or ICP monitoring. Mean SPIN scores were similar: ICP, pDC and sDC (30.5, 32.67, 31.55 (p = 0.4252)). When comparing two groups, the odds of death was higher in the ICP group compared to the pDC group (OR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 1.06, 14.35). With regard to hospital trajectory, ICU LOS (mean days) was different among the groups: ICP, pDC, sDC (16.7, 17.4, 23.4; p = 0.0002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mortality was reduced with primary decompressive craniectomy when compared to ICP monitoring with medical management alone and is associated with shorter ICU LOS compared to secondary decompressive craniectomy. In the appropriately selected patient, early and aggressive decompression should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 102022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical versus nonsurgical management of civilian craniocerebral gunshot injuries\",\"authors\":\"Wesley Shoap ,&nbsp;George Austin Crabill ,&nbsp;Roboan Guillen ,&nbsp;Kaleb Derouen ,&nbsp;Jack Leoni ,&nbsp;Zhide Fang ,&nbsp;Berje Shammassian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Craniocerebral gunshot wounds in the civilian population constitute a devastating subset of traumatic<!--> <!-->brain injuries (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine the association of mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) among craniocerebral gunshot patients based on timing and type of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The<!--> <!-->trauma database was queried for GSWH<!--> <!-->patients ages 15 and older who received neurosurgical intervention from January 1st<!--> <!-->2016 to June 1st<!--> <!-->2023. Operative notes were reviewed and patients were then divided into three groups; intracranial pressure monitor only with medical treatment (ICP), primary decompressive craniectomy (pDC), or secondary decompressive craniectomy (sDC). The Surviving Penetrating Injury to the Brain (SPIN) score was calculated. Outcomes included mortality, ICU LOS, and GOS-E.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 72 patients were identified who underwent either decompressive craniectomies or ICP monitoring. Mean SPIN scores were similar: ICP, pDC and sDC (30.5, 32.67, 31.55 (p = 0.4252)). When comparing two groups, the odds of death was higher in the ICP group compared to the pDC group (OR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 1.06, 14.35). With regard to hospital trajectory, ICU LOS (mean days) was different among the groups: ICP, pDC, sDC (16.7, 17.4, 23.4; p = 0.0002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Mortality was reduced with primary decompressive craniectomy when compared to ICP monitoring with medical management alone and is associated with shorter ICU LOS compared to secondary decompressive craniectomy. In the appropriately selected patient, early and aggressive decompression should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925000349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical versus nonsurgical management of civilian craniocerebral gunshot injuries

Introduction

Craniocerebral gunshot wounds in the civilian population constitute a devastating subset of traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine the association of mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) among craniocerebral gunshot patients based on timing and type of intervention.

Methods

The trauma database was queried for GSWH patients ages 15 and older who received neurosurgical intervention from January 1st 2016 to June 1st 2023. Operative notes were reviewed and patients were then divided into three groups; intracranial pressure monitor only with medical treatment (ICP), primary decompressive craniectomy (pDC), or secondary decompressive craniectomy (sDC). The Surviving Penetrating Injury to the Brain (SPIN) score was calculated. Outcomes included mortality, ICU LOS, and GOS-E.

Results

Overall, 72 patients were identified who underwent either decompressive craniectomies or ICP monitoring. Mean SPIN scores were similar: ICP, pDC and sDC (30.5, 32.67, 31.55 (p = 0.4252)). When comparing two groups, the odds of death was higher in the ICP group compared to the pDC group (OR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 1.06, 14.35). With regard to hospital trajectory, ICU LOS (mean days) was different among the groups: ICP, pDC, sDC (16.7, 17.4, 23.4; p = 0.0002).

Conclusion

Mortality was reduced with primary decompressive craniectomy when compared to ICP monitoring with medical management alone and is associated with shorter ICU LOS compared to secondary decompressive craniectomy. In the appropriately selected patient, early and aggressive decompression should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信