全髋关节置换术后复制髋关节生物力学是否能改善患者报告的结果?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew Schneider, MacKenzie Molina, Lauren I Pitz-Gonçalves, Braeden W Estes, Evan R Deckard, Kevin A Sonn, R Michael Meneghini
{"title":"全髋关节置换术后复制髋关节生物力学是否能改善患者报告的结果?","authors":"Andrew Schneider, MacKenzie Molina, Lauren I Pitz-Gonçalves, Braeden W Estes, Evan R Deckard, Kevin A Sonn, R Michael Meneghini","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enabling technology, such as computer navigation and robotics, provides more precise implant position, which allows surgeons the ability for personalized alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To date, THA implant position studies have focused on dislocation rates, rather than on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the impact of the THA component position on clinically significant differences in PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,682 consecutive primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component position as well as femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured on all preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Modern PROM scores were evaluated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) values were assessed for applicable PROMs. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant. The mean clinical follow-up was 21.9 months (range, one to 128).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate analysis, the acetabular component position closer to the native hip center of rotation was associated with a greater probability of achieving the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds (P ≤ 0.008). An increase in postoperative femoral offset was associated with achieving the MCID for the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level and patients being 'very satisfied or satisfied' (P ≤ 0.004). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.8 mm (range, 24.5 mm short to 36.6 mm long); however, postoperative LLD was NOT a predictor of PROMs (P ≥ 0.167) with statistical power ≥ 87%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study results demonstrated that replicating the native center of rotation and optimizing femoral offset was associated with clinically relevant improvements in PROMs. Interestingly, in this large cohort, leg-length inequality was not associated with PROMs. Further research is warranted on THA component position, including spino-pelvic parameters and PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Replicating Native Hip Biomechanics Improve Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Schneider, MacKenzie Molina, Lauren I Pitz-Gonçalves, Braeden W Estes, Evan R Deckard, Kevin A Sonn, R Michael Meneghini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enabling technology, such as computer navigation and robotics, provides more precise implant position, which allows surgeons the ability for personalized alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To date, THA implant position studies have focused on dislocation rates, rather than on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the impact of the THA component position on clinically significant differences in PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,682 consecutive primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component position as well as femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured on all preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Modern PROM scores were evaluated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) values were assessed for applicable PROMs. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant. The mean clinical follow-up was 21.9 months (range, one to 128).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate analysis, the acetabular component position closer to the native hip center of rotation was associated with a greater probability of achieving the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds (P ≤ 0.008). An increase in postoperative femoral offset was associated with achieving the MCID for the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level and patients being 'very satisfied or satisfied' (P ≤ 0.004). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.8 mm (range, 24.5 mm short to 36.6 mm long); however, postoperative LLD was NOT a predictor of PROMs (P ≥ 0.167) with statistical power ≥ 87%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study results demonstrated that replicating the native center of rotation and optimizing femoral offset was associated with clinically relevant improvements in PROMs. Interestingly, in this large cohort, leg-length inequality was not associated with PROMs. Further research is warranted on THA component position, including spino-pelvic parameters and PROMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使能技术,如计算机导航和机器人技术,提供了更精确的植入物位置,这使得外科医生能够在全髋关节置换术(THA)中进行个性化对齐。迄今为止,THA植入物位置研究主要集中在脱位率上,而不是患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。本研究评估THA组件位置对PROMs临床显著差异的影响。方法:对1,682例连续原发性tha进行回顾性分析。在所有术前和术后x线片上测量髋臼和股骨假体位置以及股骨偏移和腿长差异(LLD)。评估现代毕业舞会分数。最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)值被评估为适用的PROMs。单因素及多因素统计分析均以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。平均临床随访21.9个月(1 ~ 128个月)。结果:在多变量分析中,髋臼假体位置越靠近髋关节旋转中心,达到髋关节残疾和骨关节炎关节置换术结局评分(HOOS JR)、MCID、SCB和PASS阈值的可能性越大(P≤0.008)。术后股骨偏移量的增加与达到加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动水平的MCID和患者“非常满意或满意”相关(P≤0.004)。术后平均LLD为3.8 mm(范围:24.5 mm短至36.6 mm长);然而,术后LLD不是PROMs的预测因子(P≥0.167),统计能力≥87%。结论:研究结果表明,复制天然旋转中心和优化股骨偏移与PROMs的临床相关改善有关。有趣的是,在这个庞大的队列中,腿长不平等与prom无关。需要进一步研究THA组件位置,包括脊柱-骨盆参数和PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Replicating Native Hip Biomechanics Improve Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background: Enabling technology, such as computer navigation and robotics, provides more precise implant position, which allows surgeons the ability for personalized alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To date, THA implant position studies have focused on dislocation rates, rather than on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study evaluated the impact of the THA component position on clinically significant differences in PROMs.

Methods: A total of 1,682 consecutive primary THAs were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular and femoral component position as well as femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured on all preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Modern PROM scores were evaluated. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) values were assessed for applicable PROMs. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as significant. The mean clinical follow-up was 21.9 months (range, one to 128).

Results: In multivariate analysis, the acetabular component position closer to the native hip center of rotation was associated with a greater probability of achieving the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds (P ≤ 0.008). An increase in postoperative femoral offset was associated with achieving the MCID for the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level and patients being 'very satisfied or satisfied' (P ≤ 0.004). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.8 mm (range, 24.5 mm short to 36.6 mm long); however, postoperative LLD was NOT a predictor of PROMs (P ≥ 0.167) with statistical power ≥ 87%.

Conclusion: Study results demonstrated that replicating the native center of rotation and optimizing femoral offset was associated with clinically relevant improvements in PROMs. Interestingly, in this large cohort, leg-length inequality was not associated with PROMs. Further research is warranted on THA component position, including spino-pelvic parameters and PROMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信