Xinyuan Zhang, Hengxin Li, Xiaoyu Niu, Hang Fu, Rong Xu, Ke Xu, Weifeng Yuan, Ting Xu, Jiangyao Zeng, Ziqi Zhou, Yu Song, Suming Zhang, Yingkun Guo, Shan Huang, Huayan Xu
{"title":"通过脑 18F-FDG-PET/CT 评估的压力相关神经活动与心血管后果之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Xinyuan Zhang, Hengxin Li, Xiaoyu Niu, Hang Fu, Rong Xu, Ke Xu, Weifeng Yuan, Ting Xu, Jiangyao Zeng, Ziqi Zhou, Yu Song, Suming Zhang, Yingkun Guo, Shan Huang, Huayan Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07217-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Our study aims to investigate the associations between stress-related neural activity (SNA), a quantified imaging biomarker in processing stress responses assessed by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes based on available evidence.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched databases from inception to December 1, 2024. Studies assessing the associations between SNA, as quantified by measuring FDG uptake values in the amygdala using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, and CV outcomes were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects model was implemented for pooled effect sizes (ESs) and heterogeneity evaluation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Ten studies with 3523 patients with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT were included in our analysis (mean age: 58.5 years; 48.9% female). The ESs included in the analysis comprised hazard ratios (HR) and standardized mean differences (SMD). Among the studies reporting HR, 192 (11.5%) patients experienced composite adverse CV events during a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. SNA significantly correlated with an increased risk of composite adverse CV events (pooled adjusted HR: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 2.32). Among the studies reported SMD, individuals experienced composite adverse CV events had significantly higher SNA values than those who did not (Hedges’s g = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.96).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>SNA, as a noninvasive quantified indicator of processing stress responses assessed by brain <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and to investigate the clinical utility of SNA across various demographic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relation between stress-related neural activity assessed by brain 18F-FDG-PET/CT and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xinyuan Zhang, Hengxin Li, Xiaoyu Niu, Hang Fu, Rong Xu, Ke Xu, Weifeng Yuan, Ting Xu, Jiangyao Zeng, Ziqi Zhou, Yu Song, Suming Zhang, Yingkun Guo, Shan Huang, Huayan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-025-07217-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Our study aims to investigate the associations between stress-related neural activity (SNA), a quantified imaging biomarker in processing stress responses assessed by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes based on available evidence.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We searched databases from inception to December 1, 2024. Studies assessing the associations between SNA, as quantified by measuring FDG uptake values in the amygdala using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, and CV outcomes were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects model was implemented for pooled effect sizes (ESs) and heterogeneity evaluation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Ten studies with 3523 patients with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT were included in our analysis (mean age: 58.5 years; 48.9% female). The ESs included in the analysis comprised hazard ratios (HR) and standardized mean differences (SMD). Among the studies reporting HR, 192 (11.5%) patients experienced composite adverse CV events during a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. SNA significantly correlated with an increased risk of composite adverse CV events (pooled adjusted HR: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 2.32). Among the studies reported SMD, individuals experienced composite adverse CV events had significantly higher SNA values than those who did not (Hedges’s g = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.96).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>SNA, as a noninvasive quantified indicator of processing stress responses assessed by brain <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and to investigate the clinical utility of SNA across various demographic groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07217-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07217-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relation between stress-related neural activity assessed by brain 18F-FDG-PET/CT and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose
Our study aims to investigate the associations between stress-related neural activity (SNA), a quantified imaging biomarker in processing stress responses assessed by 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes based on available evidence.
Methods
We searched databases from inception to December 1, 2024. Studies assessing the associations between SNA, as quantified by measuring FDG uptake values in the amygdala using 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and CV outcomes were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects model was implemented for pooled effect sizes (ESs) and heterogeneity evaluation.
Results
Ten studies with 3523 patients with 18F-FDG-PET/CT were included in our analysis (mean age: 58.5 years; 48.9% female). The ESs included in the analysis comprised hazard ratios (HR) and standardized mean differences (SMD). Among the studies reporting HR, 192 (11.5%) patients experienced composite adverse CV events during a mean follow-up period of 3.8 years. SNA significantly correlated with an increased risk of composite adverse CV events (pooled adjusted HR: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 2.32). Among the studies reported SMD, individuals experienced composite adverse CV events had significantly higher SNA values than those who did not (Hedges’s g = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.96).
Conclusions
SNA, as a noninvasive quantified indicator of processing stress responses assessed by brain 18F-FDG-PET/CT, is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and to investigate the clinical utility of SNA across various demographic groups.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.