Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato
{"title":"病人病情恶化的实时监测系统:一项实用的集群随机对照试验","authors":"Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; <i>P</i> = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. Rossetti, Patricia C. Dykes, Chris Knaplund, Sandy Cho, Jennifer Withall, Graham Lowenthal, David Albers, Rachel Y. Lee, Haomiao Jia, Suzanne Bakken, Min-Jeoung Kang, Frank Y. Chang, Li Zhou, David W. Bates, Temiloluwa Daramola, Fang Liu, Jessica Schwartz-Dillard, Mai Tran, Syed Mohtashim Abbas Bokhari, Jennifer Thate, Kenrick D. Cato\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; <i>P</i> = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial
The COmmunicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) early warning system (EWS) uses real-time nursing surveillance documentation patterns in its machine learning algorithm to identify deterioration risk. We conducted a 1-year, multisite, pragmatic trial with cluster-randomization of 74 clinical units (37 intervention; 37 usual care) across 2 health systems. Eligible adult hospital encounters were included. We tested if outcomes differed between patients whose care teams were and patients whose care teams were not informed by the CONCERN EWS. Coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality (examined as instantaneous risk) and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis, unanticipated intensive care unit transfers and 30-day hospital readmission. Among 60,893 hospital encounters (33,024 intervention; 27,869 usual care), intervention group encounters had 35.6% decreased instantaneous risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–0.78; P < 0.0001), 11.2% decreased length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90–0.93; P < 0.0001), 7.5% decreased instantaneous risk of sepsis (adjusted HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86–0.99; P = 0.0317) and 24.9% increased instantaneous risk of unanticipated intensive care unit transfer (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09–1.43; P = 0.0011) compared with usual-care group encounters. No adverse events were reported. A machine learning-based EWS, modeled on nursing surveillance patterns, decreased inpatient deterioration risk with statistical significance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03911687.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.