IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Austin T Coale, Stephanie C Pittman, Coby B Dorsey, Farhan Chowdry, David J Berkoff
{"title":"The effect of repetitive exercise on tensile changes in the infraspinatus muscle evaluated with ultrasound elastography.","authors":"Austin T Coale, Stephanie C Pittman, Coby B Dorsey, Farhan Chowdry, David J Berkoff","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01007-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to identify muscle strain accurately is a critical aspect in managing exercise-induced muscle damage. Using differences in muscle stiffness as a proxy for muscle damage and recovery can better inform the decision to continue exercise versus pursue recovery.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/purpose: </strong>To identify changes in rotator cuff stiffness after a single bout of exercise as measured by ultrasound elastography.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>10 healthy subjects, average age of 23.7, were enrolled in this prospective interventional trial. Each subject had a baseline scan then completed a standardized exercise program followed by another scan and daily evaluations until the results returned to within 10% of baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Elastography measurements were collected around the infraspinatus tendon, and the deltoid was used as a baseline standard.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Summary statistics, t-test, and regression analysis were completed for the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average strain was 0.5 at baseline, 0.7 immediately post-exercise, 0.6 on follow-up day 1, and 0.4 on follow-up day 2. There were statically significant differences between every timepoint. baseline-post 0.24, (p < 0.0001), post-day1 (decrease of 0.14, p < 0.0001), day1-day2 (decrease of 0.15, p < 0.0001), and BL-day2 (decrease of 0.05, p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate that the infraspinatus muscle stiffness increases immediately after exercise and takes up to 48 h to return to within 10% of baseline. We also found that at day 2 there continued to be an overcorrection with the infraspinatus remaining softer at this time point.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01007-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确识别肌肉拉伤的能力是处理运动引起的肌肉损伤的一个关键方面。假设/目的:通过超声弹性成像测量,确定单次运动后肩袖僵硬度的变化。研究设计:10 名平均年龄为 23.7 岁的健康受试者参加了这项前瞻性干预试验。每名受试者进行一次基线扫描,然后完成一个标准化的运动项目,接着进行另一次扫描和每日评估,直到结果恢复到基线的 10%以内:方法:在冈下肌腱周围进行弹性成像测量,三角肌作为基线标准:采用的统计分析方法:对数据进行汇总统计、t 检验和回归分析:结果:基线时的平均应变为 0.5,运动后即刻的平均应变为 0.7,随访第 1 天的平均应变为 0.6,随访第 2 天的平均应变为 0.4。每个时间点之间的差异均有统计学意义:这些结果表明,冈下肌僵硬度在运动后会立即增加,需要 48 小时才能恢复到基线的 10% 以内。我们还发现,在第 2 天时,冈下肌仍然较软,继续存在过度矫正现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of repetitive exercise on tensile changes in the infraspinatus muscle evaluated with ultrasound elastography.

Background: The ability to identify muscle strain accurately is a critical aspect in managing exercise-induced muscle damage. Using differences in muscle stiffness as a proxy for muscle damage and recovery can better inform the decision to continue exercise versus pursue recovery.

Hypothesis/purpose: To identify changes in rotator cuff stiffness after a single bout of exercise as measured by ultrasound elastography.

Study design: 10 healthy subjects, average age of 23.7, were enrolled in this prospective interventional trial. Each subject had a baseline scan then completed a standardized exercise program followed by another scan and daily evaluations until the results returned to within 10% of baseline.

Methods: Elastography measurements were collected around the infraspinatus tendon, and the deltoid was used as a baseline standard.

Statistical analysis used: Summary statistics, t-test, and regression analysis were completed for the data.

Results: Average strain was 0.5 at baseline, 0.7 immediately post-exercise, 0.6 on follow-up day 1, and 0.4 on follow-up day 2. There were statically significant differences between every timepoint. baseline-post 0.24, (p < 0.0001), post-day1 (decrease of 0.14, p < 0.0001), day1-day2 (decrease of 0.15, p < 0.0001), and BL-day2 (decrease of 0.05, p < 0.005).

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the infraspinatus muscle stiffness increases immediately after exercise and takes up to 48 h to return to within 10% of baseline. We also found that at day 2 there continued to be an overcorrection with the infraspinatus remaining softer at this time point.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信