IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.20
Sagar Jilka, Catherine Winsper, Samantha A Johnson, Onaedo Ilozumba, Ryan G Wagner, Sanjana Subhedar, Dafne Morroni, Richard Lilford, Swaran P Singh
{"title":"A scoping review to evaluate the efficacy of combining traditional healing and modern psychiatry in global mental healthcare.","authors":"Sagar Jilka, Catherine Winsper, Samantha A Johnson, Onaedo Ilozumba, Ryan G Wagner, Sanjana Subhedar, Dafne Morroni, Richard Lilford, Swaran P Singh","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2025.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional faith healers (TFHs) are often consulted for serious mental illness (SMIs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Involvement of TFHs in mental healthcare could provide an opportunity for early identification and intervention to reduce the mental health treatment gap in LMICs. The aim of this study was to identify models of collaboration between TFHs and biomedical professionals, determine the outcomes of these collaborative models and identify any mechanisms (i.e., explanatory processes) or contextual moderators (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these outcomes. A systematic scoping review of five electronic databases was performed from inception to March 2023 guided by consultation with local experts in Nigeria and Bangladesh. Data were extracted using a predefined data charting form and synthesised narratively. Six independent studies (eight articles) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Study locations included Ghana (n = 1), Nigeria (n = 1), Nigeria and Ghana (n = 1), India (n = 1), Hong Kong (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). We identified two main intervention typologies: (1) Western-based educational interventions for TFHs and (2) shared collaborative models between TFHs and biomedical professionals. Converging evidence from both typologies indicated that education for TFHs can help reduce harmful practices. Shared collaborative models led to significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms (in comparison to care as usual) and increases in referrals to biomedical care from TFHs. Proposed mechanisms underpinning outcomes included trust building and empowering TFHs by increasing awareness and knowledge of mental illness and human rights. Barriers to implementation were observed at the individual (e.g., suspicions of TFHs), relationship (e.g., reluctance of biomedical practitioners to equalise their status with TFHs) and service (e.g., lack of formal referral systems) levels. Research on collaborative models for mental healthcare is in its infancy. Preliminary findings are encouraging. To ensure effective collaboration, future programmes should incorporate active participation from community stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers, faith healers) and target barriers to implementation on multiple levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.20","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中低收入国家(LMICs),严重精神疾病(SMIs)通常会咨询传统信仰治疗师(TFHs)。让传统信仰疗法者参与精神医疗保健可为早期识别和干预提供机会,从而缩小低收入和中等收入国家的精神健康治疗差距。本研究旨在确定家庭医生与生物医学专业人员之间的合作模式,确定这些合作模式的成果,并确定这些成果的机制(即解释过程)或背景调节因素(即障碍和促进因素)。在咨询尼日利亚和孟加拉国当地专家的指导下,从开始到 2023 年 3 月对五个电子数据库进行了系统的范围界定审查。使用预定义的数据图表表提取数据,并以叙述的方式进行综合。六项独立研究(八篇文章)符合纳入标准。研究地点包括加纳(n = 1)、尼日利亚(n = 1)、尼日利亚和加纳(n = 1)、印度(n = 1)、香港(n = 1)和南非(n = 1)。我们确定了两种主要的干预类型:(1) 以西方为基础的家庭医生教育干预;(2) 家庭医生与生物医学专业人员之间的共享合作模式。两种类型的综合证据表明,对家庭医生进行教育有助于减少有害做法。共享合作模式显著改善了精神症状(与常规护理相比),并增加了家庭住户向生物医学护理的转诊。建议的成果支撑机制包括建立信任,以及通过提高对精神疾病和人权的认识和了解来增强家庭医生的能力。在个人(如对家庭医生的怀疑)、关系(如生物医学从业人员不愿意与家庭医生地位平等)和服务(如缺乏正式的转诊系统)层面,都发现了实施的障碍。关于精神卫生保健合作模式的研究尚处于起步阶段。初步研究结果令人鼓舞。为确保有效的合作,未来的计划应纳入社区利益相关者(如患者、护理人员、信仰治疗者)的积极参与,并在多个层面上消除实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review to evaluate the efficacy of combining traditional healing and modern psychiatry in global mental healthcare.

Traditional faith healers (TFHs) are often consulted for serious mental illness (SMIs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Involvement of TFHs in mental healthcare could provide an opportunity for early identification and intervention to reduce the mental health treatment gap in LMICs. The aim of this study was to identify models of collaboration between TFHs and biomedical professionals, determine the outcomes of these collaborative models and identify any mechanisms (i.e., explanatory processes) or contextual moderators (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these outcomes. A systematic scoping review of five electronic databases was performed from inception to March 2023 guided by consultation with local experts in Nigeria and Bangladesh. Data were extracted using a predefined data charting form and synthesised narratively. Six independent studies (eight articles) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Study locations included Ghana (n = 1), Nigeria (n = 1), Nigeria and Ghana (n = 1), India (n = 1), Hong Kong (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 1). We identified two main intervention typologies: (1) Western-based educational interventions for TFHs and (2) shared collaborative models between TFHs and biomedical professionals. Converging evidence from both typologies indicated that education for TFHs can help reduce harmful practices. Shared collaborative models led to significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms (in comparison to care as usual) and increases in referrals to biomedical care from TFHs. Proposed mechanisms underpinning outcomes included trust building and empowering TFHs by increasing awareness and knowledge of mental illness and human rights. Barriers to implementation were observed at the individual (e.g., suspicions of TFHs), relationship (e.g., reluctance of biomedical practitioners to equalise their status with TFHs) and service (e.g., lack of formal referral systems) levels. Research on collaborative models for mental healthcare is in its infancy. Preliminary findings are encouraging. To ensure effective collaboration, future programmes should incorporate active participation from community stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers, faith healers) and target barriers to implementation on multiple levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信