针对诊断前痴呆人群的策略的经济评价:系统评价方案。

HRB open research Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.14064.2
Men Thi Hoang, Alina Zenker, Sanjib Saha, Ulf-Göran Gerdtham, Dominic Trepel
{"title":"针对诊断前痴呆人群的策略的经济评价:系统评价方案。","authors":"Men Thi Hoang, Alina Zenker, Sanjib Saha, Ulf-Göran Gerdtham, Dominic Trepel","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.14064.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia remains incurable, and treatment trials are typically conducted after the symptoms manifest, potentially too late in the disease process to alter its course. Early identification and intervention during the pre-diagnosis phase offer the potential to introduce more cost-effective strategies and enhance quality of life. This review aims to scrutinise emerging evidence and present a comprehensive summary of cost-effectiveness estimates of all strategies targeting the pre-diagnosis dementia population.</p><p><strong>Method and analysis: </strong>A systematic search will be conducted across six electronic databases. All articles will be assessed against pre-defined eligibility criteria through title and abstract screening, and full-text screening phases. Data from the included articles will be extracted using a standardized template. A newly established framework based on the CHEERS 2022 checklist will be applied to assess the reporting quality of the included articles. The entire review process, from screening to data extraction and quality assessment, will be a dual process conducted by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved by a third senior reviewer. The extracted data will be synthesised and presented in tables and figures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review will present evidence of cost-effectiveness, along with the strengths and limitations of the existing literature. These findings aim to identify existing gaps, thereby informing and guiding the design of future studies in this domain.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Since this is a systematic review protocol, ethical approval is not required. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, with both raw and summarised data shared through the journal or other open platforms.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO - CRD42024521521.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"8 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluations  of strategies targeting pre-diagnosis dementia  populations: Protocol for a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Men Thi Hoang, Alina Zenker, Sanjib Saha, Ulf-Göran Gerdtham, Dominic Trepel\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.14064.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia remains incurable, and treatment trials are typically conducted after the symptoms manifest, potentially too late in the disease process to alter its course. Early identification and intervention during the pre-diagnosis phase offer the potential to introduce more cost-effective strategies and enhance quality of life. This review aims to scrutinise emerging evidence and present a comprehensive summary of cost-effectiveness estimates of all strategies targeting the pre-diagnosis dementia population.</p><p><strong>Method and analysis: </strong>A systematic search will be conducted across six electronic databases. All articles will be assessed against pre-defined eligibility criteria through title and abstract screening, and full-text screening phases. Data from the included articles will be extracted using a standardized template. A newly established framework based on the CHEERS 2022 checklist will be applied to assess the reporting quality of the included articles. The entire review process, from screening to data extraction and quality assessment, will be a dual process conducted by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved by a third senior reviewer. The extracted data will be synthesised and presented in tables and figures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review will present evidence of cost-effectiveness, along with the strengths and limitations of the existing literature. These findings aim to identify existing gaps, thereby informing and guiding the design of future studies in this domain.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Since this is a systematic review protocol, ethical approval is not required. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, with both raw and summarised data shared through the journal or other open platforms.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO - CRD42024521521.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14064.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14064.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:痴呆症仍然是不治之症,治疗试验通常在症状出现后进行,可能在疾病过程中太晚,无法改变其进程。在诊断前阶段的早期识别和干预提供了引入更具成本效益的战略和提高生活质量的潜力。本综述旨在仔细审查新出现的证据,并对针对诊断前痴呆人群的所有策略的成本效益估计进行全面总结。方法和分析:将在六个电子数据库中进行系统搜索。所有文章将通过标题和摘要筛选以及全文筛选阶段,根据预先定义的资格标准进行评估。将使用标准化模板从纳入的文章中提取数据。将采用以“干杯2022”清单为基础的新建立的框架来评估纳入文章的报告质量。整个审查过程,从筛选到数据提取和质量评估,将由两名审查人员进行双重过程。分歧将由第三位资深审稿人解决。提取的数据将被综合并以表格和图表的形式呈现。结论:本系统综述将提供成本效益的证据,以及现有文献的优势和局限性。这些发现旨在确定现有的差距,从而为该领域未来研究的设计提供信息和指导。伦理和传播:由于这是一个系统评价方案,不需要伦理批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,原始数据和总结数据将通过期刊或其他开放平台共享。系统评价注册:PROSPERO - CRD42024521521。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic evaluations  of strategies targeting pre-diagnosis dementia  populations: Protocol for a systematic review.

Introduction: Dementia remains incurable, and treatment trials are typically conducted after the symptoms manifest, potentially too late in the disease process to alter its course. Early identification and intervention during the pre-diagnosis phase offer the potential to introduce more cost-effective strategies and enhance quality of life. This review aims to scrutinise emerging evidence and present a comprehensive summary of cost-effectiveness estimates of all strategies targeting the pre-diagnosis dementia population.

Method and analysis: A systematic search will be conducted across six electronic databases. All articles will be assessed against pre-defined eligibility criteria through title and abstract screening, and full-text screening phases. Data from the included articles will be extracted using a standardized template. A newly established framework based on the CHEERS 2022 checklist will be applied to assess the reporting quality of the included articles. The entire review process, from screening to data extraction and quality assessment, will be a dual process conducted by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved by a third senior reviewer. The extracted data will be synthesised and presented in tables and figures.

Conclusion: This systematic review will present evidence of cost-effectiveness, along with the strengths and limitations of the existing literature. These findings aim to identify existing gaps, thereby informing and guiding the design of future studies in this domain.

Ethics and dissemination: Since this is a systematic review protocol, ethical approval is not required. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, with both raw and summarised data shared through the journal or other open platforms.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO - CRD42024521521.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信