病人病情恶化的实时监测系统:一项实用的集群随机对照试验

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato
{"title":"病人病情恶化的实时监测系统:一项实用的集群随机对照试验","authors":"Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; <i>P</i> = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; <i>P</i> = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由注册护士输入的关注叙事交流(CONCERN)早期预警系统(EWS)在其机器学习算法中使用实时护理监控记录模式来识别病情恶化风险。我们进行了一项为期 1 年的多地点实用性试验,对 2 个医疗系统的 74 个临床科室(37 个干预科室;37 个常规护理科室)进行了分组随机化。符合条件的成人住院患者也被纳入其中。我们测试了护理团队了解 CONCERN EWS 的患者与护理团队未了解 CONCERN EWS 的患者的治疗效果是否存在差异。主要结果是院内死亡率(以瞬时风险进行检验)和住院时间。次要结果是心肺骤停、败血症、意外转入重症监护室和 30 天再入院。在 60,893 次住院治疗中(33,024 次干预治疗;27,869 次常规治疗),干预组患者的瞬时死亡风险降低了 35.6%(调整后危险比 (HR),0.64;95% 置信区间 (CI),0.53-0.78;P < 0.0001),住院时间缩短了 11.2%(调整后发病率比,0.91;95% CI,0.90-0.93;P <;0.0001),脓毒症瞬时风险降低了 7.5%(调整后 HR,0.93;95% CI,0.86-0.99;P = 0.0317),与常规护理组相比,非预期重症监护室转院的瞬时风险增加了 24.9%(调整后 HR,1.25;95% CI,1.09-1.43;P = 0.0011)。无不良事件报告。基于机器学习的 EWS 以护理监控模式为模型,降低了住院病人病情恶化的风险,并具有统计学意义。ClinicalTrials.gov 注册:NCT03911687。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial

The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; P < 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; P < 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; P = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; P = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信