用项目反应理论提高语音障碍指数-10的测量效率。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/lary.32161
Elliana Kirsh DeVore, Thomas L Carroll, Maria Edelen, Clark Rosen, Jennifer J Shin
{"title":"用项目反应理论提高语音障碍指数-10的测量效率。","authors":"Elliana Kirsh DeVore, Thomas L Carroll, Maria Edelen, Clark Rosen, Jennifer J Shin","doi":"10.1002/lary.32161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess: (1) the Voice Handicap-10 (VHI) instrument with item response theory (IRT) and determine which items convey the most information, (2) the extent to which voice handicap can be measured with a subset of items for efficient information intake, and (3) whether a proposed shorter scale has differing discriminatory ability for key diagnoses made by fellowship-trained laryngologists, as compared to the 10-item instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from 3640 patients who completed the VHI-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analysis provided discrimination and location parameters associated with each item. Residual item correlations were also assessed to assess redundant information. Based on these results, two 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for findings from videolaryngoscopy/stroboscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.55 to 4.68, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, potential 5-item subsets were proposed, which preserved the capacity to reflect underlying voice handicap assessment. ROC-AUC analyses suggested no significant difference between the 5-item subset and 10-item instrument with regard to their ability to discriminate whether findings such as vocal fold paralysis were present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRT data distinguished items for a proposed 5-item subset of the 10-item instrument, with the goal of reflecting the latent trait without significant loss of discrimination and precision.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2-Prospective validation study with reference standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Voice Handicap Index-10 With Item Response Theory.\",\"authors\":\"Elliana Kirsh DeVore, Thomas L Carroll, Maria Edelen, Clark Rosen, Jennifer J Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess: (1) the Voice Handicap-10 (VHI) instrument with item response theory (IRT) and determine which items convey the most information, (2) the extent to which voice handicap can be measured with a subset of items for efficient information intake, and (3) whether a proposed shorter scale has differing discriminatory ability for key diagnoses made by fellowship-trained laryngologists, as compared to the 10-item instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from 3640 patients who completed the VHI-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analysis provided discrimination and location parameters associated with each item. Residual item correlations were also assessed to assess redundant information. Based on these results, two 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for findings from videolaryngoscopy/stroboscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.55 to 4.68, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, potential 5-item subsets were proposed, which preserved the capacity to reflect underlying voice handicap assessment. ROC-AUC analyses suggested no significant difference between the 5-item subset and 10-item instrument with regard to their ability to discriminate whether findings such as vocal fold paralysis were present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IRT data distinguished items for a proposed 5-item subset of the 10-item instrument, with the goal of reflecting the latent trait without significant loss of discrimination and precision.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2-Prospective validation study with reference standard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估:(1)用项目反应理论(IRT)评估声音障碍-10 (VHI)量表,并确定哪些项目传达了最多的信息;(2)用一组项目子集来衡量声音障碍的程度,以获得有效的信息摄入;(3)与10项量表相比,拟议的较短量表在由接受过奖学金培训的喉科医生做出的关键诊断方面是否具有不同的区分能力。方法:前瞻性收集某三级耳鼻喉科门诊3640例患者在评估期间完成VHI-10问卷调查的数据。IRT分析提供了与每个项目相关的识别和位置参数。残差项目相关性也被评估以评估冗余信息。在此基础上,进一步利用项目信息函数曲线对两个5项子集进行评价。还计算了接受者-操作者特征曲线(ROC-AUC)下的面积,以评估对视频喉镜/频闪镜检查结果的区分能力。结果:项目判别参数估计值在1.55 ~ 4.68之间,值越大说明信息越多。在项目对中确定剩余项目相关性,并计算位置参数。基于这些数据,提出了潜在的5项子集,保留了反映潜在语音障碍评估的能力。ROC-AUC分析表明,在区分是否存在声带麻痹等症状的能力方面,5项亚组和10项仪器之间没有显著差异。结论:IRT数据区分了10项工具的5项子集的项目,其目标是在不显着丧失辨别和精度的情况下反映潜在特质。证据等级:2级,参考标准前瞻性验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Voice Handicap Index-10 With Item Response Theory.

Objectives: To assess: (1) the Voice Handicap-10 (VHI) instrument with item response theory (IRT) and determine which items convey the most information, (2) the extent to which voice handicap can be measured with a subset of items for efficient information intake, and (3) whether a proposed shorter scale has differing discriminatory ability for key diagnoses made by fellowship-trained laryngologists, as compared to the 10-item instrument.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from 3640 patients who completed the VHI-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analysis provided discrimination and location parameters associated with each item. Residual item correlations were also assessed to assess redundant information. Based on these results, two 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for findings from videolaryngoscopy/stroboscopy.

Results: Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.55 to 4.68, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, potential 5-item subsets were proposed, which preserved the capacity to reflect underlying voice handicap assessment. ROC-AUC analyses suggested no significant difference between the 5-item subset and 10-item instrument with regard to their ability to discriminate whether findings such as vocal fold paralysis were present.

Conclusions: IRT data distinguished items for a proposed 5-item subset of the 10-item instrument, with the goal of reflecting the latent trait without significant loss of discrimination and precision.

Level of evidence: Level 2-Prospective validation study with reference standard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信