飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后测量眼压的最佳时机:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S509212
William J Herspiegel, Brian E Yu, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta, Cindy M L Hutnik
{"title":"飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后测量眼压的最佳时机:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"William J Herspiegel, Brian E Yu, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta, Cindy M L Hutnik","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S509212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has increasingly been adopted worldwide. Lagging behind is evidence-based consensus regarding optimal timing for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement following FLACS. The purpose of this study was to determine if enough evidence currently exists to guide best practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE until February 6th, 2023. Articles reporting IOP measurements following uncomplicated FLACS were screened. For change in IOP at various post-operative timepoints, standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the mean difference in IOP from baseline. Risk of Bias Assessment was conducted following data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis incorporated six randomized clinical studies involving a total of 1356 eyes from 1032 participants. Post-operative day one was the only timepoint with a non-significant increase in IOP (SMD = -0.08 [95% CI: -0.41 to +0.24]) compared to the 7-days, 30-days, 60 to 90-days, and 180-days follow-up periods. All studies except one utilized an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) in their procedure; this was the only publication that reported a decrease in IOP from baseline within the 1-day follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the optimal time to measure IOP is within the first 24 hours after FLACS. However, these findings are limited by a small study sample. Future prospective clinical trials may be beneficial to determine if specific timepoints within the first 24 hours exist to optimize outcomes and patient reported experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1045-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Timing for Intraocular Pressure Measurement Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"William J Herspiegel, Brian E Yu, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta, Cindy M L Hutnik\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S509212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has increasingly been adopted worldwide. Lagging behind is evidence-based consensus regarding optimal timing for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement following FLACS. The purpose of this study was to determine if enough evidence currently exists to guide best practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE until February 6th, 2023. Articles reporting IOP measurements following uncomplicated FLACS were screened. For change in IOP at various post-operative timepoints, standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the mean difference in IOP from baseline. Risk of Bias Assessment was conducted following data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis incorporated six randomized clinical studies involving a total of 1356 eyes from 1032 participants. Post-operative day one was the only timepoint with a non-significant increase in IOP (SMD = -0.08 [95% CI: -0.41 to +0.24]) compared to the 7-days, 30-days, 60 to 90-days, and 180-days follow-up periods. All studies except one utilized an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) in their procedure; this was the only publication that reported a decrease in IOP from baseline within the 1-day follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the optimal time to measure IOP is within the first 24 hours after FLACS. However, these findings are limited by a small study sample. Future prospective clinical trials may be beneficial to determine if specific timepoints within the first 24 hours exist to optimize outcomes and patient reported experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1045-1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S509212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S509212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)在世界范围内的应用越来越广泛。滞后的是基于证据的共识,即FLACS后测量眼压(IOP)的最佳时机。本研究的目的是确定目前是否存在足够的证据来指导最佳实践。方法:于2023年2月6日在MEDLINE和EMBASE上进行全面的文献检索。对报道简单FLACS后IOP测量的文章进行筛选。对于术后各时间点IOP的变化,计算标准化平均差值(SMD)作为IOP与基线的平均差值。数据提取后进行偏倚风险评估。结果:荟萃分析纳入了6项随机临床研究,涉及来自1032名参与者的1356只眼睛。与随访7天、30天、60天至90天和180天相比,术后第一天是IOP无显著升高的唯一时间点(SMD = -0.08 [95% CI: -0.41至+0.24])。除一项研究外,所有研究均在其手术过程中使用眼粘手术装置(OVD);这是唯一一篇报道在1天随访期内IOP较基线下降的文献。结论:FLACS术后24小时内是测量IOP的最佳时间。然而,这些发现受到小样本研究的限制。未来的前瞻性临床试验可能有助于确定是否存在最初24小时内的特定时间点来优化结果和患者报告的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Timing for Intraocular Pressure Measurement Following Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has increasingly been adopted worldwide. Lagging behind is evidence-based consensus regarding optimal timing for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement following FLACS. The purpose of this study was to determine if enough evidence currently exists to guide best practice.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE until February 6th, 2023. Articles reporting IOP measurements following uncomplicated FLACS were screened. For change in IOP at various post-operative timepoints, standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated as the mean difference in IOP from baseline. Risk of Bias Assessment was conducted following data extraction.

Results: The meta-analysis incorporated six randomized clinical studies involving a total of 1356 eyes from 1032 participants. Post-operative day one was the only timepoint with a non-significant increase in IOP (SMD = -0.08 [95% CI: -0.41 to +0.24]) compared to the 7-days, 30-days, 60 to 90-days, and 180-days follow-up periods. All studies except one utilized an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) in their procedure; this was the only publication that reported a decrease in IOP from baseline within the 1-day follow-up period.

Conclusion: The results suggest that the optimal time to measure IOP is within the first 24 hours after FLACS. However, these findings are limited by a small study sample. Future prospective clinical trials may be beneficial to determine if specific timepoints within the first 24 hours exist to optimize outcomes and patient reported experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信